Skip Navigation
23 comments
  • True, true. A lot of them, maybe most of them, are trolls. I know their schedule.

    • If they are, and if their goal is to keep us angry, then:

      • Bad news: They're succeeding
      • Good News: I'm angry at them rather than whatever they're aiming for.

      I also feel there's an equal chance they're just perpetually online buzzkills / Debbie Downers.

      • Again, I know their schedule. Here are their priorities right now that's probably pretty to close to the correct order:

        • Promote anything kirk that they can to keep that the conversation and not the nazi shit the admin is doing or the epstein connections for trump
        • Serial downvote anyone, posts or comments, they think isn't promoting what they want.
        • "Discuss" things in huge diatribes that really don't say anything and look like AI wrote, to hide genuine people's opinions.
        • Try and get anything positive or fun downvoted by themselves, brigading or convince others to for "reasons."
        • Cause a general vibe of anger on the front page.
  • I think of good news during times like these like I'd think of finding $10 on the ground while watching my house burn down. We're losing so, so much more than we're gaining day after day. Sure, take some time to rest when you need it, but never take your eyes off the prize - we need to start truly preparing to physically fight back against the rise of fascism around the world, and we need to do it yesterday. Allow yourself a minute or two to be happy about good news if it helps, but don't let it distract you.

  • It's a balance. Someone brought up the pacific garbage patch. Nitpicking about the existence of the other garbage patches does not detract from the fact that one is being cleaned. Hurrah. However, if the clean up efforts were simultaneously releasing sea-life killing chemicals into the water, then yes that might be something worth bringing up. Understanding what is actually context for any given issue is great. Fluff news in the vein of !orphancrushing@lemmy.world are deservedly picked on. Legitimately good news don't need the have shadows cast on them from issues that aren't relevant. And even if something is somewhat relevant (like the existence of other garbage patches) one can frame it in a way that isn't shitting on the first bit of good news. Like "oh, great, I'm glad to hear this garbage patch is getting cleaned, hope this success inspires efforts to clean up the others too" as opposed to "who cares, there's more".

    There are these bell curve people who have surface scratch information about a million things because they spend so much time online, yet they lack the wisdom to know how and when to connect bits of information together.

23 comments