A foreign sieg heiling, self described drug addict, absent father, hostile nation to the US favoring, non elected billionaire is making these threats. And apparently that's all good with the right. Let's just imagine Harris and Soros pulling this. What would be the outcry?
That's the most frustrating part to me. They tell you what they're going to do by projecting it on Democrats, then when you try to have a conversation with someone who watches mainstream media it's near impossible to find common ground
Sorry officer, I've never seen this person in my life...
...and even if I did, I'm sure they didn't do it, and if they did do it, I'm sure it was self defense, and if it wasn't, well it must have been that the other guy really deserved it.
I'm curious what the consequences of that were to be. There are more oligarchs operating here than just Musk. His death might trigger something, but killing a whole gang of operatives discreetly would be quite the challenge.
I mean, it's open to interpretation, but the reason I said that is because the author uncritically accepts a lot of Musk's and Trump's premises which legitimizes Musk's actions, while consistently avoiding any clear criticism.
E.g.:
Musk, the self-appointed Trumpian king of government efficiency, is also not only taking a hardline approach to trimming the federal bureaucracy.
Frames that Musk actually is seeking to "trim the federal bureaucracy" in the author's voice.
Of course, this all aligns perfectly with President Trump’s broader goal of cutting government spending, with Trump even suggesting that Musk should get more aggressive. That’s right — Musk’s plan to weed out slackers thus far somehow hasn’t been “extremely hardcore” enough for the president. So, in classic Musk fashion, he’s gone all-in, demanding rigorous reporting, cutting contracts, and looking to save a cool $1 trillion along the way.
Bold mine. This paragraph together has a lot of tells. The phrase "weed out slackers" implies there are real "slackers" that Musk is fairly "weeding out."
Musk's "demanding rigorous reporting" also legitimizes and normalizes Musk's harassment of these employees. The author's use of "classic Musk fashion" with this legitimized language implies the author also has a positive opinion of Musk.
"Looking to save a cool $1 trillion" is breezy casual language that could be argued to restate Musk's goal, but use of "save" is a positive connotation word, and subtly implies waste. "A cool" before money is meant to make the number more impressive.
Meanwhile, over at DOGE (the acronym for the Department of Government Efficiency), employees are reportedly working 120-hour weeks and sleeping in pods to keep up with the billionaire’s demands. Will this lead to a leaner, meaner federal workforce, or just mass resignations and bureaucratic chaos? Either way, I think we all know how Musk would answer his own What would you say you do here? question: He led the DOGE team in hacking through the federal government like a caffeine-fueled lumberjack at a piñata party.
The closing paragraph is meant to look neutral but again, this seems to lionize DOGE by making them look like hard workers (no need to verify or be skeptical of the 120 hour claim?), and frame it as Musk having a killer response to the Office Space question.
Read the article through the lens of a MAGA and maybe that will convey it better - this seems like hype, loosely coded for mainstream.
here's a secret, the insanity is the whole point. it's a beserker, reset, on a federal level, break, burn, and wreck everything they can lay their hands on, make it unusable unworkable and irretrievably broken. that's elon musks's job, that's trump's entire cabinet's job. that's it.
I don't think anyone really doubts that. entire 4000+ word think pieces decrying why "move fast, break things" doesn't work in govt are being written alongside hours+ long YouTube essays describing project 2025 goals to dismantle the state. you're not sharing a secret, you're describing what we see with our own eyes... well, I guess maybe apolitical brainwashed normies aren't aware.
but breaking shit isn't the actual GOAL, imo, at least not the whole goal. it's a methodology, a strategy perfected in silicon valley boardrooms unleashed into the realm of politics. it will merely pave the way for other goals down the road.
heritage foundation freaks might be content with dissolving government, but Thiel and Musk and others like them have much longer term plans than that.
we need to focus on that while yes, simultaneously spreading the truth of what's happening to the normies.
It’s not like they are going to read it. They just learned from the last round of mass-firings that they will get sued if they lie about firing people for performance reasons. Now they will have plausible deniability when lying about firing people for performance reasons.
that he's a foreign-born citizen matters so much less than he's an incompetent ketamine addicted billionaire narcissist. but I get it, something something right wing hypocrisy.