Reddit starts waking up: Multiple subreddits express concern after Reddit announces they will now begin "warning" users who upvote (not just submit) any "violent" content.
Today we are rolling out a new (sort of) enforcement action across the site. Historically, the only person actioned for posting violating content was the user who posted the content. The Reddit ecosystem relies on engaged users to downvote bad content and report potentially violative content. This not only minimizes the distribution of the bad content, but it also ensures that the bad content is more likely to be removed. On the other hand, upvoting bad or violating content interferes with this system.
So, starting today, users who, within a certain timeframe, upvote several pieces of content banned for violating our policies will begin to receive a warning. We have done this in the past for quarantined communities and found that it did help to reduce exposure to bad content, so we are experimenting with this sitewide. This will begin with users who are upvoting violent content, but we may consider expanding this in the future. In addition, while this is currently “warn only,” we will consider adding additional actions down the road.
We know that the culture of a community is not just what gets posted, but what is engaged with. Voting comes with responsibility. This will have no impact on the vast majority of users as most already downvote or report abusive content. It is everyone’s collective responsibility to ensure that our ecosystem is healthy and that there is no tolerance for abuse on the site.
Some users see this as a reaction to the recent controversy surrounding Luigi Mangione and the fatal shooting of the UnitedHeathCare CEO. There are concerns that this new system (which mods are speculating to be AI-driven) has potential for abuse and censorship, especially given the current vagueness of what is considered a "violent" comment or post.
This is exactly what will happen, given Reddit has developed a recent habit of removing a bunch of things which don't violate rules. The chilling effect isn't a mistake, it's the intent.
and you won't do that regardless. You admins are never careful, and you dont really need to be because all you care about are your corporate overlords, and know that reddit will continue regardless. You've purged so many communities, individuals, etc, to the order of literal thousands and yet reddit still continues. Mods try to blackout in protest and you coup them and reinstall them with people who capitulate to the corporate overlords; and when people try to remove their own content in protest, which should be their own right to do, you reverse the edits. You dont care because you dont have to, there is literally no consequence ever for your actions because you refuse to allow there to be.
Too bad you absolutely failed at this already.
Don’t give us that bullshit. We all know this will go poorly and result in false warnings/bans and the censorship of content that your shareholders dislike.
Allow me to clarify. The same poorly designed and thought out processes that suspend mods who report vote abuse, that suspend mods in modmail for responding to users who post violent content, that remove innocuous content all over the site will now be suspending you for your votes on the site.
The lack of transparency is a feature, not a bug. You will be punished as they see fit, if you like what they don't like. Then there will be feigned surprise when Reddit continues to go downhill.
They keep it vague so they can make it whatever they want it to be at the time. I said I'd stand by and let Elon die if given the chance. Banned.
So does this impact users in r/publicfreakout upvoting a comment that says something like “they deserved that” under a video where someone gets hurt? This really seems like it’ll affect a ton of content in subs like r/instantkarma, or any sub about topics like bad drivers, or any video of someone doing something dangerous or risky, or any comment mentioning Luigi? Punishing people for voting seems like a terrible way to enforce content guidelines. Especially when you don’t want to define the threshold in this post. What percentage of the comments in this post of a nazi getting punched in the face should I not vote on? Anything that supports or justifies him getting punched? Or this post where many or most of the comments are in support of someone fighting back against a bully?
Hi. So, you won't tell people the rules but will warn them about breaking the rules, of which they will have no idea why some upvotes did not break the invisible rules, but others did? I am skeptical that you have thought this through in any way whatsoever. If anything this seems like a tailor-made way to chill content you, Reddit, personally disagree with without having to stand by any stated guidelines by which you do it.
How can one follow the rules without a full understanding of said rules? This is just a blanket cover to allow you folks to silence anyone you choose.
"They may change" yeah, that's not fucking comforting.
So you're creating a rule but won't actually explain how the rule works so that people can at least try to properly follow the rule, all because you don't want people to "game it?" Dude, come on. That's stupid as all fuck.
Thanks u / worstnerd for being the admin that gets me to leave Reddit.
Upvoting/downvoting history is a goldmine in terms of both marketing and surveillance.
Every user with over a year of organic activity is a goldmine. Maybe you've never ever posted a single controversial opinion online. But you might have upvoted someone else's - BAM, on a list. Or rather, category I assume. Those innocuous clicks reveal a lot more about you than you think. That information WILL be used against you. If you're lucky, only to try and sell you shit you don't need. If unlucky...
Yeah, to think that the CIA or other gov agencies don't have all this info would be naive. Snowden showed us some of the extent of private info gathering.
It's not certain, and there's also the work and energy to analyze this huge amount of data, but we should cautiously assume they have everything.
And with advancements in AI it will become increasingly easier to parse the data.
Can’t Lemmy instances access this data as well for upvotes/downvotes? Instsnces dint display it by default, but couldn’t a government actor set up an instance and then collect all of this data?
I'm not worried about someone showing up at my door over upvoting posts on the internet. We all just need to decide that if they start doing that we shoot them in the face on the porch. Sooner or later guys will stop showing up. There's way more of us than there are of them and that's the realization they want to suppress more than anything. Don't let the ones who really should be afraid make you afraid.
Thats why I'm so pissed that fb locked me out of my account. I wanted it gone but was floundering for family. I'm a little pissed they have my new email tbh
Luigi represents the biggest possible threat to the established order. You can win a war, crush a revolution, and even enslave a people, but it doesn't change the basic math:
A lone gunman can be just as powerful as any CEO, politician, or king in the right moment.
That's the real message that they're trying to suppress, because they know he's going to have copycats as they tighten the noose on the working class.
There were comments jokingly considering that Digg is trying to come back. And I'm bummed nobody mentioned Lemmy. (And I don't have a Reddit anymore after leaving)
People are recommending Lemmy. It's how I found this site literally today. It may not be a massive flood of accounts, but this was the straw that broke the camel's back for some of us.
A bunch of politicians are in the Kremlin and Stalin is giving a speech outlining some new policy. One politician stands up and angrily yells out- "Stalin! This is wrong! I cannot support this measure". Everyone gasps and looks at him.
Quickly, another politician stands up and replies "Comrade! Don't you know? You cannot say that Stalin is incorrect! We do not do that here."
Stalin ignores these outbursts, tells everyone to settle down and continues the speech.
Of course, this being Stalinist Russia, the man who disagreed with Stalin gets quietly sent to the gulag for a couple of years to learn his lesson.
The second man, however, gets sent to the gulag for 20 years and doesn't come out until he is an old man.
What's the moral of the story? Implicit censorship is so much more powerful than explicit censorship. This is reddit goal. Create an air where people self-regulate their speech. The key is not to say it out loud. It needs to be vague and amorphous and ambiguous.
This reminds me of a story told to me by the Ukrainian Master Accordionist Leonid Nosov twenty five years ago when he was my landlord.
Leonid had grown up under the communist regime:
"They would come every month, the party bosses. And they would tell us to do this and not to do that and we would listen very closely but never ask questions. Just nod. Just smile. Thank the boss. Then go back to doing what needed doing. If you don't understand this, then everyone in town would yell at you when the bosses were gone. Because if you don't stay quiet, then they take you away, and then maybe you tell the bosses what everyone is really doing."
I've found that this to be good advice in most corporate settings as well.
This is exactly how my last job was... We'd just smile and nod while boss talked about unhinged solutions to problems that didn't exist. We'd then spend the next week or so subtly trying to extract the perceived problem and intent of the request, find a proper solution, and never tell him what we were actually doing just that the thing he wanted is getting resolved. It all had to be very hush hush to prevent him from stepping in and fucking it all up
I think a lot of people should pay attention and get ready to live like the Slavs did under the Soviets. We might be heading towards a similar period in the US, I think.
It's so tiresome to read people regurgitating 50s era John Bircher agitprop that was churned out by the same folks lynching Emitt Till and Michael Donald.
One of my favorite old "Soviet" jokes is about a CIA agent and a KGB agent sharing a drink at a bar in Berlin.
The CIA agent says "We Americans are always so impressed with Soviet propaganda. You can get so many people from so many countries and in so many languages to believe the exact same things. Incredible."
The KGB smiles and drinks, then responds "Thank you. But the things you get people to believe are truly incredible. We can't hold a candle to the America propagandists."
The CIA agent sputters in indignantion before relying "Nonsense! Americans don't use propaganda!"
I recently wandered back after being on Lemmy for like a year and a half, and I was really surprised at just how much of the more recent posts were just botshit. I never seriously believed we'd see the dead internet, but contemporary Reddit is really mostly bots talking to LLMs talking to bots with a few users mixed in.
the reddit ecosystem relies on engaged users to downvote bad content…
Sounds like the engaged users have decided what the good content is, but it doesn’t align with the opinions of the tech CEO whose dick is tickling the admins tonsils.
Keep going reddit. I’m sure one more form of censorship will make daddy musk love you again.
I'm a regular Lemmy hater. And I'll happily list off all the obvious habits (and even entire communities) that Lemmy has inherited from the R-word site.
But I'll say this much in Lemmy's favor. It's not Voat. It's not 8chan. It's not Rumble.
The liberals and leftists that decamped Spez's Omalas for something better do seem genuinely interested in pursuing it. They're not turning this iteration of social media into some cesspool of scams, snuff films, and child porn.
You'd think that would be an easy bar to clear, but this community has done it while so many others haven't.
I am very happy with my time on Lemmy. A couple weird people to avoid, just like normal life. Feels like a free place to express yourself, but not be an asshole. That's all I want from my internet.
Glad I got my ass permabanned for making a user name aita_mods_are_all_incels to avoid (what I felt was a BS) temp ban.
I was wrong to act like a child but glad to be gone and on Lemmy where folks are less touchy...unless I fuck up and post in an incorrect community...like something supporting cars in c/fuckcars...I need to read the room
Lmao I'm perma banned from Reddit because I got banned from /r/conservative too many times. Several of those bans were just very basic comments regarding the truth.
Same here. Though my permanent ban came from telling a mod at r/conservative to enjoy getting penetrated in his gaping asshole by Donald Drumpf. I don’t think he liked that one
This shit is exactly what we knew was coming at some point. TPTB see that we all love Luigi and are quite happy to see more CEOs killed. They can't allow us it to happen again
This really fucking pisses me off because there are a ton of marginalized people who take shit online all the time and these social media services all act like their hands are tied and there's nothing they can do. But this makes it blatantly obvious that they can take action when they want to.
When I did that last year before their API change, they restored all of my comments, but just didn't put them back in the comments section of my profile. I only knew when I ran across a comment with my previous reddit handle by accident, one that had been deleted. They know what users are trying to do, so won't let it get in the way of profits.
When posting direct quotes from the Declaration of Independence is interpreted as a call to violence on an American platform, there is a problem. The founding fathers of our nation were not perfect but they understood humanity's willingness to suffer oppressive rule and the necessity of fighting against it within our own borders.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
If you dare speak on how the Tree of Liberty needs watering with the blood of patriots and tyrants, you get auto-banned. Reddit has been a fascist in sheep's skin for at least a decade.
How many time does Reddit need “wake up”? It’s a fucking trash community with the same five news articles getting reposted per day. The stories are so obviously “AI” that anyone reading and believing them has clearly lost their last ability for critical thinking. It’s a shell of its former self. We’re in the end stage of the internet that many of us grew up with.
This comment brings up another important point: by reddit's own "reddiquette", upvotes and downvotes are not meant to be used as a sign of support. Everyone knows that they are, but officially they are meant to simply be used as "this contibutes to the conversation".
So there's hypocrisy right at the base concept this whole plan is built off of. Not surprising.
So you’re creating a rule but won’t actually explain how the rule works so that people can at least try to properly follow the rule, all because you don’t want people to “game it?” Dude, come on. That’s stupid as all fuck.
Every fucking time I see admins/mods say this as to why they cann't clearly articulate rukes it drives me crazy. Just give the rule and explain the intent because what is seen as gaming the rules is just the times people were close to violating it.
I found out that referring to a top 10 breakdown of healthcare CEOs as "Luigi's List" is inciting violence under the new rules. That comment had 500+ upvotes before it was removed.
So, to all the poor bastards who upvoted me and are now on Reddit's hit list... I'm sorry, folks. No one told me they were rigging my shitposts with landmines.
I promoted Lemmy several times on Reddit and didn't have any problems. I don't really give a fuck if they ban that worthless account so I will continue to do so.
Either they need it linked to your real ID or you can't post.
I see a lot of wild shit being said there. Make no mistake they know who these people are. They also allow a lot of threat actor behavior on the platform which leads to the conclusion that they approve their shill ops
They had the power to stop this back when Reddit made their API changes. It would've required mods to make a principled stand and suffer the consequences for it...but not nearly enough of them did.
At least 2 popular subreddits I know of are controlled by Russian trolls spreading misinformation, I'm sure there are more. They've even offered to pay off subreddit owners/mods in order to get control.
If you have any issue with mods, admins are not interested. I haven't used reddit for years due to these things. If the mods are no good for any reason, there's no recourse.
I was thinking... I know there's a script that can overwrite all your past posts, usually as a privacy thing or just a "fuck you" wipe to reddit for monitizing your years of input...
I didn't do that when I left during the non-sence almost 2 years ago because I felt bad destroying that knowledge I left, but sometimes that's how things have to be...
Wouldn't it be nice to wipe your entire 9 years of reddit posts with something fairly mundane but that would hit the threshold for this bullshit new rule?
It is wild how quickly the US is trying to erase any references to how it was formed or how it has conducted itself since it's land mass was found by Europe almost 600 years ago