data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3f60/c3f609c974a431b5d31f0a6b1c97d9a151f7bfc1" alt="CapriciousDay"
Software developer, intermittent indie game dev, formerly u/captainbland on reddit. Also kind of interested in medical imaging etc.
What dem supporters need to understand is that support for Trump for many is people sticking two fingers up at the neoliberal order. All this talk of "woke" or whatever would all evaporate if people thought they were getting a fair shake. Of course it's a bloody stupid way of protesting this like so as it's basically asking the foxes to fix the hen house.
The key point is the neoliberal order hasn't been successful by capitalist standards. GDP growth in western countries from 1985-2015 was slower than the 1955-1984 period which preceded neoliberal policies taking hold.
So what you ended up with was a system which actually slowed growth, removed welfare in a lot of cases, made housing unaffordable and really only seems to have succeeded in funnelling money into the hands of the 0.1%.
People have been convinced all kinds of scapegoats and whatever are to blame, but it's pretty clear that they see mainstream politicians, as most embodied by the Dems, as the face of their issues.
The lack of self-reflection on the part of mainstream Dems is a huge, serious issue which has basically given Trump and Musk a blank cheque to implement fascism or at least very authoritarian capitalism.
if there's any medical conspiracy going on, it's that the effort to destroy trust in the medical establishment is a ploy to promote eugenics and survival of the fittest by modern day Nazis.
Imagine doing this during a massive bird flu outbreak, in a country that was essentially founded on biological weapons based genocide.
Any time there's a ready meal from the supermarket and for some reason the adhesive is way stronger than the plastic film. You end up with loads of bits of film just sort of stuck to the rim of it. Super annoying.
Republican Senator Lindsey Graham suggested at the Munich Security Conference over the weekend that Trump’s demand was a clever ploy to bolster declining popular support for the Ukrainian cause. “He can go to the American people and say, ‘Ukraine is not a burden, it is a benefit,’” he said.
I continue to be amazed by how frequently the entire spectrum from mainstream liberal regular conservative to Trumpist conservative fascist fall back on a line which is tantamount to "they're not tricking you, they're tricking someone else! Totally trustworthy!"
We're just smelly sacks of biology like a rat or a lizard who happen to have developed higher reasoning capacity for whatever reason.
not only do these people want to do fascism, they want you to rawdog it
Edit: having read this back to myself, I realise that the alternative of non-rawdogged fascism would be much more unlikely
As an exercise, try to be conscious about your thought process, write stuff down. When your thought process leads to an action with a consequence or verifiable prediction, consider: did it pan out? Was that because of your thought process or a fluke? If something went wrong then what about your thought process didn't help you?
This can help you to narrow down stuff like: did a possibility not arise to you, were you biased/overly dogmatic in some way, did you just not know some relevant information or a particular technique that could have helped you? Have you gotten out of practice with something? Was the situation even in your control?
And like wise if it's good, what can you repeat? Did you apply some good critical thinking rule or something you learned? Are there situations where this wouldn't have happened this way?
I find it's impractical to do this for everything but worthwhile doing every so often and sometimes this can call out patterns in your cognitive processes.
Another one on mental clarity: do the apple test. Try to visualise an apple. At some point I struggled with this and got mediocre results but I was able to improve it by doing some visualisation based "meditation"/exercises and employing some techniques like verbally saying or thinking the word "apple" or a description of one and/or focusing on parts of it before attempting to call the whole apple into view. This had some carry over benefits like being able to visualise things in blender in my head better.
It's still March... 2020
Too real. Not just holidays, weeks and months go by and it's like "shit when did it get to 2025??"
I no longer feel a sense of unrealised potential for myself I guess. That's it, I've got what I've got.
This from the same people who told you to inject disinfectant and are actively distancing themselves from international medical consensus.
Bill Burr's project to turn every mansion into Luigi's Mansion
Without knowing the finer details, my assumption would be that it's some kind of risk/reward tradeoff.
Ok the nuclear risk is higher, but causing chaos in nuclear security could create opportunities like giving Trump or Musk more direct access to the nukes or removing people who might have prevented them from using them, thereby granting them more personal leverage. This would be in keeping with the Project 2025 aligned executive orders and such.
There might even be commercial opportunities for Musk: "oh well the state management of nuclear security was super inefficient, ApocalypseX will do it"
Remember disaster capitalism is a thing.
I think Hanlon's razor is a false dichotomy here. Neither stupidity nor malice are required to explain self-interest, which is the far more likely explanation given the people involved and their actions up to this point.
If going from scratch, trying to get support from an acquiring bank to verify authorisation and settlement integration as a community project would be "interesting". Things like PCI compliance, 3DS accreditation etc. also. Pretty much need to piggyback off an existing solution.
Yeah definitely. I'm sure some people in co-tech in the UK were working on something like this in a more generalised way a while back. They were running sessions for people on this for a while. Working with experienced orgs on this would be key.
Ideally each country would have a system which generates all the basic legal paperwork and a sound (if basic and intended for extension) constitution which encodes essential compliance requirements. Getting such a system verified may be easier said than done, however, especially depending on how co-op friendly the local regulatory environment happens to be.
I'd say if anything it's hard to stop people from doing so. It'd be trivial to set up an ad-hoc exchange (e.g. I'll PayPal you money for tokens) for instance or simply resell items purchased with the tokens in a fiat market.
Thinking more strategically, I think the aim would ultimately to get things like this provided through our co-opy marketplace.
The question then becomes when does exchange into national fiat currencies become an issue: legally of course there's money laundering concerns. I'm hoping that the continual regular and cheap issuing of the tokens would generate a somewhat inflationary environment (which is compensated merely through dealing with everything instantly and electronically with an exchange mechanism) which would head off speculation at least.
Then maybe there is some idea that there should be an exchange to fiat currencies which is also organised as a co-op, which could allow some governance to be put in place around it and then defederate from instances which allow ad-hoc fiat exchange (again to put in a speed bump for money laundering and criminal liability).
Honestly just proprietary driver, steam and proton works really well for me on stock Fedora workstation.
Ok here's the pitch: instances generate currency for each of their users on a time registered basis or some other easily verifiable metric. Each instance's currency is different and they automatically generate exchange rates with each other instance's currency. People buy and sell items through it using only currencies generated by the federated platform.
Also all instances have to be co-ops or they get de-federated. Maybe the license even specifies this.
????
Socialism
Paradox of tolerance license
Or maybe a catchier name would be a "basic human decency GPL extension"
I can't help but notice that organisations constantly co-opt free software which was developed with the intent to promote freedom, use it to spread hate and ideas which will ultimately infringe on freedom for many.
The fact that hateful people who use such software may then go on to use it to promote or otherwise support fascism which prevents others from enjoying the software in the way it was imagined, is one potential manifestation of the paradox of tolerance in this respect. I think this is particularly true for e.g. social media platforms and the fediverse.
My proposal to combat this would be the introduction of a "paradox of tolerance" license which says that organisations which use the software must enforce a bare-minimum set of rules to combat intolerance. So anti-racism, anti-homophobia, anti-transphobia, etc. The idea is then to make overtly hateful organisations legally liable for the use of the software through the incompatibility of the requirements with their hateful belief system.
This could be an extension to GPL and AGPL where the license must be replicated in modified versions of the software, thereby creating virality with these rules.
Is this a thing already? I understand OS and FOSS have historically had a thing for political neutrality but are we not starting to find the faults with this now?
The British government has secretly demanded that Apple give it blanket access to all encrypted user content uploaded to the cloud, reports The...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e52e/4e52ec2af5aa26e39c8e323a7a52265a049ecb1d" alt="Apple Ordered by UK to Create Global iCloud Encryption Backdoor"
iCloud backdoor mandated by the UK. We have to ask the question: if MI5 has access to this today, won't Reform have access to it tomorrow?
We even have Elon Musk trying to get to Reform aligned with Stephen Yaxley-Lennon (aka Tommy Robinson), an already far-right party currently polling very well.
We have to act as though an overtly far-right government is coming to the UK some time before 2030 and if that's the case: our government and judiciary need to stop laying the groundwork for them today.