If you have to pick only one Desktop Environment and use it till your computer breaks, what would you choose?

That's not too hard a question for me, I've been using the same DE for years: KDE
- KDE is one of the main reasons for me to use Linux. I immensely like the performance, silence and battery lifetime of MacBooks. But if I have to work with anything but KDE, it's not worth it for me. The only thing OSX does better than basically any other desktop out there, is the ability to drag whole virtual screen between monitors.
  
  I'm running XFCE (but you could do KDE) on my intel Mac, you can get best of both worlds. I heard silicon is more difficult with Linux tho.
- Has KDE improved since 2010-ish? I gave up KDE because gnome was just a better DE at the time. Gnome sucks now, but I found i3/sway. Haven’t given KDE a second chance yet
  
  Oh yes. Much better since the KDE4 branch / debacle.

KDE

Plasma, been using it since I was a kid
- Plasma's not that old, it just came out a few years ago...
  2008?
  
  K so I just realized they didn't call it plasma until 2008, I first used KDE in 2005.

I'd rather not use a computer at all than use GNOME for the rest of my live.
For me it's KDE Plasma all the way.
- It’s wild to me how GNOME evokes such strong opinions in folks. It really is a love it or hate it kind of deal (I’m in the “love it” camp).
  I wonder why that is. I like KDE ok, but it doesn’t elicit a strong emotion from me. KDE works fine, I just really like GNOME.
  There must be something about GNOME in particular that some people love, and others hate.
  
  For those of us that expect room to breathe and make our machine work for us rather than the other way around, we feel like Gnome takes a lot of liberties away for the sake of "simplicity." There is so much missing from Gnome that is present in most other DEs and even custom WM setups.
  The primary contributors who work under The Gnome Foundation also come off as controlling and arrogant in a lot of cases, and refuse to take community feedback to heart, whereas KDE has literal summits to get user feedback on major core features we want to see which then later get added to their backlogs and sprints as Epics. Gnome acts a lot like Apple in the sense that they're very much "we know what's best for you better than you do."
  Now, the singular area I can give Gnome true props in is their accessibility functionality, but that's primarily it. KDE's accessibility is fairly behind by about a decade in comparison.
  That's just my take, take it as you will.
  
  Honestly, that defaulting to the Search field in the Save dialog when I'm trying to save something just gets me wild. It beggars the imagination why the developers think that's a reasonable thing to do and it colors my whole perception of the DE.
  
  There must be something about GNOME in particular that some people love, and others hate.
  GNOME is heavily opinionated.
  As such it gets praise from people that share that opinion and gets hate from the people that do not. Many other DEs are much more configurable, giving a broader audience the possibility to adjust everything to their liking.
  
  You know how the ending of LOST or Game of Thrones can bring up feelings in people? That's how it was for me when Gnome 3 first came out. I had been using Gnome 2 for a few years and had a good workflow, and then suddenly, everything changed. Back then Gnome 3 was buggy and lacked a lot of things, which didn't help. It also didn't help that the devs took a "the problem is you" stance to all feedback. That said, I use Gnome now, and I like it, it took some years to mature and become good. But the feeling is still there sometimes.
  
  GNOME is a lightly upgraded MacOS interface. Every time I’ve had to use a Mac has pissed me off so GNOME gives me war flashbacks.
  Not necessarily the DE’s fault but ¯(ツ)_/¯
  
  I was team Gnome before Gnome 3 came out. Nowadays I don't mind it for auxiliary computers that I don't interact with regularly. It has a huge community behind it and that is a quality in its own right. But since MATE never really managed to become a worthy successor to Gnome 2 I guess I'm team Plasma now. I got it "forced" on me by my beloved Steam Deck and I can definitely see why Valve went for it.
  Currently I'm experimenting with Hyprland but that is definitely too early to call it my forever pick, so Plasma it is.
  
  Personally, I'm disgusted by the "matter of fact" tone GNOME devs take to criticism only to be wrong in the end.
  It's like, they dig their heels in so deep on dumb shit like "the dock should be on the side because vertical space is at a premium!" and then renege after years of users telling them they're wrong. Literally whoever is floating ideas like that on their team needs to be fired and blacklisted, but unfortunately they're probably promoted.
  They also can't be arsed to include proper settings, so it's up to everyone else to pick up their slack.
  At some point, it starts to feel like weaponized incompetence. I genuinely do not want GNOME's culture to pervade more parts of the free software ecosystem.
- why do you think gnome is the default on everything?
  
  Because distros have a sick sense of humour.

GNOME because it works out of the box like GNOME

KDE. Been upgrading the same environment for 5 years just keeps getting better.
I started around maybe KDE 3?
- Was on KDE 2, KDE 3 was absolutely incredible, ran it on Mac when it was supported on xquartz.
  4 was a mess, but got better, 5 & 6 are fine, but it's overall far better than any other DE, it's just so customizable, the only other thing that comes close is xmonad or something.
  
  Glad KDE has been putting major efforts over recent years into improving stability instead of just adding features.

Desktop environment? Who needs a desktop environment?
- Bro watches videos through ASCII conversion in the cli😭
  
  mpv for the win
  but if you really want your ASCII conversion: mpv --vo=caca or mpv --vo=tct
  
  Bro doesn't need DE to watch videos. Bro doesn't need DE to do anything.
  
  Bad apple in text may be more impressive than it on the Nintendo.
  
  TBH, I've always wanted to do this.

KDE Plasma.
It has been great for gaming, adopting Wayland protocols at a faster rate than other DEs due in part thanks to Valve's contributions.
I freaking love GNOME & Adwaita, but I'll switch back when I deem it better than Plasma.

Definitely Gnome here. Though I have a long list of notes, it mostly just works exactly like I expect with little friction or guessing. I donate $100/year to both Gnome and KDE since they are both good pieces of software, and I love that I get to chose mine. Further, I think KDE is the logical choice for something like the SteamDeck where it's going to have a lot of gamers that expect computers to work like Windows. (even if I don't like it, >_<)

This isn't even hard. KDE without a second thought.
I regularly try other desktops, and I regularly come back to the only desktop with any sort of reasonable thought put into it.

My computer doesn't really break, I'm Ship of Theseus-ing it regularly.
Apart from that, the only one among the normal window based ones that has felt like it respects my will to configure stuff in ways that feel right to me has been KDE Plasma.

XFCE, using it for over 10 years, not planning to change it unless the DE changes radically.

KDE

KDE - I love to tinker and own my DE. 😎

Probably KDE, it's the most 'complete' feeling to me with settings and GUI for most things.
- I would say the same & I don’t even use it—but I would trust it being around the longest & is better than GNOME IMO.

Gnome.

If it has to be a DE then I'd go with XFCE, otherwise I'd probably go with openbox.

I keep coming back to KDE time and time again. It's so easy to mess with, I can set it up exactly how I like it without much effort, and it always looks good because someone else did all the work making themes and widgets I use.
That said, I love XFCE, I'm just trash with CSS so it takes me forever to get it how I like, and on my Surface I can't get the scaling to work so everything is beyond tiny.

KDE for sure. The modern versions look exactly like how I want a desktop environment to look out of the box, and they keep the full range of customizability that a desktop should, IMO, allow it's users to have. Which is something Windows just kept slowly getting rid of over the years.
I also prefer to have a taskbar that is ever present with a traditional start menu that's cleanly organized by category rather than the current full screen pop up "activities" search thing gnome does nowadays.

Cinnamon by and far.
I've used so many distros and DEs I don't even know where to begin, but Cinnamon got me hooked for the long run. It's legitimately the most polished and "ready to run" DE I've ever used, yet still allowing for far more customization than Windows ever offered.
- Cinnamon's been working well for me; I'd choose that, and I don't mind waiting till my laptop breaks to reassess what DE I want!

any computer I need to be stable enough for work/school: KDE
any computer whose primary purpose is for goofing off and gaming: LXQt (and I will spend the entire time configuring LXQt instead of gaming...)
- Why not use steam or arch if it's just fucking around? Arch you can at least configure easily.
  
  tbh hadn't heard of steam and always assumed arch was difficult to learn. but i had been considering trying arch just to see what the hype was about

Gnome for me. I like it

KDE the customization is off the charts

Always wanted to like gnome but never could, and xfce is fine but I much prefer KDE, it is verry likely that I'll actually keep it till my pc breaks.
- That's the beauty of gnome: they don't give a single fuck if you like it. You can return the favor.
  
  Gnome has the apple philosophy that the user conforms to technology, not the other way around.

KDE, always
Used it since I switched to the Linux Desktop 25 years ago. Quickly tried gnome, and others, and hated it.
KDE is fast, efficient, looks awesome, is ready to work with, and highly customizable

I'd say Gnome, since I'm so used to it that I feel it doesn't get in the way of the things I'm doing.
Because that would be my aim: something that doesn't interfere with the work I am doing.

gnome head all the way!!!

KDE Plasma, I can't go back to SDR

KDE plasma. Coming from 30 years of running exclusively windows it's just the most comfortable and easy for me to use (way more than Gnome). Easily configurable, works. Can't ask for more.

I don't mind a little "change" every now and then, but still -- "Sway" on my "potatoes" (Orange pi zero 3 and Orange pi 5 max) and "Hyprland" on my x86_64 PC.
- My daily driver is Arch running sway. Would be hard to go back from the simplicity and elegance.
- Isn’t sway based on i3? i3 is a WM not a DE. But as sway is not X11, I’m not sure if it’s just a WM
  
  Sway still primarily counts as a WM + Compositor, but considering it has keymaps, autostart, and libinput config mechanisms embedded in it, I would say it borders a desktop environment.

Plasma for the last decade. Then probably XFCE, then Cinnamon.
I try Gnome every year or so, but every time I get pissed off with it within a few minutes and wipe it off my machine.

There is nothing better than Xfce, if you dont like the desktop, at least Xfce allows you to customize. KDE seems interesting, but the last time i tried it, 10 years ago more or less, it was a bit buggy.
- You owe KDE a second look if it's been that long.
  
  Agreed. I used to be a diehard XFCE fan and hated KDE.
  Then I saw their resource usage came pretty close to each other but KDE had way more development behind it so they could add Wayland support (which I actually don't even use.)
  KDE used to be buggy and bloated. They've been improving stability for years and their efforts really show. I used to think it was bloated, but it really isn't if you only use the parts you need. I use it pretty similarly to XFCE, it just has more dev support.
- I remember when kde looked like xfce and yeah back then it was buggy. Today it looks like a slightly jank windows 7 but with the giant buttons and curved corners that characterize 2015 software.
  Most of the bugs seem to come from Wayland still being vaguely trashy and kde not having fully migrated from xorg

LXQt or XFCE if I have to pick a DE. Fluxbox or openbox if I can get away with just a WM. ;)

XFCE would be my choice too

Until my laptop dies or cannot support it, I'm sticking with KDE Plasma. Love how MX configured it (because I'm lazy) and absolutely will keep using it for as long as my laptop survived or can hold it.
Might try other ones in VMs (like ratpoison) in the future for other machines I might set up in the future, but for now KDE Plasma is my go-to that I'll probably be using for a long time.

If it has to be a de, I'd pick gnome. Otherwise it's hyprland.

Gnome

KDE.

LXQT. Why? Because: It is lightweight, consumes little resources, is quite customizable, and has full Ukrainian localization.
Maybe I'll switch to XFCE/MATE, but not if there are a lot of things not translated, or if the translation is worse than even Google Translate.

LXQT or KDE I just like the QT look and feel.
GNOME is great in general but not for me, it is too much MacOS alike and too limited for my liking.

The one I'm using right now of course!

KDE plasma, unless it's on a tablet, then Gnome

XFCE. It's lightweight, easy to tweak and looks great. I run it on my 6 y.o. potato laptop
- The surprising thing is that KDE would run on there just fine too. If you don't add all the PIM stuff, it's almost a wash in memory usage and just as snappy.

till
\sigh
- You've obviously felt my pain. Maybe 6th install will take 🤞

Difficult. Paperwm/ Niri has the best workflow.
I am looking forward to set niri as compositor on cosmic.

it's probably gonna be plasma6 by a hair over cinnamon on a rolling distribution. as much as people shit on manjaro here and on that other site, it has never broke on me--whether i update constantly or let it go 2-3 months between them.
but if the de and the underlying os are magically compatible, and those and programs kept up to date, never obsolete, and new ones appear for it as needed or desired... then sorry, it won't be linux... i'm going back to something like 95osr2, 98se or w2k.
- W2k was the best.

I'm a cog in the machine and use KDE, but xfce is awesome, I would use xfce if I couldn't use KDE.

Cinnamon for 2 reasons
KDE is missing a lot of features which still only works in Gnome. Like the taskbar Calendar app syncing events with services like Google Calendar
cinnamon is extremely stable and doesn’t move your icons around when you connect to an external display with your laptop and the display has a different resolution.

KDE Plasma for ease of use if using Nvidia Otherwise Hyprland or exwm

Whatever I can hit the super key and type what program I want. If it can open a browser steam or dark table, the rest doesn't matter much. I was on crunchbang++ then popOS then fedora now I'm on arch with hyprland

MATE has been on most of my machines, except the BSD ones.
But past year or so, I have grown a fondness towards ctwm, and gradually migrated my machines to it, Linux and BSD alike.
It is not a DE, but the fact that I have to assemble my suite of software myself on my machines, makes the point of using DEs moot.

Probably either KDE or NsCDE, I always seem to come back to those

My current desktop is xmonad + xfce in no-desktop mode. Almost no configuration in xmonad, all the stuff like monitor layout and mouse props is handled by xfce. And yes my laptop that I used it on for 6-7 years is now broken (ish) so I've already unlocked this acheivement.
I do feel slightly guilty about not moving to wayland, but I'm not sure how that would improve my experience at all. I did hear xfce is almost there on wayland, so maybe I can move to sway + xfce on wayland at some point.

I've been using spectrwm for over a decade https://github.com/conformal/spectrwm and have no plans to change
- Interesting, do you know i3wm? If so, what is the advantage of spectrwm over it?
  
  I've looked at i3wm, but I never used it, so I don't know. If I had to move to another wm, i3wm seems like the first one that I'd look at, since they seem so similar

i'm already doing this with gnome lol.
if my computer was older, probably xfce.