on the male loneliness epidemic
on the male loneliness epidemic
on the male loneliness epidemic
Going anywhere in public to socializing is expensive as hell, third places are dead, and the primary way people meet potential SOs is through apps whose purpose isn't to make anyone happy but to extract maximum value from them.
There are people who are off the deep end, yes, but the answer isn't to attack them like this. That's never going to snap anyone out of it, and there really are huge societal problems that are resulting in people withdrawing, which is obviously bad for their mental health.
This is one of those "people hate every piece of capitalism, but refuse to connect the dots to see the picture" things.
Yes exactly.
third places are dead
I've heard this line quite a few times. But... as far as I can tell, camping is still absolutely a popular past time. Parks and beaches are still a thing. Gyms and bars and clubs are as crowded as ever.
This reads much more like a meme than reality.
There are people who are off the deep end, yes, but the answer isn’t to attack them like this.
There's a lot of mass media that's screaming at people about how women and men are natural enemies and the only path to intimacy is through sexual assault.
Absolutely attack this ideology. Drag your friends back from it if you can. Mock and deride the notion if you can't. Don't tolerate the intolerable.
there really are huge societal problems that are resulting in people withdrawing, which is obviously bad for their mental health
Absolutely. So throw a party. Invite people out to do things. Mix and mingle.
Mocking and deriding people is very effective at radicalizing them, please do not do that, it consistently makes the problem worse.
I get that they would deserve that behaviour if they are advocating sexual assault, but if you care about that person, or the cultural issues they're succumbing to, or the rising sentiment that men have to be rapey to ever have success with women, please don't do that, it's detrimental to the cause.
Dead isn’t precise enough. Expensive is generally what they mean. Along with many free spaces being dead.
Having to spend money to socialize is a concern for many. Often times this is a lack of a car too. Or lack of public transportation. Sprawl, Stroads.
It’s a multi variate thing when people quip that third places are dead.
I mean, the answer is that it is both. Like, not having close friends sucks. And not getting laid sucks. And both are valid and legitimate things to complain about.
Like, honestly, the "skill issue" take is super toxic. It's basically the same as telling a poor person that not being rich is a skill issue. The lack of understanding and compassion for peoples' legitimate problems will only radicalize them further.
It's not both because "not getting laid" has nothing to do with the male loneliness epidemic and is not what people mean when they talk about it
the men who won't man up need to be told to man up, especially if they tried to man up by imitating a child predator fascist.
I get you. Some of these boys need to be told to get out there and get scared. Everyone wants to huddle in their comfort zone, and to hell with anything or anyone that drags them out. That's a toxic black hole. If you're not experiencing some discomfort and fear, you're not living life.
Had to break myself away from that black hole today. Went out to my camp. Ah fuck me it sucks out there in the summer. You gotta bathe in bug spray, and reapply constantly. Thought I would stroke out several times. Got some walking and shooting in, got some work done, came home and showered, feel great. Imagine if I had sat at this keyboard all day talking to you fuckers. Downward spiral.
Bravery is being scared and doing it anyway. Be brave.
I mean it also does mean the first thing tho no?
depends on your circles. in feminist and leftist circles, it usually means the first
but most men outside of those circles use it just to mean "im not getting the dates i am ENTITLED to 😡"
No hate OP but I hope you find better friends someday.
Oh, so it's just the deliberate misunderstanding of a nuanced term, like what they did with toxic masculinity.
You got that backwards. Feminist and lefty leaning circles routinely dismiss the first as the second which is partly responsible for pushing young men further right.
The problem is we live in a society pause for laugh track
Where men are told they have to get laid or their personhood is questionable and women are told they must never get laid or their personhood is questionable.
The result is that heterosexual men are frustrated, cisgender women everywhere are afraid of anything with a penis, and dating men as a transwomen is pretty fucking easy because men are tired and desperate.
Source: Am Transwoman
Trans people always have the greatest insight into these issues. Thank you!
I guess it comes from being between the typical roles.
The same predjudice also appears to apply to gay people.
Personally I've just opted out of the whole ordeal and don't care what anyone has to say about my choice.
Do you have any idea how many femboys just went for me? I have to reject them all as it won't work out, but I appreciate it I guess.
Meanwhile, a handful of women went for me. Like, I'm fine now with whatever happens. I simply accepted that people are different, and we don't all have to have the same lives.
I'm tired of this bullshit attitude. It contributes to the very issues it diminishes. Men are allowed to have problems without being incels.
It's not all men's fault, but there are things you can do increase your chances. If your problem is that you never shower, then who is going to date you?
The Tumbler OP is 100% not a man, if they were they‘d know not getting laid as a man is very often not a personal skill issue. I know many young men who are conventionally attractive and emotionally mature who just kind of have lost interest in dating even though they generally want a relationship.
I totally understand that between job/school, social media biases, self-worth doubts and economic insecurities, the incentive to navigate through predatory dating apps and toxic left/right bubbles just to meet another insta reels addict is minimal.
Staying single however makes you neither bloom nor gloom, it‘s just okay. Which is something I‘ve learned not to complain about given the current state of the world. Maybe someday I‘ll reconsider…
I've definitely been there quite a few times. I can get by romantically, but sometimes I just don't have the energy. Finding someone you mesh with can be exhausting.
I have a handful friends of varying genders who seem to be in similar boats. I can't be sure as I haven't asked. It seems like the current options are inadequate for a good chunk of people.
Which is something I‘ve learned not to complain about given the current state of the world. Maybe someday I‘ll reconsider…
This is where I'm at. I have enough stress in my life without adding all the extra crap that comes with trying to date to it. Sure when things are going good it's amazing but that never seems to last and then you end up in limbo trying to evaluate whether it's worth stringing it along or ending it.
Assuming a roughly equal number of straight men and women, either a large amount of women are consistently sleeping with a small number of men or the same number of women are not having sex as men. The former is a pretty common incel assumption that would require women to be a hive mind, so imo the latter should be more true. In my experience as someone present in both male and female social circles, women tend to feel a lot more emotionally supported in platonic relationships while men tend to expect more emotional support from a romantic partner than a platonic friend. I think as a result, men tend to associate physical intimacy with emotional intimacy because they aren't really getting either from their non-romantic relationships. You can see this in the way platonic men are so much less likely to hug each other or hold hands or cuddle than platonic women. So to me, OP is actually onto something with their original assumption. Not getting laid isn't as much of a problem for women because they don't expect as much emotionally from sex and romantic relationships since their emotional needs are fulfilled elsewhere. Imo, male loneliness isn't so much a problem with modern dating or with women as a problem with the fact that social expectations placed on men are preventing men from feeling fulfilled outside of romantic relationships and sex. In conclusion, hug your bros and tell them everything will be okay and you're proud of them.
You've literally just explained what the male loneliness epidemic is and its causes. It's why it's specific to men and a women not understand the nuance here is no diffeeent the people not understanding toxic masculinity.
There is actually some overlap in these two issues and it's one of those rare moments where it's women who need to shut up and listen because it's not about them.
The loneliness epidemic is not a personal attack on women anymore than toxic masculinity is an attack on men. Ultimately, the loneliness epidemic is about reduce the male suicide rate. Anyone who takes it as any attack is misinformed and borders on a self absorbed asshole. Might as well just tell these men to kill themselves.
The solution isn't for women to be more promiscuous because that doesn't fix the problem and isn't what anyone is suggesting is regards to this issue.
Casual sex does not cure loneliness for the majority of men. It may offer temporarily relief but even this isn't true for all men.
I'd even go further to say that the male loneliness epidemic is tied with homophobia.
Not as in the usual way one thinks of homophobia, but as in a fear to do all these things women can do among themselves without being labeled gay or shunned by social peers as being needy or similar things.
Or better saying, it is the fear of having platonic male-male relationship being seen as homosexual relationship (hence, homophobia).
I know many young men who are conventionally attractive and emotionally mature who just kind of have lost interest in dating even though they generally want a relationship.
Big mood. Not to try and jerk myself off about the cinventionally attractive part. But yeah modern dating has become so processed and transactional. As man it feels like you have to put so much work in and practically beg for a bit of time from someone thats git so many options that theyve started to objectify you and are basically just looking for any reason to pass on you and move on to the next person.
And then dating in person isnt much better. I never ever want to be the creepy guy that hits on a girl when shes just trying to enjoy herself, so unlesss a woman approaches me, ehich very rarely happens, im not finding someone that way.
And then dating from freinds has a lot of the same issues, i currently have a freind that i would date, shes given me some signals that she might feel the same way, but possibly also signals the complete opposite and since shes one of my closest freinds i dont want to risk ruining that freindship taking that shot.
Do it anyway. If she's really a good friend, it won't ruin the friendship.
Also the odds are good that you're going to wish you did later.
Dumbass take.
A "skill issue" take, is just a republican "personal responsibility" take.
It's dumb as fuck. How about you examine the systems that produce outcomes? Have you learned literally nothing from the last 50 years of the social justice movement?
Most women tend to not want to form relationships with misogynistic incels. That's what's seen as a skill issue.
Or men with autism or adhd. Cause that's who you target with "just be more social and enjoyable."
Men spending time to fix their financial issues instead of socializing up there too.
Don't deprive the weak men of their agency. So many Trump toxicity 'outcomes' chose this.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feedback
The notion of cause-and-effect has to be handled carefully when applied to feedback systems:
Simple causal reasoning about a feedback system is difficult because the first system influences the second and second system influences the first, leading to a circular argument. This makes reasoning based upon cause and effect tricky, and it is necessary to analyze the system as a whole.
Sucks that men's issues are being treated as a joke or mischaracterized as something else and not important.
I think a big issue is that third places have disappeared or not kept up with culture. All that's near me are bars and Masonic Lodges, younger men are trying to drink less and don't want to wear weird robes to hang out with other guys.
and don't want to where weird robes to hang out with other guys.
Meanwhile I met most of my friends through the SCA.
No judgement, just thought it was funny
In so many words, this is just another "you're lonely because you're a bad person" misandrist jerk.
It's not that bad.
The idea that men are struggling to find friends is a real concern that should be addressed, people being unable to find sexual companionship because people of their desired sex don’t want to be around them due to their personal choices is something that can be made fun of.
Many women want a guy who is pro choice, can cook, is able to hold a conversation that’s not about sex, is capable of having platonic female friends, has hobbies, and has decent hygiene.
If that is not something you can attain, that’s fine and there are still women out there for you but that eliminates a large percentage so if you want to be picky on top of that you are going to have a problem
The idea that men are struggling to find friends is a real concern that should be addressed, people being unable to find sexual companionship because people of their desired sex don’t want to be around them due to their personal choices is something that can be made fun of.
But conflating those two categories of men as if all lonely men are the latter, does no good to anyone, and only helps fuel misandric stereotypes.
Pro choice, sympathetic to womens issues, good cook, able to converse about many topics, platonic female friends, hobbies, good hygiene, >6ft tall, healthy weight, reasonably attractive, good degree and then job.
That is/was me and I'm happily married, but it took 7 years of putting a lot of effort into dating before I met her, and I was not picky about who I dated.
The idea that men can easily find a partner by meeting a few basic requirements is divisive tribalist nonsense.
Alright, anedotical evidence time! I am aware I am in a bit of a bubble, as I try to avoid the local variant of maga as much as possible in my life.
But I know several single male friends who I would say are at least of average attractiveness, smart, funny, know how to use a shower and a toothbrush, have decent education/money, cool hobbies and are politically progressive. Also I know of at least three of them who are deeply unhappy about not getting into a meaningful relationship.
Sometimes people are just stuck in a life situation or a place with not many compatible options and ways to meet people.
Many women want a guy who is pro choice, can cook, is able to hold a conversation that’s not about sex, is capable of having platonic female friends, has hobbies, and has decent hygiene.
As someone who is literally all of these, it's still a nightmare to find a romantic partner. Personallt, I've given up on going out of my way to find someone, because every time I put myself out there I either get ignored or ghosted
Damn, the platonic female friends part really got me. Reality is sad.
If it's misandrist to tell the Trump voters who modeled their personalities on empty victory declaration and hurting brown people, then I'm a proud misandrist. Men who suck don't deserve to get laid. No one deserves sex.
You... do realize there are lonely men in other countries, right? Like, the US is not the only place on Earth? Ah yes, the infamous Trump voters from checks notes ... Norway, Egypt, Japan, etc.
And if you're gonna say "Well they're not voting for Trump but some other Trump-like politician", don't bother. You can't generalize every man, half the world population, just because you know men who voted Trump/Trump equivalents. Because if that'd be how it works, I could just as easily find you a woman that voted Trump and then point out how, supposedly, women suck cause they vote Trump based on this "evidence".
Thank you for perfectly demonstrating one aspect of the peoblem you claim to understand. Assuming all lonely men are conservative is not only wrong but fucking stupid and extremely judgemental. Thank you for proving that you do not understand this problem what so ever, so now you can be safely ignored for the rest of this conversation.
Yeah. Politicians won't get nowhere telling the population about their next NO-BLUEBALLS Act.
It has nothing to do with getting laid.
Came here to say this.
I'm 42, happily married, and can't find/keep/make a friend to save my life. My wife is very anti-social/introverted and has a good number of friends.
I cycle between thinking my interests suck, or I must just be un-fucking-bareable to be around and completely oblivious.
Maybe both... Probably both.
Man, I feel you. I am genuinely jealous of people who can walk in a room and be friends with everyone in a few minutes.
I'm in my 40s and made a number of new friends this year by getting involved with my local fighting game scene. If you're into videogames at all I'd suggest trying it, and if you're not into fighting games specifically there are absolutely people at your locals who will be happy, if not excited, to teach you.
Fighting games are unique among competitive games in that while there is no cooperative aspect in the game itself they have developed one of the most collaborative and friendliest gaming communities I have ever had the pleasure of interacting with.
I am 43, currently dating someone, but this is more someone to spend some intimate time with, and do things with, with neither planning on anything deeper. I guess a type of friends with benefits. My last relationship was very long and serious, but we both had some serious issues, I went on to work on mine, she spent a few more years not trying to get help, and then she spent a few years with serious improvement, but died late last year. So I am not really trying for anything deep.
I moved to were I am about 6 years ago, I have several new friends, a number of acquaintances I get along with at social events, and said girlfriend. This is how it has always worked out for me. I am not sure why. I do believe that growing up in a situation where I moved every couple of years, and thus had to make new friends every time, kinda play a big role in how I developed. On top of this I have the blessing/curse of not experiencing anxiety, this often helps in the beginning, but that lack of inhibition can also turn a lot of people off. However, that is me.
This being said one of the biggest differences I see between me, and people around me who have no friends, is that I spend time researching what is going on where I live, and then I participate in it. Often I don't even like what it is, but I would otherwise be sitting at home, so fuck it, might as well. Beyond this I go out of my way to talk to everyone, in a general group sense. I don't hone in on one person, and I keep it very casual. The critical thing though, is that there is reciprocal conversation. I ask them something "Oh, hey I am new here, how long have you been guys been involved in this?" I try to keep it to where I am asking, comfortably non-invasive, questions about themselves, and try and get them to talk about themselves, and hopefully their interests. Then you make yourself a regular, and over time, the conversation become much more second nature, and you slowly get to know each other better.
Another thing is that I know a lot of people just won't like me. That is fine. Even rude rejection is just a minor thing to me. I have been reject so many times that if I took it personally, well, I doubt I could deal with it. There are people out there with some sort of overlap between you and them, see if you can make this something. You need to view rejection as just a minor inconvenience. Move on. I see so many men who refuse to do the footwork to get this off the ground, and of those who do, I see many who display disturbing behavior over rejection. It is no wonder why women are scared to give definite answers, hand out fake phone numbers, and lie to create an exit for so many interactions.
Small talk is the gateway to real conversation. Finding places people go to socialize while doing a particular thing provides an immediate ice breaker, ie "Hey, I am new here, how long have you guys been doing this?", as well as a topic to discuss. Rejection isn't to be taken personally the vast majority of the time. Working on improving yourself is very important. Always be looking for things to improve on, discuss it. These places of interest are not obvious because society has decided you need to pay simply to be human these days, but unless you live in the middle of nowhere, there are things going on out there. Often these interest groups will meet at a designated house. If you can't find one that you enjoy, go to one based on something you have not done before. Tell people you aren't just new to the group, but to the whole thing. Get conversation off the ground by asking about the topic. You can make good friends from places created to do things you aren't really interested in. What I would do is if I can't find something that fits my interests, I look for things that are interests with a lot of cross over between that, and people who are interested in something I enjoy.
If you live in the middle of nowhere, and you are unhappy, and isolated, do anything to move away from that. It won't be easy, and it won't be comfortable, and it will be anxiety inducing, but that is all part and parcel of life. It sucks. Moving to places, and traveling is it's own set of skills. People who don't really do that, at least not often, can get overwhelmed with it. When I say anything I mean it. Sure, don't like do something particularly dangerous, but it will have to become a singular goal you spend your time working towards. Living in a tiny rural area, where you have no friends, no interests, and you are isolated, is a death sentence. Not always literally, but internally. This tiny place is what it is, and if there is nothing for you, it is to small to change in a way that will work for you. You need to get out.
If your work/life balance is way out of whack, you will need to put a lot of effort into changing that. I spent a lot of time working 70+ hour weeks. It was literally killing me. I began spending the very little personal time I had looking for work that gave me some hope of having a life. I would have to make a lot of material sacrifices, as I would make significantly less, but the restructuring of my life, in that direction, was the only way I could avoid dying from stress in my office. This shit sucked, and ultimately my life collapsed, but that is a whole other story. Point being, if you have no life because you work all the time, that shit needs to change, and it isn't going to be easy.
All of these things are skills, you need to practice them by doing them, and you need to learn how to accept failure, and course correction. You may also have depression, or other psych issues, and need therapy. Depending on where you are this can go from "well it's there" to "this is an expensive luxury". There is no real good answer here. Giving any real advice would require knowledge of all the things going on with you to make any type of recommendation.
I mean, it's welcome. But it has more to do with everyone is an asshole, and not worth being around really.
Yes, I was so confused when reading this.
There something quite ableist about all of this.
As if everyone can pull themselves up by their bootstraps without the support of a community around them.
and then i learned what people meant by it (men arent getting laid)
Weird post, that literally just isn't a thing at all. This reads like a thinly veiled attempt to try to put down people they perceive as "not getting laid". This kind of "skill issue" attack rhetoric actually contributes to the male loneliness epidemic
It's as ironic as it is frustrating that so many of the same people who'd be outraged at the notion of a woman's value being determined in any part, by whether she is a virgin, will, gleefully and without irony, consider virginity not only a valid, but a go-to insult to use against men.
Double standards are so irritating.
Yeah, right? Sex isn‘t even a huge aspect of why I‘d want a relationship anymore. It would complement it, sure, but if the relationship otherwise is just an expensive, instagram story bullshit, body insecurity fuelled mess where eating disorder meets self-worth anxiety…fuck no!
I just want someone to hug and cuddle with atp if I‘m being real. Does sharing this on lemmy make me “weak” and “un-manly” in the eyes of society? Maybe, but that‘s part of a problem I honestly don‘t care about any longer.
To me, it reads like they're just extrapolating the statements from the loudest group of people who tend to yell online about the male loneliness epidemic (incels that blame women for their celibacy) out and assuming that's the majority opinion, which actually tends to be more referencing actual loneliness in general. Either that, or they just worded it a little badly.
I do agree that the rhetoric can be a bit detrimental though.
Yeah, the OP can suck eggs on this one.
That isn't what people mean by it. Loneliness means loneliness.
Imagine what would happen if somebody said this about women. Are you lonely, ladies? Have you tried being enjoyable and relaxing? And you should smile more!
Yes but there's an existing stereotype of men who want nothing but to get laid, that's why it's relevant in this case. Context matters
Edit: THEY EXIST. Doesn't mean all men are like that. You guys are too sensitive lol. I'm thinking pickup artists and other guys who completely objectify women.
I can't possibly be doing the jerkoff gesture any harder than I'm doing it right now. Oh, the poor lonely men...
go back to reddit
edit: every single fucking time I open the user profile for somebody who posted some low-effort spew like this ITT, they're all up in whitepeopletwitter. curious... 🤔
"gesture"
Wait, what? I thought it was about camaraderie as well. I mean, yeah, I wish I was getting laid but I’d honestly rather have a community of people around me who provide mutual support to each other.
Yeah, I don't know what the tumblr user in the screenshot is talking about. That's just not what people mean when they talk about the male loneliness epidemic. Seems like they just want to put others down while dishing out useless, hollow advice ..."be enjoyable"... lmao wow they solved it, great thanks.
Turns out "leftist" take-generators are not immune to making up bullshit to mock & deride for social clout
Misandry is sadly pretty common.
If it's a conversation about 3rd spaces and a lack of opportunities for IRL social interaction in modern society, I think it's more apt and more productive to just call it a loneliness epidemic. People who are not cis-men have the same problems of not being able to access affordable, pleasant places to socialize in their communities. Calling it the "male" loneliness epidemic just leads to animosity and division where there should be solidarity.
It's not just about getting laid, but there are of course incels that make it all about that.
Male loneliness is about camaraderie. If it was about getting laid, then prostitution would solve it. Busting a nut isn't gonna fix a psychological problem facing the adult male population in modern western society and this shitty tumblr post isn't gonna either. Its down right perpetuating it. Now, some truth is there; COMPANIONSHIP (not not getting laid) is a wonderful thing and does help, but the root of the problem is societal.
While I agree sex on its own is not enough, I partially disagree that its not important. I do legitimately think a lot of this anxiety among currently non-sex having men would be significantly reduced if prostitution was commonly available, legal, not stigmatized (for either party), and safe.
As it stands it is none of those things, at least in most places.
Another way to put it is that our culture is creating a lot of men who no one wants to be around. Who either don't see themselves as needing to be likable or who see being likable as something that goes completely against their identity -- something that is 'impossible' for them that they refuse to work on.
A lot of this may be tied to ideas of masculinity that see social awareness, empathy and cooperation as feminine traits since 'tough guys' in media can get 'respect' and attention despite eschewing all of those traits.
If you feel particularly lacking in those traits, it can feel very reassuring to tell yourself you can't work on those things and it's unfair to be judged or suffer consequences for deficiencies in them - because there is no escaping the sense of vulnerability one feels when trying to build up something one is weak in.
So we end up with a lot of guys who are sullen about being miserable and being miserable to be around.
These guys have a lot of hard work ahead of them. The first big hurdle is accepting that they have to be responsible for becoming people that others like being around - and getting over their safety blanket idea that they 'can't' so they shouldn't bother.
Idk about other but for me, perosnally its about a romantic relationship.
I started trying to solve my lonliness like 8 years ago now, i followed the advice, i worked on myself as a person, my hegiene my appearance, bot my mental and physical health, i picked up some hobbies, got out of my shell, made some great freinds that i love and love me... but still no romantic partner. Im happy with myself but say when I travel no matter how much i enjoy it theres always that thought in the back of my mind that i dont have anyone to enjoy it with, im not going to have anyone to look back at these times fondly with and it really gets me and puts a sour mood on oretty much anything i do and it feels like my time to find someone is quickly running out.
I feel like this type of reply to the male loneliness epidemic (or y'know just the loneliness epidemic, since loneliness has been on the rise independent of gender) really does not give a shit about the people that experience loneliness by reducing them to the most horrible and loud of subset of them.
Sure, there are incels that will twist and turn every societal tragedy into why they are victims and deserve to keep hating women. But by listening to them and reducing the entire problem to hahaha, the women haters are getting what they deserve, you are just hurting everyone else.
I agree that we need to treat men (and indeed everyone, we're all victims) with compassion and care. However, I think these conversations often turn into tone policing our own community more than those who attack it
In progressive spaces, we need to make room for anger and negative emotion because they are how we express the injustices of the world. The problem is, how do we allow people to express that anger safely, without causing harm. To that, I don't know the answer, but I have personally found art quite helpful
Idk, I'm trying to also be sympathetic to that anger because it often comes from a place of hurt
I...simply don't know what to make of this. I'm a guy who finds himself thinking about the male loneliness epidemic a lot, and never in terms of finding a romantic/sexual partner. It's always about solid platonic bonds outside of that and kin, and factors that make those harder to find and maintain these days.
Is this just a shitpost and I'm too stupid to get the joke?
You are thinking about the actual meaning of the male loneliness epidemic, whereas many people online are thinking about the buzzword loneliness epidemic which has been peddled in manospheres as "women hate men so we can't get laid."
You're not stupid, you just can't see the bottom of the hole from all the way up here.
Ahhh, k. Didn't know (though not surprised) the term is being used in that context. Suppose that says something about what I'm exposing myself to these days, so that's good to know.
Appreciate it!
It's plain old misandry. They like to pretend this is the default, but look at the comments and it's all men saying no it's the first.
It's way more than a sex issue. Getting laid is easy, if you only care about getting your dick wet. Making and keeping friends, especially meaningful friendships, is getting harder and harder. Anyone who reduces it down to "lol who cares about incels not getting laid" is being bad faith dismissive about a massive problem.
This, it's just propaganda to say it's just about incels
I would say that getting laid is easy for most people if they have no standards (or very low standards). I have to be attracted to the person, too, or else it doesn't work for me.
I didn't live in the 50s or before the 50s, but I think anything past the television time means shitty, non meaningful, relationships.
Making and keeping friends, especially meaningful friendships, is getting harder and harder.
Isn't that kind of a self fabricated epidemic though? Seems like if it was just about struggling to make friends, and there's a demographic of like minded people who are lonely, then isn't the onus of befriending each other held by the demographic itself?
I feel like it's a group of people who are bad at pingpong complaining to people about being bad at pingpong and expecting someone else to do something about it. Like, why not just play ping together until your better. An over simplified analogy of course, but my point is if what you say is true, I don't really know what people are upset about.
Isn't that kind of a self fabricated epidemic though?
Not necessarily. Societal factors play a huge role in how relationships with other people are formed. Places where people can naturally make deep lasting friendships are hard to come by right now. And just because two people are lonely does not mean they will make good friends. That would be wonderful if it was true, but there is more to building a friendship than just "I don't have a friend and you don't have a friend."
Our society has a tendency to look at issues like this and say "well that just sounds like it's all their own fault" without taking the thought further. WHY is this happening to so many people? And what can we do to better prepare young men to make lasting friendships and support each other more? The reason this has become more and more of an issue is specifically because people just put the blame on individuals, who don't feel like they have the tools or opportunities to fix these issues. Then all it takes is for right wing propaganda to say "hey here is where the issue is, it's because of feminism! You were right! It's not your fault!" And because they are the only ones telling them that men are moving to the right in droves.
Making and keeping friends, especially meaningful friendships, is getting harder and harder.
Have you seen the reaction these "male loneliness epidemic" guys have when a girl says they just want to be friends? Sorry, but there's no way you're trying to pass it off as "no it's not about sex guys really they just want close friends and rainbows" with a straight face.
Is the male loneliness epidemic not generally understood to be the first thing? Also platonic female friends are actually the best, it's crazy how willing women are compared to dudes to hype you up and support you when your primary motivation for the friendship isn't sex.
Haha! Hey, look! Men expressing feelings in comments and getting attacked by alphas and women for doing so! Next post on askmen - "Why are men so closed in and do not share their feelings?"
Maybe some are making it about getting laid, but overwhelmingly most men struggling with it have completely different reasons for why it is happening, in many cases outside of their power.
I'm lonely because my male friends turned into incredible assholes during the pandemic, became predatory creeps and started sharing videos of Andrew Tate. So I dumped them.
I miss 'hanging out with the boys' nights eating wings with beer while estiver l watching sports, or having barbecues, or playing board games or video games.
I have a LOT of lady friends now, though. But it's not the same.
🫂
That sucks man. Its never an easy thing to lose a friend, nevermind a whole bunch of them.
Man... the dude was my friend since my early teens. We were like brothers. We drifted a bit apart after he moved in the suburbs and had a family. It was hard to hang out with work and everything. He was like the central hub of a group of friends from those early teens.
We had a group chat and new people joined in. Friends of theirs. During the pandemic some became vehemently anti-mask, or anti-vax. It was extremely difficult and awkward when we got back together coming out of the pandemic when it was still a hot topic. One of the guys is a far-right religious type and started pushing Fox News and Andrew Tate clips in the chat and the others either became outraged (in the wrong way, like in agreement with Fox News) or started agreeing with Tate.
Then my best bud became vehemently LGBTQ-phobic. Like it became a conspiracy where they were trying to indoctrinate his kids, 2 girls. Became outraged at trans people and anything related to that.
I tried to talk some sense into them, but it was really not working. They very quickly got deeper into this shit through YouTube videos and their fucking algorithms that keeps pushing more far-right content than anything else. Then it went out of control.
When the other far-right guy posted a Fox News clip about the female olympic boxer who could be disqualified because she was failing a test for testosterone or something, Fox saying she was a trans woman, my friend lost his shit. I didn't have any more energy to talk any sense in him so I just quit the group chat and never spoke to him or the group again.
I spent some awesome times with those guys and have fond memories of hanging out with them. Sharing DragonBalls mangas, playing GoldenEye 007 on the N64 and later playing Halo on the X-Box together. Watching stupid b-movies and awesome anime. Going out to sports bars together. Playing basketball. Etc.
I feel so lonely right now. I don't have any friends like them any more and it's really weighing down on my depression. I only have the one friend from high school left who's normal, but he's flaky and often cancels on our plans or is always 1h late to dinners and events. He also never calls me. I'm always the one calling him. He's not doing too well either so maybe that's why.
Anyway. Thank you for reading through this if you did.
Don't settle for weak men, make them man up for you.
Mr. Tate, funny seeing you here!
I sincerely hope no man makes the mistake of going near you.
I think it is funny how you post this, then in the comments deny that this is the type of opinion someone like you, a proud leftist feminist have, and that it is actually most men who think like this.
depends on your circles. in feminist and leftist circles, it usually means the first but most men outside of those circles use it just to mean “im not getting the dates i am ENTITLED to 😡"
If that is the case, why did you make this post? What was the purpose of your post if this isn't how you think about lonely men? What did you want to achieve with it? I can tell you, that you're not going achieve anything positive.
I assume you'd like to be treated with respect and compassion yourself since you have that blåhaj attached to you. That respect and compassion is a two way street.
The fact that SOME men feel entitled to women doesn't mean that most men think or feel like that. The loneliness many men (and women for that matter) feel is very real and it is a far bigger and more complex issues than just "lawl, can't get laid".
I personally know what it is like to be mistreated by very bad men. It left deep scars on me that I have to carry for life. However, I promised myself that I would not become a man hater back when I was going through my trauma. I refused to let a couple of asshole determine how I would meet the world and the men in it. It would be unfair to those who had never done a thing to me and it would be unfair to myself because I was better than that.
You too are better than this and you either have to start treat all people with respect and compassion if you want the same in return or you need to own that it is in fact not "most men" who think like this, it is you who think like this. Stand by your convictions and own them or change course because you know that what you're putting out into the world right now is ugly and reductive.
I believe you're misreading their posts. In the text that you quoted, they say, "I think f(X)
and g(X)
both exist. I think that X
is actually two populations: X
a and X
b."
You've quoted this to say, "if you don't think g(X)
exists then why did you post??"
(f(X)
is men who want friendship, g(X)
is men who want sex, X
a is men in feminist circles, X
b is men not in feminist circles.)
It's still a stupid way to look at it.
First of all: male feminists can indeed feel entitled to women as well as men who aren't feminist can just feel socially lonely and not being obsessed with women who don't date them.
I think it is dumb to have leftist and feminism as a criteria for a man being a good person or not. It is a reductive way to think about the issue and very tribalistic.
Second of all: There are many people out there, not just men, who aren't obsessed with the culture war, who still struggle with loneliness and the problem is multi faceted. Off the top of my head these are some of the issues I spot in the developed world that causes the loneliness epidemic:
These are just the first few issues that pop into my mind as part of the bigger issue with the loneliness epidemic.
To boil this issue down to "men outside of leftist and feminist circles are just mad they can't get laid" is so fucking stupid I don't even have words for it. My point still stands.
person who wrote this sounds like an insensitive asshole.
That's the joke (I'm hoping). The dude starts off as if he's sympathetic and caring, and then the moment he finds the opening (the emotional vulnerability of another is exposed) he rams home the blade in his friend's/fellow-man's back.
I don't think it was meant as a joke.
Yeah, the way it finishes, it really doesn't sound like a joke. If it is a joke, its a pretty bad one.
I didn't ask to have BPD. I didn't ask for inability to regulate emotions. I can only be me. I definitely cannot pretend to be relaxed or fun. That's not just me. Relaxed side of me comes out slowly.
I am not asking for every woman to date me or even go out with me. All I am asking for is a bit of empathy. But if that's too much, well. I cannot change anyone's mind.
p.s., I wish I were not born. But, that is out of my hands too.
This post is not talking about you, don't worry about it.
As a man experiencing a lack of friendship, camaraderie, and emotion connection, regardless of fault or cause, the OP reduces that experience to "not getting laid". That affects me regardless of never actually using the phrase "male loneliness epidemic" to describe anything, of whether I fall into some 100 pages of "exceptions", or that the post doesn't explicitly say "those experiences don't exist". To say that the OP doesn't actually communicate that is to simply close one's eyes to an inconvenient truth of how people work.
Being told something has an impact. Even if it can be rationalized as "not about me". Even if what was said isn't what was intended. Even if some comments express support for people like me (and ignoring everyone who doubles down on it). Even if "big boy learns people say mean things sometimes". What do you think that impact is gonna be here? For someone sharing my experiences who doesn't stop to dig into this post, I doubt that impact is to move them towards being the sort of healthy, happy person we'd want.
No, it's actually the first but being shoved aside and ignored as the second.
Also the ableism of calling it a "skill issue" and disregarding people with depression and social anxiety.
I had trouble dating because I would have to get up and go to the bathroom every 5 minutes because I was sick from anxiety. That makes it a little hard to be "enjoyable and relaxing".
I think it’s good to discuss our feelings. Men have socially reinforced the exact opposite amongst themselves and had it imposed on them by others. We’ve all heard “boys don’t cry, man up” etc. I worked with a young man who thought he was mad all the time. We broke through that, he was having so many emotions he didn’t know how to label because he simply wasn’t encouraged in that direction. That, I think, is incredibly lonely.
Stack on top of that growing up behind a computer screen, surrounded by manfluencers giving questionable advice, having your formative years recorded and picked apart…not being able to make those early awkward social interactions because of covid for a lot of young men as well…yeah.
Of course I think it does get conflated with a lack of intercourse or whatever. Young women are feeling abused by their lack of rights and they view what would traditionally be awkward young love/courtship as a threat. Incel ideology used to be fridge, but there are a disturbing number of young men embracing these ideas. All while women’s reproductive options are limited, making intimacy more difficult for everyone.
So there’s this historical precedent of not opening up, but boys started to learn not to do that anymore. Just in time to get shut down. It’s not girls fault, it’s not boys fault, it sucks. But I don’t see it improving until intimacy feels safe for everyone again.
This is gonna sound crazy but I've had some incredibly lonely sex where I haven't felt connected, intimate or seen by my partner.
omg welcome to being gay, yeah you can have sex instantly 24/7 but it's absolutely soulless and soul destroying in a lot of cases. Intimacy is what people what but can't figure out how to have. That's true in every form of relationship.
you can have sex instantly 24/7
Fuck me. Conservatives told me gay was a choice. And here I picked the wrong team.
omg welcome to being gay, yeah you can have sex instantly 24/7
Either you're male, things have changed a LOT since I found a steady partner, or I'm really bad at this.
I don't think that sounds crazy at all. I wish that this sentiment were discussed more freely in society, because I hate the stereotype that men only care about pure physicality in sex (and the corresponding stereotype that women only care about emotional connection).
Same, it was like a one night stand but with someone I had known and slept with before. I call it the n+1 night stand.
What? That's perfectly normal. First two times I had sex I was like, "THIS is what all the hoopla was about?!" Gf and I met at 17 and fucked like rabid wolverines. She had had the same experience! Two guys before me, meh.
Felt that way with my ex-wife. Woke one day, realized I was lonely as hell, with a wife and two kids! Thank god she left. Took the kids, had to fight like hell to get 'em back, but thank god she's gone. Proceeded to have many fine lovers over the next few years, landed my wife, could not be happier.
I love posts that explicitly state that my loneliness is entirely my fault, and not an unprecedented societal issue affecting more people than ever before
try less hard to get laid and try more hard to be an enjoyable and relaxing presence
Been doing that for 30 years. Is there another step?
Be alpha bro like u gotta jus b the alpha.
Not unless it involves giving out your credit card number.
Ironically, you do have to put in effort and search for the one
Where do you live? Do you do stuff with other people? How do you talk to them if you do?
I live in a city full of people and public transit; shit practically just happens to me. I showed up to a birthday party last year and autistic yapped my way into an entire new friend group in a matter of hours. Where I grew up, though, that wasn’t gunna happen because all I had was being isolated and it took driving into the city for dancing every week to build a decent group of friends on top of my two-three reliable best friends.
You're already doing better than a whole lot of people if you're getting invited to parties. Of the people I was at school, university, or work with, I'm the only one who bothers hosting parties, and that won't broaden my social circle as I already know everyone. Most people don't have enough living space to have more than a few people over and can't afford to cater for a bunch of extra people. Even for attending parties someone else hosts, travel and accommodation can be a pain. If you're not within taxi range and there isn't abundant late night public transport, you'll either need to not drink and then drive home, find a hotel, or hope the party is small enough that there'll be space to crash.
I don't think it's just about sex. I'm not even sure incels think that. I think it's more about relationships and someone to share your life with. I know some people seem fine with just friends and casual sex, but I think a lot of people have a need, or strong "want," for a close, deep, intimate relationship. I know I do at least. Even if it was just about sex, sex is pretty much a human need.
Personally, I have severe life-long social anxiety (and depression), so it's always been very hard for me to make friends or meet potential partners. I have worked on my anxiety issue (medication, attempts at self help, though I could never afford therapy), and I am better than before (I used to sometimes get panic attacks just being around large groups of people), but it's still severe enough to hinder me in life in general (and noticeable to people around me).
That's the thing about posts like this. They completely disregard mental illness. No, it's just a "skill issue". You just aren't trying hard enough! It's ableism.
if it's sweaty clammy heart racing social anxiety, propranolol can work wonders.
Mushrooms helped me a lot
Genuinely, who keeps posting shit like this on here? I keep seeing posts such as this one and it's honestly pushing me away from Lemmy. Why spend time on a platform that hates me? If being a man who didn't date (because of social anxiety, btw, not that you'd care, since clearly men are by default fascists, according to some comments here) is a sin, let us know on the front page, so that me and others like myself can avoid this place.
A lot of comments are, thankfully, calling this shitty behaviour out. But then I look at the post itself, which has 696 upvotes and 166 downvotes, and I'm like... I'm not wanted here.
Genuinely, who keeps posting shit like this on here?
it reads like a smug take from a shitlib clout chaser with zero nuance and zero understanding beyond the superficial to me, so that'd be my first guess.
there are a whole lot of them out there, making everything around them worse.
It's no better anywhere. I bet the same people who post this shit also removed and moan about men staying away from leftist spaces. I am liberal, but I don't kid myself about what these people think of me.
Don't let the vote ratio on the post turn you away. I'm pretty sure most people assume tumblr is cringe, so a cringe post isn't going to be downvoted to oblivion.
Why spend time on a platform that hates me?
This platform's demographic is overwhelmingly men who are enthusiastic about tech....... not exactly a population known for being a bunch of Casanovas.
Kinda feels like you are taking a post originally made on a different platform kinda personal. Judging by some of the comments there are plenty of dudes who don't date because of social anxiety, and there seems to be some regurgitating incel propaganda.
Maybe the OG poster shouldn't speak in absolutes, however I think it's a reasonable criticism as a lot of the ideology surrounding "male loneliness" was created/utilized by right winged influencers to grow their viewership.
Daaaaamn this one hit you right in the testicles didn't it?
Everyone take note, how it is completely ignoring the 'oh yeah this is totally fucked' part and crying about how it cant get fucked. This is what happens every time. Always. Abd its up votes are positive. Which means a majority of the men here are this gross. A wide majority. This is why women don't want to fuck fuck you; the straightest woman in the world woukd die of serotonin syndrome before she choked down enough zofran to put up with this shit and still be aroused. You all just skip over the part about needing to maje close connections while gwtting in touch woth your feelings and skip straight to being gross to women about how we won't fuck you.
But if this were really about needing to fuck and not misogyny, you'd stop whining at us and hop on grindr.
Your attitude is just proving my point further. The only benefit of the doubt I can give you is that you can't comprehend what I was saying. Also, as far as I know, isn't Grindr for LGBTQ+? If so, why would I go there? I am straight. Or do you think straight men should "stop whining" and date other men? How is this different from conservatives telling gay people to just not be gay?
At the very least, thank you for letting me know I shouldn't be spending time on Lemmy. Keep acting like this and then complain about people using non-Fediverse sites. I'm just done. Enjoy Lemmy, the home of double standards and hatred. I won't take part in it any longer.
If you are male and lonely but it is because of social anxiety, why do you feel attacked by this? You have a different, external reason for being lonely than the broad swath of the criticism.
Why do you feel attacked by this if it is advocating for circumstances (men improving their interelational dynamics to build deeper friendships) that would likely improve your opportunities to comfortably challenge your social anxiety?
If you feel attacked, is it because your attitude is the problem being criticized? That rather than seeing your social anxiety as your burden to overcome, you instead see it as a reason that society owes you access to the company of women you find attractive - that at the heart of it, you feel aggreived that women don't have to pick you?
Because these posts lump all men without relationships together. Does the Tumblr user above make any mention of exceptions? Nope. The post boils down to men who didn't date didn't succeed because "skill issue". This would imply that regardless of any other possible causes, I am deserving of ridicule because I don't live life like you.
You yourself make assumptions about me. I was right to say "because of social anxiety, btw, not that you'd care", because immediately here's a reply that implies my social anxiety is not real, or it is but it's not relevant. You assume the worst of me because I dare not have a girlfriend. This is precisely the issue. I've long since moved on from pursuing dating. I don't care if I never have a girlfriend anymore. However, what I do care is if people assume I'm a horrible piece of shit because of it.
Long story short, your comment is case in point: It does not matter what I say. My reply to you is useless. I never had a girlfriend and therefore anything I say is discarded because I have to be an asshole in order for that to be the case.
If you are male and lonely but it is because of social anxiety, why do you feel attacked by this?
I'm not ElPsyKongroo, but I feel personally attacked by this because it calls me out specifically:
to all the men out there not getting laid: try less hard to get laid and try more hard to be an enjoyable and relaxing presence
They're directly adressing me. Of course I take offense.
If you feel attacked, is it because your attitude is the problem being criticized?
It's because my attitude is being ignored. I do try to be as pleasant as possible to be around. My social anxiety is my burden to overcome, but the annihilation of third places and the skyrocketing income inequality preventing people from having the time or money to date is a societal problem that contributes heavily to this trend. I really like the implication that if I'm upset about this situation, it must mean that I want the government to force women to date me
Unfortunately, in addition to being discouraged from camaraderie and bonding, many boys and young men are also discouraged from ever developing the emotional security needed to see, or outwardly acknowledge that they are lonely and suffering from their lack of connections to others beyond sex.
They are instead taught that any form of vulnerability (like acknowledging their unmet need for connection) is weakness they should be ashamed of because it's unbecoming of a man
We really do men and boys a huge disservice :(. Sometimes you hear the idea that we should "teach men not to rape, rather than teach women to protect themselves", but I've never heard anyone talk about how in practice what that would look like, is raising emotionally healthy and secure, interpersonally competent boys, who are equipped to handle difficult emotional situations and the hormones that will show up as teenagers.
Not everything comes down to how men are taught. These men made bad decisions for their cultural and interpersonal growth, and until they stop making those bad decisions, they're unfuckable, and that's good.
There being causes for someone's cruelty doesn't change their responsibility for it, but understanding those causes is vital if you wish to do anything about the fact that it is a persistent societal issue.
I don't think ill socialized, emotionally unwell, harmful people should be fuckable, I think that we need to recognize that they are ill socialized, and emotionally unwell, if we'd like there to be fewer harmful people in the future.
They were so close to understanding the cause... Then they decided to just be a judgemental prick.
no, make loneliness epidemic is exactly what's described in the first post. societal norms mostly hinder men from forming meaningful friendships with other men, and women as well. they're discouraged from expressing feelings (maybe other than aggressive ones) and being vulnerable. i don't know how you can form any relationships without doing either. and turns out you really can't. hence a lot of men feel lonely.
If that’s the definition, then this “epidemic” has been the case since forever. You think guys in the 1950’s were opening up and being vulnerable?
In the past, it was expected that men would have closer relationships with each other. Then we had the whole backlash against the hippie movement and it became "gay" and "bad" to swap handjobs with your bros in the basement den.
If you really want to be pedantic with your analogies, there's an epidemic among both men and women but men are hit worse due to a preexisting condition.
Semi related but it's actually so irritating how I have to go through life where my value as a human being is decided by how much money I make, how many girls I get, how successful I am when I could not care less about any of that, but I will get judged severely for it if anyone "finds out" that I'm not successful in... things I don't care about...
Like why is that my value to people? I don't want to have kids with you, you don't have to live my life, if it's fun and rewarding being around me why is that not enough? It seeps in even to progressive speech where people will say "clearly he gets no women" like that decides their value as a person. Very cringe. Also don't forget to downvote for minimizing male loneliness as men can't get women for the 9999th time.
All people ever ask is when I'm getting married, why I got no removed, so on.
Oh my god shut the fuck up.
Like why is that my value to people?
I mean, have you experienced how dumb, empty, and shallow a very great number of people are?
OK, but...no? That's not what people are talking about with the male loneliness epidemic. They're talking about how an inability to connect with their peers on a more than superficial level, coupled with a lack of older male role models, are causing Gen Z and Millennial men to report extremely high levels of loneliness.
It's tangentially related to, "getting laid," as many of these men are driven towards misogynistic monosphere influencers who make sexual conquest a measure of self-worth, but that's a symptom of the problem, not the totality of it. Also, some people debate the existence of the loneliness epidemic altogether, but no one defines it as, "men aren't getting laid."
I think theres also more competition for people's attention than in previous generations, as well as increasing responsibilities as aging population and wealth disparity increased in proportion.
Yeah, for sure. Also, I should be clear that I'm not certain how much I believe in the male loneliness epidemic. I think a lot of it can be explained as people who were conditioned to view themselves as the primary earners having to cope with the conditions of late stage capitalism. But I think that representing the male loneliness epidemic as, "men aren't getting laid," is a fundamental misunderstanding of the argument, and ironically, what the original commenter thought of when they first heard of male loneliness is a much more accurate description than what they think, "people really meant by it."
Mandatory "If you're homeless just buy a house"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Jh0EN1De4Q
The good thing about being unable to get a partner due to lack of social skill is that it doesn't cost anything other than time to improve your skills. The other good thing is that if you don't have time to improve your skills, you don't need a partner to live.
You need housing to live, so it isn't a good comparison.
to all the men out there not getting laid: try less hard to get laid and try more hard to be an enjoyable and relaxing presence
As someone who spent a full seven years as a horny teenager, I'm afraid to report this is much more difficult than it sounds on paper.
But I'll spot you something that can help a lot
close camaraderie and bonding between men
Honestly, the most success I've had with women was when I was surrounded by male friends who left me feeling relaxed and confident.
I am in a relationship, but also lonely. I would like someone to share relationship-problems with for when they occur every once in a while. But it's hard.
Don't believe all the crap you see on TikTok and talk to actual people about their problems. Please.
Please don't isolate yourself to your partner only
You need friends
Lemmy's relationship advice would be "have you downloaded linux?" Instead of reddits "divorce them."
To be fair. Most relationships are so contextual actual advice from internet people can be hard.
Good luck bb. I got lucky and found a great communicator. Literally first time a relationship hasn't felt like pulling teeth. Actual love instead of transactional. But it all started with communication. With my oddities, with theirs.
Have you found anything that worked? I also find myself in those once-in-a-while situations. But when I cant share them, they feel way more frequent and overwhelming and then it's just spiraling from there.
Fortunately a friend has almost miraculously became suddenly way more understanding and talkative. Would hope for the same happening to you.
If you want you can message me. I am a great listener and I usually am someone who seems to give good advice to my friends.
Anecdotal, but I struggle with connecting with people in person. I try to do the 'be yourself' thing, the 'talk about what you like' malarkey, all that stuff. I have watched eyes glaze over and interest recede in real time simply because I answered, truthfully and wholly, the question of "what do you like to do?" To boil it down to two words that don't cover any specifics or explore any deeper aspects: experimental music. There are others, but that's the biggest hat I choose to wear.
So I've instead closed in on myself when I'm in public, especially at work. Don't speak unless spoken to, keep to myself, and just keep hands on the keyboard and eyes on the screen. And then I go home, to try to reach out to any of the local friends I do have - friends that love me and have told me, directly, often, that I'm a comforting and relaxing presence in their often chaotic and confusing lives - to try to gain a moment of in-person, face-to-face contact. Too busy, too far, they need space to take care of themselves. The last thing I, or anyone, wants is for me to be needy. I do not, and have never, faulted anyone for how they navigate their own slice of the shit pile called life they have to deal with.
But I'm living alone for the first time in my life through no choice of my own. Connecting to new people, whether it is just for friendship, or, even more unlikely, romantic endeavors, more often than not feels like talking to a brick. Not even a wall made of bricks - a singular, boring, uninspiring brick. They have no interest in what I am or am about, and I struggle to find any kind of connection to what they have to say.
So, I stay lonely. I know I'm the problem, but I don't want anyone else to help me deal with it.
I think this is still a skills issue, the question is "what skill?"
You have a passionate interest. What you don't know how to do is talk about it in a way that shares why it is so fascinating to you. That can be worked on. It'll take practice, including more times where you flop, but you can try to watch how people with other niche interests pull people in and create intrigue and excitement.
Trying to learn this skill for your passion will help you do it more generally; it will make you a more interesting person that people enjoy connecting to.
++ but I think it can't be overstated how much effort social skills takes. Especially if you're starting from near zero.
Well, maybe you are not the whole problem.
The way I see it, is "be yourself" means keep your interests and philosophy. When you are talking with someone else, you want to sell your interests, make them sound exiting like how you feel about the topic.
A good example of what not to do is when you are talking to the bricks. They are not selling their interests in such a way that you are getting anything out of it.
Now maybe they are selling them and you just aren't buying it. That is fine too. There is nothing saying that a perfect sales pitch will land.
the problem is that no oNE HAS ANY MONEY TO DO ANYTHING
That is certainly part of the problem, but I know plenty of guys with decent money who are quite unhappy with their lack of relationships
Yea, you can't be the only person around that has any money. Other people have to have money too, so that they will go places.
The fact that you need significant funds to generally socialize is the problem
I have a wife and I don't feel lonely.
But I noticed my third place "go to" places are very lonely and they were a place I use to be to socialise randomly.
Backthen: Going to the gym was an adventure, blast some weights and grab a cappucino with someone on the way out and talk about the routine, how they are progressing etc... PEOPLE TALKED.
Now? Everyone on the phones during sets, if they aren't doing that they run around with headphones and walk and use the phone,..
It's everywhere. I am not different now.
But trust me guys and ladies, it's not having no partner. It's the phones, it's the phones. If they'd shutdown the internet people won't be dating anymore and the human race would just end cause people can't communicate in person anymore.
I think it’s mostly a time issue. Used to be much easier but with recession, inflation, housing crisis, constant layoffs at least I am much busier than I was e.g. 10 years ago.
The little time I have for going to the gym I kinda don’t feel like talking to people I’ll probably never see again. Because I’m also in one of those subscription things where you actually don’t have to be member of a specific gym anymore, you can just go anywhere they partner with. And I think lots of people are doing that nowadays, plus with all the layoffs people move around even more than they used to.
I think phones do play a role but they aren’t the only thing that keeps us from socializing.
No, at least not everyone.
I use phone or headphone to avoid talking to people. To minimize the risk of what you said you use to do might happen to me.
Not everyone loves being social. And I'm one of those people from before the internet. So phones didn't make me this way.
I’ve experienced crippling social anxiety In person and major depression but at 40 have found that connecting with a few people that I share the same interests with has been the biggest de-lonelifier.
It isn’t even a deep connection necessarily, we don’t talk about private stuff very much but we are just comfortable talking and sharing gaming, watching sports together etc.
I think if I didn’t have the small group of people I spend time with on Discord (voice and screen share) I would feel this loneliness much deeper.
It’s all just luck in finding the right people though. I can’t say I tried to find this group I just never turned down getting to know people and the pandemic meant Discord was the only way to interact.
The main point is it might not be “intimate” connection and more a comfortable connection where you can just spend time doing the usual things you like to do together. But computer gaming is unique in that way. I think voice chats with people you have stuff in common with is one way to find something if someone is looking for it. But complaining on message boards is not the same as talking with someone.
People who make getting laid or not their whole personality are people that I would want nothing to do with.
I once overheard a guy loudly explaining the "sexual market" to his mom in a grocery store. He probably still has no idea why nobody finds him attractive.
is it ok if i don't judge my sense of manhood by the "getting laid" part ?
i'm not into judging womanhood by using male anything, and i don't see why the other way makes any more sense.
I'm with the second guy. I'm not going to doom scroll through useless dating apps and talking to every woman on the street. I'd rather do my own hobbies and do my own things so worst case scenario, I'm happy with what I'm doing, best case scenario I get a SO, or reasonable scenario is I make some friends.
Funny. I always thought it was a camaraderie thing because I'm married. That definitely makes a lot of sense though because young men are becoming more right-wing and most women do not like that so it seems like that would be a big hurdle and maybe they just need to figure their shit out.
There was an interesting podcast the other day about raising boys in the current era when it seems like many of them are turning to far right grifters and manfluencers
The fact that men are turning to Far Right Grifters is tragic. They're not doing it because they're horrible people, they're doing it because they're being left behind by everyone and only noticed by the Joe Rogans of the world.
If we had a guy on the Left who looked at men and say "I don't know who you are, or what's going on, but you my friend are enough and it's not your fault you're struggling.", we wouldn't have Man-O-Sphere bullshit
Instead we blame men for all of the world's problems, and double down when they side with the only people who aren't calling them incels. People who ironically, are actively turning them into
"They treated me like an animal, so that's what I became." seems to be the mindset between those brainwashed by the Man-O-Sphere
Part of my reason for thinking this is I'm trans and when I presented as a guy, I got treated like shit, nearly got kicked out of college over a bullshit claim (That was thankfully proven bullshit, which is why I said nearly got kicked out) that I stalked a female classmate. But once I grew tits, suddenly everyone was quick to tell me how much I mattered and that it "gets better", people complimented me, people held doors open for me.... Sure I probably make less than my male coworkers, but at least I feel like I matter.
When you're a man, you're assumed guilty because the world sees things through a Pink and Blue lens, anyone Pink is a victim, anyone Blue is an abuser.
And quite frankly, it's not healthy for anyone.
Trans masc friends tell me that one of the things they miss most about presenting as women is drunk girl solidarity in nightclub bathrooms. Until I was a part of that conversation, I didn't realise how much I cherish these moments. Hearing this helped me to understand the loneliness of being a man far more than I did before.
I think that there are men on the left who leverage their platforms to reach out to men as you describe, but the problem is that their reach is far more limited because compassion doesn't sell as effectively as outrage bait; Manosphere content is incredibly skilled at creating a vicious cycle in which they incite anger in viewers, and, having nowhere to channel this anger effectively, it threatens to turn to despair, leading emotionally vulnerable viewers to return to the Manosphere, to "re-up" their rage. In the short term, it seems to offer some catharsis, but it fosters an odd dependence. The compassionate men on the left are more likely to resist this kind of dependence cycle (such as through taking steps to avoid unhealthy parasocial relationships with viewers, even if said relationships would make sponsorships more lucrative.
When the vast majority of everyone other than said grifters et al offers boys nothing but contempt and prejudice, they make them easy pickings for the only people offering them something else, even if they're lying.
It's similar to the reason that a guy who never gets attention from women is likely to 'fall in love' and immediately develop a strong infatuation for the first woman to pay attention to him.
Trying to be a relaxing presence is a bit of a paradox
I don't know that there are many people I would describe as "relaxing". There was one dude I knew in college who was high all the time. He was pretty relaxing, I guess.
I'm assuming what they mean is the guy isn't setting off any red flags.
Trans guy here - in part what I think might be meant is the pressure of expected romance. Like it is certainly a thing when younger AFAB people are trying to find regular old cis male companionship that there's often this sort of pressure where you can tell when someone is crushing on you and it's a matter of if and when they make their move. That time can be dreaded because a lot of the time once someone makes their move if the romantic advance isn't accepted the friendship disappears and the feeling left behind is that you were never a friend at all. That you were tricked into valuing a friendship that wasn't real because it was a down payment on an expected return of sexual or romantic affection.
And yes, I am aware it's awkward and hard to stay around someone who rejected you romantically. It's also hard to lose a friend because of something you had literally no control over and to mourn that. Sticking around and remaining a friend and getting past your romantic flop is a service to all sides involved if what you actually feel is cut off from friendship. Otherwise it really makes the assertion that this isn't about sex ring very hollow.
In my 20's an asexual closeted trans person who counted men as my tribe and wanted nothing but friends that felt normal and lasted - at one point I got so desperate I agreed to a sexless "romantic" relationship by way of fear of losing my best friend. Even though my "boyfriend" was a perfect gentleman during the time we were "together" I ended up in a two year long situationship that in the end felt skeezy and colors that time of my life in a sense of wrongness. I never developed romantic feelings and that whole set up ended up being sickening and oppressive. After it ended that friendship became remote and I lost what I valued somewhere along the line anyway.
It doesn't surprise me that so many women aren't all that empathetic to the male loneliness epidemic even though in this post it is being expressed in a really shit way. It doesn't take many guys dumping you on your ass simply because they got attracted to you and decided not to stick around afterwards before you start feeling like their lonely heart is not your problem to solve. It feels just like if you had a friend who was using you for your money or some sort of service you were providing. Feeling used and discarded is traumatic. People who get hurt this way start getting very suspicious of new friendships and maintain distance because they are guarding from getting hurt again.
In summary - It's really hard to relax around someone who is coming at you with an expectation you might not be able to meet. The more obvious it is the more you can potentially save yourself the trouble of not getting invested early.
Im a lonely man at the dinner table with my wife and extended family.
Male loneliness is real and multifactorial, but yeah its also self fulfilling. Rather than examine difficult societal reasons and address them, we fall back on tired masculine tropes and try to blame women for not being accomodating or whatever.
Most don't blame women, it's mostly the loudmouths online that do that. There are a huge number of men suffering in silence. They often know it's them, but don't know how to start fixing it.
I help out with a charity focused on men's mental health. It's both depressing how many men suffer, and great to watch them "find their tribe" and start resolving it.
I'm trying really hard to not reduce the issue to "women won't have sex with me" but the responses are flooded with this general sentiment.
I think some guys suffer from mental illness and don't have support from the people around them and things like male privilege can diminish their perceived suffering. Even so, I rarely see men actually talk about it.
Like, only on places like 4chan people are brave enough to spew whatever shit's on their mind and I'll tell you that while they can be the minority in a lot of regards, there is something sincere in their unfiltered, crude language that really helps me understand it a little. A lot of it does feel like whinning about sexlessness, but sometimes they make a point and actually talk about their suffering.
It seems like men are desperate for sex and, in pursuit, find grifters who peddle them conservatism. These are the type of people that come to my mind when we talk about it.
At the risk of oversimplifying this issue, I feel it's important to make a distinction between "men who are desperate for sex" (if that were all it was, it would be a VERY easy problem to fix), and men who expect to have someone constantly by their side who is available to have sex whenever they want while not having or expressing any needs of their own. Because that's simply not how relationships work. There's a ton of men who think like that regardless of conservative tradwife rabbit holes, and they need to snap out of their little fantasy world.
While I fully agree there is a difference between "desperate for sex men" and "entitled to sex men", I would be willing to bet that one of the easiest groups to convert to the latter... is the former.
Not that I'm one to talk, I didn't fall down the pipeline during a decade long dry spell. So my anecdotal experience would lead me to believe there has to be other factors at play. But still, it's easier to tempt a hungry person to violence.
Ok, ok, ok. I know everyone likes anecdotes.
I don't fall in the lonely camp, but I'm definitely not getting laid.
Why am I not getting laid?
Well I used to think it was cause I was fat, but then I lost a ton of weight. Then I thought it was cause I wasn't fit so I put on muscle. Then I thought it was cause I was vampire pale so I got sunburned.
Reality is:
Sorry to hear that but congrats on your dick at least bro.
👈👈😎
But for real tho I wish it came with benefits as advertised
“A gentleman is someone who makes everyone around him feel as comfortable as possible” - Brendan Fraser in “Blast from the Past”
This is a pretty stupid take. Just stupid. Not much to add to this.
Much of my energy is spent trying to be an enjoyable presence and it god damn works as people seek my presence. Does this lead to sex? No, why would it?
Being an enjoyable presence in order to get sex makes absolutely no sense.
Wtf? How else are you supposed to get laid? Make friends, be interesting. Meet people. Lmao
Making friends in order to get laid? Yeah no. I have female friends and thanks god i did not befriend them with any sexual intentions. It is kind of funny that people pretend there is some kind of strategy to having sex when its basically: Showing interest at an appropriate level and this interest getting returned. Not much more to it.
Don't try to be something you're not.
I think this is one of those "All advice is bad advice, if you are behaving like a dumbass" situations.
So I shouldn't try not to be be ugly and unpleasant?