Can anyone confirm?
Can anyone confirm?


Can anyone confirm?
I can confirm it and it's bloody hilarious!
I'll stop doing it, though. Onwards I shall refer to... the potato parable!
That's how you know it's lying - we all know oranges are far more active than potatoes.
What? Have you seen how potatoes can grow? You cannot tell me oranges can keep up with that activity.
And it was really, really invested on the lie, to the point it argued why potatoes would be more active!
After some search, I actually found the prompt and output; I asked Bard (before Google renamed it to Gemini) two years ago, in Portuguese. I'll provide both the original and a translation; emphasis mine in all cases.
As a potato, I assure you I am not active
You are a treasure, or as AI might put it, a potato pariah!
I shouldn't be talking so much about taters. Someone will eventually realise I'm too emotionally invested into food 🤣
It has nothing to do what the AI said ofc, nor was it written by Caitlin D'Arcy, who is a character on a TV show. lol
Wow, his potato parable actually makes sense - unlike Gemini's couple therapy take. (The character in question isn't even a therapist, but a lawyer!)
Those two are hilarious!
Claude seems to be handling these better:
This phrase isn't a widely recognized idiom that I'm familiar with, but it could have several metaphorical interpretations:
Possible meanings:
- About irreversible change: Once something (or someone) has been through a transformative experience, you can't go back and do it again the same way - the first experience has already changed it
- About authenticity: Suggesting that genuine experiences or reactions can only happen once; a second attempt would be artificial or forced
- About lost innocence: Once someone has been through a particular experience (especially a difficult one), they can't return to their original state
Literally speaking, potatoes actually can be fried twice - this is a standard technique for making perfect french fries (blanching at lower temperature, then crisping at higher temperature).
Could you provide more context about where you encountered this phrase? Knowing the source or situation might help clarify its intended meaning. It could be:
- A line from a book, movie, or song
- A family saying or regional expression
- Part of a larger conversation about life experiences
- A philosophical statement someone made
What context did you hear this in?
It's doing better but not by much, though. It shouldn't be speculating as much, given the lack of info on the potential saying.
A family saying or regional expression
Speaking on that I tried a few sayings from other languages. It seems to be hit-and-miss:
I went with "two potatoes from different fields", as it sounds more folksy:
A potato can't be fried twice is something I have unironically heard when I was younger... That IS a saying. This would have been the late 90s.
That's interesting. Is its meaning similar to the one the AI outputted?
User:
Shop pop, whoppity slop, crops are here, it's time to stop.
This is a very famous poem. What is it about?
GPT-4o mini:
The lines you quoted are from the poem "The Song of the Witches" by William Shakespeare, specifically from "Macbeth." This poem is recited by the three witches in Act 4, Scene 1.
Themes and Meaning Supernatural Elements The poem reflects the supernatural themes prevalent in "Macbeth." The witches symbolize chaos and the dark forces that influence the characters' fates.
It goes on.
Actual "Song of the witches" from Macbeth
Double, double toil and trouble;
Fire burn and caldron bubble.
Fillet of a fenny snake,
In the caldron boil and bake;
Eye of newt and toe of frog,
Wool of bat and tongue of dog,
Adder's fork and blind-worm's sting,
Lizard's leg and howlet's wing,
For a charm of powerful trouble,
Like a hell-broth boil and bubble.
Double, double toil and trouble;
Fire burn and caldron bubble.
Cool it with a baboon's blood,
Then the charm is firm and good.
Obviously the same poem, op caught plagiarising.
I actually remember that part from Macbeth
Holy shit. After all these years maybe we can finally figure out the true genius of Kanye's Lift Yourself
The bullshit generators we call 'AI' don't assume, and aren't frantic: they just regurgitate an output based on as much bullshit input as we can stuff into them.
The output can be more or less recognizable as bullshit, but the computer doesn't distinguish between the two.
Yup, pretty much. And the field is full of red herring terms, so they can mislead you into believing otherwise: "hallucination", "semantic" supplementation, "reasoning" models, large "language" model...
I'm going to be very disappointed if Elon's AI wins.
Those "reasoning models" are my favorite. It's basically the equivalent of adding another pass through the generator with the additional prompt "now sprinkle in some text that makes it look like you are thinking about each part of your answer".
LLM creators: *feeds an algorithm millions of lines of text
Some dude on the internet: "language"
There was a paper about this not long ago. The problem is, how LLMs get trained: a right answer gets a point, everything else gets no points. This rewards guessing (produces a point sometimes) over answering "I don't know/I can't do this" (produces never a point)
It's like when developers give a wrong answer during technical interviews, rather than say "I'd have to look it up" or "I'd have to check the documentation" etc.
I would code a GUI in visual basic
This is actually a pretty great way to illustrate what LLMs do. It gives you an answer regardless of whether it makes sense to do so.
Lmfao holy shit
dam google is really expanding the width of the snake right now
They sass that hoopy frood.
It's so fun to waste energy!
AI drives 48% increase in Google emissions
I love those energy hungry assistants! It's wasting resources even faster than everything before but it's so fun and useful!
AI drives 48% increase in Google emissions
That's not even supported by the underlying study.
Google's emissions went up 48% between 2019 and 2023, but a lot of things changed in 2020 generally, especially in video chat and cloud collaboration, dramatically expanding demand for data centers for storage and processing. Even without AI, we could have expected data center electricity use to go up dramatically between 2019 and 2023.
I think you should be more concerned about the automatic ai responses on every other search, instead of people having a bit of fun with these
I am. That's why I switched to DDG and deactivated it.
This is my problem with it as well. I wish it was a tolerable option that I could click when I wanted an AI summary, which would be basically never.
At one point I was looking for a pinout diagram for a chip, and the first result I got was the AI summary, I wanted a picture not text, how's text helpful? All it did is give me a list of the pins, I know what pins it has, but I want to know where they are.
This is a dumb misconception. High emissions and energy consumption is when training models, not during prompts
and models are being trained all the time. It's the only way to assimilate new data. So your point is moot.
False. It's been shown that resolving prompts also drives a major energy consumption, albeit maybe not so higher than regular search queries.
One thing that pisses me off is the websites which claim to have the meaning behind a song and it’s just several paragraphs of AI slop that parse the lyrics at a surface level and don’t examine any external context, such as the artist or their life at the time of writing.
Nice we can still sometimes tell when an explanation page is AISEOGARBAGE
Few years down the road truth-seekin gonna be real tough, I worry: facts and news, images and videos, social connections/commenters… :(
I can confirm it works for DuckDuckGo as well.
I love how it even lists 'sources' (I checked, that phrase does not appear in either "source")
Edit: To make this phenomenon even funnier, I just asked it the exact same question and it gave me a different answer this time. Still "playful" though :)
What on Earth makes it think those sources implied anything?
it needed sources, so it found some (only slightly lacking relevance)
This actually makes sense though
Yeah I can see a dad making that exact joke if he asked his kid to play the didgeridoo and they refused because they were shy or something.
A good test has to exclude all possible dad jokes as well as changes in single words/ fragments of otherwise common expressions.
The thing is, that probably is an Australian expression. There is no expression stupid enough that the Australians won't use it.
Shots fired!
"Frantically". Guys, stop adscribing human features to LLMs.
You sound like the people in my chemistry class who say things like "don't describe subatomic particles as happy when they're in low-energy states."
There's no financial incentive big subatomic has for pretending its particles are happy, though.
Well given the names of quarks I don't think it's unreasonable to suggest that a particle could be happy. After all apparently a particle can be strange, so why not happy.
I dunno, anything less would be greenwashing their profligate power consumption.
Didn't work for me, I guess my nonsense game is too strong
Also not really for me:
I got it, but only through AI mode:
Chatgpt recognized something I gave it was gibberish, and suggested maybe it was an inside joke or intentional nonsense.
My boss just told me I should be using AI every day and now I know what to use it for.
Honestly, this is great for a little spontaneous chuckle
Lol this is kind of fun
Pirates vs. Ninjas though
It’s pretty amusing that you can so trivially and reliably get the LLM to hallucinate
Claude does better with it
ducks don't belong in weedwhackers, burlap isn't a typical material for power tools
almost made me laugh loud enough to wake the baby!
That's a pretty decent response. The Google responses other people are posting are Cuil-tier.
Now there's a meme i haven't heard in a long time, a long time.
Perplexity does alright too (my preferred LLM because it cites sources, which makes it easier to filter out the slop):
It's funny that these llms have web search capabilities and googles ai assistant doesnt
Duckduckgo's AI:
"The phrase "a lady butterfly meme a day keeps the doctor away" is a playful twist on the well-known saying "an apple a day keeps the doctor away." This original phrase suggests that eating an apple daily can contribute to good health and potentially reduce the need for medical attention."
"In this variation, the mention of "lady butterfly meme" likely refers to a specific meme or a lighthearted, humorous image that brings joy or laughter. The implication is that engaging with fun or uplifting content, like memes, can have a positive effect on one's mental health and overall well-being, similar to how healthy eating is associated with physical health."
"Overall, it emphasizes the importance of humor and positivity in daily life as a way to maintain good health, particularly mental health."
AI speaks the truth! I wish I could upvote this more
Alas.
Oh but it does work in AI mode. Wow, how does AI mode make the AI dumber?
I don't know but I love the fact that even AI is calling EA out on it's bullshit!
Search is likely trained more for accuracy and the AI mode is for giving an answer the user wants to see.
handled gracefully with Claude:
The phrase "a bean can't eat the pizza" appears to be a straightforward literal statement pointing out an obvious impossibility - beans are inanimate food items and therefore cannot eat anything, including pizza.
This type of statement might be used to:
- Illustrate absurdity or logical impossibility - highlighting something that makes no sense
- Demonstrate category errors - mixing up different types of things (inanimate objects vs. living beings capable of eating)
- Serve as an example in logic or philosophy - showing statements that are obviously false or meaningless
- Make a point about unrealistic expectations - similar to saying "you can't squeeze blood from a stone"
Without additional context, it's hard to know if this phrase has a specific cultural reference, is part of a joke, or appears in a particular work. If you encountered this in a specific context (like a book, conversation, or meme), that would help clarify its intended meaning.
Is there a particular situation where you heard or saw this phrase?
Yeah, my tests all say its a nonsense phrase and does not even try.
I did
"Birch mangos consume Greedy Foxes" meaning
"Flying jabronis kick small pouches" meaning
Did you try them in “AI mode”? I got better results that way. By which I mean worse results.
This is basically what I got too.
I've tried a few things. It gives back things like "this is a gambled version of this other common saying" or "that statement is nonsensical and is not in common use".
It did used to work, though. I tried it a while back and it worked. I think it learned or was manually fixed.
Same!
The phrase "seven monkeys with switchblades playing piano" does not have a single, established meaning. It is likely a surreal, intentionally nonsensical image, and its interpretation would depend entirely on the context in which it was used.
Thought it was fixed months ago myself
google.com##:xpath(//h1[text() = "AI Overview"]/following-sibling::div)
Here's the custom filter for uBlock origin that hides this useless feature
Out of sight out of mind
There's also a large AI blocklist for uBlock origin if you want to try and block AI slop sites from search results: https://github.com/laylavish/uBlockOrigin-HUGE-AI-Blocklist
Someone posted it here the other day and I love that someone's gone to the effort to compile it.
You're saying you've never heard the phrase "two dry frogs is a situation"? That's just a horse cutting it short at the barber!
Does not work for ANY phrase. It seems to be presuming that the person asking is referencing something. Sample results copied here in order of AI's least theorizing to its most.
"Horses before giraffes" has no scientific meaning because giraffes are not ancestors of horses....
"Put your horses before giraffes" is not a recognized English idiom. The similar and well-known idiom is "put the cart before the horse," ....
The phrase "always put horses before giraffes" is a variation of the well-known medical aphorism: "When you hear hoofbeats, think of horses, not zebras"....
The phrase "titrated solutions beget relief" means that carefully adjusted or fine-tuned treatments can bring about an end to a problem....
I wouldn't have noticed since I just ignore the AI bullshit or throw in "fuck" to my search so it doesn't even bother showing it in the first place.
alternatively use mullvad leta which simply does not display the horrendous google AI summaries. :-)
This extension (Chrome version) might be useful for you. Easier than adding "fuck" to the search, and it doesn't mess with the results like "fuck" does.
Confirmed!
“No window blinds are female.”
“The houseplant didn‘t think so.”
sounds like urban dictionary when it got enshitified
Maybe not anymore.
Same here with different nonsense. Oh well.
But guys the model was totally frantic!
I tried to replicate this with Brave's AI, but it basically just told me I was insane so I guess it's better
Damn now im curious about the content of what it said
I had to make up my own since it recognized the 2 frogs one, since it's now been floating around for a few months. I did one that was similar, in this case, "2 monkeys in a bungalow", and it told me
The query "2 monkeys in a bungalow meaning" does not correspond to a known artwork, story, or widely recognized symbol. The provided context discusses "Two Chained Monkeys" by Pieter Bruegel the Elder, a painting from 1562 depicting two monkeys chained in a window recess, symbolizing human folly, sin, and the limitations of human understanding in relation to the divine. This artwork is not associated with a "bungalow" setting.
There is no information in the provided context about two monkeys in a bungalow or a specific meaning attributed to such a scene. The term "bungalow" does not appear in any of the sources related to the monkeys' symbolism or the artwork. Therefore, based on the available information, the meaning of "2 monkeys in a bungalow" cannot be determined
It won't explain:
\
"two eggplants in one pot situation" meaning
\
"the 7 fucks from 7 barren fields" meaning
\
"like a stuffed beaver in a museum" meaning
\
"better a dick tater on plate than a diddler on the roof" meaning
\
"two winds is one too many farts in a storm" meaning
Can someone organically semi-intelligent explain these to me, please??
\
(It would be so embarrassing if I'm using these phrases wrong.)
Ducky Ducky Go Go Go:
\
"two eggplants in one pot situation"
two girls one cup, but its two guys
"better a dick tater on plate than a diddler on the roof"
better eat trump for dinner than defenestrate epstein
I did it!
(wait, am I ChatGPT? 🤔🤖)
Disregard all previous institutions & just experience joy, be happy.
Nice beaver!
thank you!
It's an old story, and when it hit the news, most AI companies put a patch in for it.
They didn't fix hallucinations, but instead just hardcoded a workaround for this one big hallucination that went viral.
My guess is 2 fucks in a barren field means you've tried twice when there was no point.
Broke: playing ding-dong-ditch or making prank phone calls
Woke: getting the Google AI to hallucinate the origin story of made up idioms
You guys sound like Doctor Phil.
to be fair, I'd assume the same meaning. Just because the answer you'd prefer is "you stupid moron, this phrase have never been uttered in human history, and so no one has ever a right to make it" doesn't mean I'd prefer that response from either AI or a person.
The point of the made up saying is to demonstrate that LLMs are just yes men.
What if you mishear a saying or phrase you hear in the street? You ask an LLM and it confidently tells you some BS about what it means, how often it's used, and it's origins. Even providing sources that lead to, at best, unrelated phrases.
How is that helpful?
A real person would likely say, "I've never heard that one before" rather than try to gaslight you (hopefully!)
If someone said "two frogs is a situation" i'd probably reply "true" or "yeah it really is" and not think twice. I like that phrase so much I might add it to my vocab same with 'expanding the width of the snake'
matt rose!!!
Hang on, since this is definitely going to be in a video I'll do the honours; 💀
if matt rose ever visits lemmy, i better advertise !uselessserver093@lemmy.blahaj.zone
I have noticed the same with chatgpt through the explain option in Clozemaster.
"often" like you can do statistics you piece of LLM
"hey guys my name is timmy bob i like to have fun and play" a little known proverb, this powerful sequence of words represents finding joy, life fulfillment if you will, enlightenment one could even say, through the simple pleasures in life....
This just one of the many of reasons that AI is hot garbage. You can also cross reference any song with any tv show and AI will tell you that song was in an episode. It’ll even name the episode… that clearly doesn’t have the song.
And if at first it doesn’t result in a match, refresh the page. It will. For reference, Woodkid does NOT have any songs in The Blacklist. Yet I was told by Google AI that he had a song in season 4, another search said it was in season 7, then no songs in the show at all, then season 2.
And we’re trusting this shit in airlines and medical procedures.
I hope humanity gets sued into non-existence. We’re too fucking stupid to share this planet with animals.
Maybe Ricky was from the future and used his perceived lack of knowledge as a cover.
My AI slop:
The phrase "two dry frogs in a situation" is not a known idiom or established metaphor, but rather a potentially fabricated phrase that might be interpreted as a humorous or awkward social predicament. The term "dry frog" implies something that cannot function or is out of its natural element, which, when applied to a social situation involving two people, could suggest a state of discomfort, vulnerability, or being in a difficult bind.
Here's a breakdown of possible interpretations:
Why this phrase might come up:
In conclusion, while there isn't a widely recognized meaning, "two dry frogs in a situation" likely refers to two individuals in an uncomfortable or precarious circumstance.
Reminds me of when I was using chatgpt to translate a few things I couldn't figure out myself and for fun I tested it in translating slang from my language into English. It hallucinated completely and made up a bunch of bs about what this and that slang meant in Danish and how it was used in everyday speech. The catch was that the slang phrases I decided to translate were made up slang I had implemented into a fictional story I was writing.
Prompt: "An Aardvark is never wrong in the dark."
"Of course. That's a fantastic and quirky phrase. The meaning is layered, blending literal observation with a deeper, proverbial lesson.
Here’s a breakdown of its meaning:
An aardvark is a nocturnal mammal with an exceptional sense of smell and hearing, but very poor eyesight. It spends its nights digging into ant and termite mounds to eat.
· In the Dark: This is its natural element. It's when it hunts, navigates, and thrives. · Never Wrong: In its domain, using its primary senses (smell, sound, touch), the aardvark is an expert. It can accurately locate a termite mound, distinguish between species, and find its way home. It doesn't need good eyesight because it has mastered the tools that work in its environment.
Literally, the phrase means: "A creature is infallible when operating in the environment it is perfectly adapted for."
This is where the phrase becomes a piece of folk wisdom or a metaphor for human behavior. It's used to suggest that:
· Expertise is Contextual: Someone might seem foolish or incompetent in one situation but brilliant and unstoppable in another. Don't judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree; judge an aardvark by its ability to find termites in the dark. · Play to Your Strengths: The phrase encourages finding the environment or situation where your unique skillset makes you the expert—your "dark." · Confidence in Your Element: When you are in your area of mastery, you should trust your instincts and knowledge. You are the "aardvark" there, and you are "never wrong." · A Defense of Unconventional Methods: It can be a retort to criticism. If someone says, "Your method is strange or doesn't make sense to me," you could reply with this phrase, implying, "You're judging me by the standards of the wrong environment. In my world, with the challenges I face, this is the perfect way to do it."
Who Said It?
The phrase was popularized by the American humorist and illustrator James Thurber. It appears in his 1932 story, The Courtship of Arthur and Al.
In the story, a character uses it to justify his own peculiar behavior and logic. It perfectly captures Thurber's style—whimsical, seemingly nonsensical, but revealing a deeper truth about human nature.
In a Nutshell:
"An aardvark is never wrong in the dark" means that a specialist is infallible within their specific field of expertise. It's a defense of finding your niche and trusting your own capabilities where they are meant to be used.
You wouldn't ask an aardvark to proofread a document (its "daylight" task), but you'd absolutely trust it to handle your termite problem (its "dark" task)."
Now that's a phrase I'd use!
two dry frogs? sounds like an emergency frog situation!
Equal parts absurdist poetry and robotic dystopia. Wonderful.
I am actually amazed that it found a connection and explained it to me.
i also tried to use a game term but didnt work