Skip Navigation
Political Memes @lemmy.world

Some of y'all are not ready to hear this...

414 comments
  • While I mostly agree with this, I have one significant hurdle I am unable to overcome. What other choice do I have?

    I can't stand most Democrats. They suck! But they are a far cry better than voting Republican. And voting for a third party feels like wasting my vote.

    If there was a third party candidate that focused on climate change and social issues and had even the slightest chance of winning, I would vote for them in a second. Until then, I am stuck voting for the lesser of two evils.

    • But they are a far cry better than voting Republican. And voting for a third party feels like wasting my vote.

      You just answered your own question.

      Democrats are FAR, FAR, FAR better than Republicans. We know this because the data shows they are better for our economy. We know this because their voting record shows that they regularly vote in favor of the middle and lower classes. We know this because they never attempted to violently overturn an election or send masked squads into our towns to abduct people off the street.

      No 3rd party is viable or will be viable anytime in the near future. It will take YEARS and YEARS for a 3rd party to start winning local/state elections and getting reps in the House and Senate. And that's IF a 3rd party actually starts putting in the work, which none are doing.

      So if you want to be smart, and actually help protect our democracy, then you should vote Democrat in national elections and maybe vote 3rd party in local elections to help them gain some traction and see if they can do anything with it.

      • We know this because the data shows they are better for our economy

        We know this because the data shows they are better for our economy rich people's money.

        FTFY.

        They're definitely not good for "our" money, meaning the 99% that works for a living, unless you're of the opinion that outright ignoring food and rent becoming cost-prohibitive is somehow good for "our" money.

    • You are giving consent when you vote. You are saying this choice is fine.

      Maybe America is at a point where voting is not the solution. How are things now compared to when the American revolution happened?

      Edit - people downvote this but 'voting for the lesser of two evils' is. What. Has. Got. You. Here.

      • You are giving consent when you vote. You are saying this choice is fine.

        Actually, when you vote, you just vote.

        That's it. It's not a magic ritual, you don't telepathically send your message to the Holy Ghost of Democracy when you vote, Anubis isn't going to weigh your ballot against a feather before deciding on the fate of your soul.

        You circle something or you don't and then you deal with whatever happens however you want.

      • They're all happy to gaslight themselves into thinking that they're the virtuous side, just like MAGA.

        Meanwhile tens of millions of Americans are working three jobs at 100 hours a week just to be able to rent a roach-infested studio, which in the minds of Democrats, is apparently a-okay because they did nothing meaningful about it.

        Also, everything you're seeing now, from normalized police brutality, to ICE raids, to black torture sites, to government-sponsored abductions ("extraordinary renditions"), to unilateral presidential warmaking... was all also done and supported by Democrats. Obama even killed an American with a drone strike. And, for more fun, go look up which president it was that appointed Tom Homan.

        The only difference is one side gives nicer speeches.

      • How are things now compared to when the American revolution happened?

        hahahahaha!!!1!

        Yes, that's totally a meaningful comparison. Like, let me put on my trilby*, check on my slaves while I ride a horse to town, and discuss the broadsheet nailed to the side of the tavern with the other white land-owning men.

        *tricorn

      • You are giving consent when you vote. You are saying this choice is fine.

        No, you are saying "Of the realistic choices I have I'm choosing what is BEST".

        Maybe America is at a point where voting is not the solution.

        Then do something about it. Talking about it on the internet is easy. You think modern Americans are going to revolt? Lol. Have fun with that.

        people downvote this but ‘voting for the lesser of two evils’ is. What. Has. Got. You. Here.

        No, what got us where we are right now is people crying about not wanting to vote for the lesser of two evils and allowing the real evil to waltz the fuck into power.

  • The Tea Party fundamentally and radically transformed the GOP. It can be done.

    Unfortunately, the Democratic constituency is too impatient and too distractable and stupid to do it. The GOP has been playing the long game since Reagan, and they are good at messaging and good at being happy with incremental wins. Dem constituent groups are great at swinging for the fences every 4 years and failing, and great at circular firing squads of blame and purity testing. They suck at having allies that agree with them on 95% of the issues. They suck at getting on the bus come election time. They have been trained to be this way by the GOP.

    Time was, unions were the counterweight to the capitalist forces, and were the effective counterweight. Everyone let GOP/Libertarian philosophy and talking points get a foothold, and that union power has disintegrated. Reagan made union-busting his first priority, and the air traffic controllers were the object lesson; now people think unions can't do shit. Now Dem blame the unions for shit, when really, they should be built back by anyone with a shred of liberal leaning, because that's where liberal power comes from. Liberals pout when their most favored candidate doesn't survive the primaries, and they complain about how The Man is keeping them down.

    Naw, dawg. You're just easily played.

    • Reagan stared the dissolution of union power by firing all the air traffic controllers, an event from which we still haven't recovered from in 2025 since ATCs take a lot of training, so all the ones we have currently are overworked and pulling a lot of overtime along with their short pay, scant benefits and 1980s era equipment.

      Actually, Reagan was the salted bomb that spelled the end of the United States, and it's just been dying of radiation poisoning since. Reagan was a product of television evangelists like Jerry Falwell organizing churches into a Republican voting bloc (with abortion access obstruction being their unifying issue). Why? Because they didn't like nonwhites in their religious academies.

      ...And before that, industrialists who were really sore about FDRs New Deal. (And to make the implication explicit, said industrialists were totally happy with Americans living in shantytowns, Hoovervilles and eating flour paste to survive while dying of malnutrition. This is the great that MAGAs want the US to return to.

      So really, America and the rise of the fascist autocratic MAGA movement is a whole bunch of greed and bigotry all the way down, and if I were reading it in a fiction story, the society deserves to fall. But I'm in the middle of it and it sucks to be the little people while the high lords play their games of thrones.

  • Not saying capitalism is the best form, but which economic form is better given human greed and tendency for corruption?

    • We're not doing capitalism in the US anyway. You can argue it's state capitalism, but personally I don't see it. I'd say we're deep into full on monopolies and oligarchy. If you have enough money and you buy out it otherwise lock out competing business and create vertical integration, the government will subsidize your business, especially your payroll, and if you go bankrupt they will reward you with no taxes for life, or bail out money that you can 90% give yourself personally as a yearly bonus. None of that is capitalism, it doesn't fit that model. We're also letting corporations call themselves individuals with rights, which is absurd, and it's the argument for letting business openly bribe and sponsor politicians, on top of making it also legal to directly pay politicians to vote specific ways, as long as you pay them after the vote happens and not before. None of this fits the capitalist model. Monopolies are supposed to be illegal in capitalist models because it's known to break the model. Regulations are supposed to stop individual businesses from owning their own supply chain, distribution system, raw materials, manufacturing, all in one company. Because, again, it was always known this would break the model. We aren't capitalist. We're in an oligarchy. Might make rights, money is in charge, and there are only rules for the not owner class.

    • The fact people are greedy is not the reason pure socialism/communism fails, there's a multitude of reasons it simply doesn't work well: a lack of market forces upending resource allocation, incentive problems, lack of consumer sovereignty, reduced innovation++

      Best system IMO is a fusion model, publically owned industries where it matters (health, education, PT), and private where it doesn't (goods, foods etc).

  • At this point we need to create a mechanism that allows public pressure on a party.

    Switching from FPTP voting (one-person, one vote) to something else will allow for other parties to have a chance but that will take time to brew.

    We're not ready for sortition (selection of officials by lottery) but that would end the career of politicians. And having barbers and coal miners govern is better than what we got now, even if they'll need a lot of handholding, and an institution to swat away lobbyist pests.

    The voters really did a number breaking open Pandora's jar in November. It's a fine mess they've brought upon us, and one we may not survive to clean up.

414 comments