I've read elsewhere that he was spreading misinformation -- specifically that is was a MAGA that shot Kirk. which,

1] it is opinion about Trump and MAGA's reaction, not making a statement about the shooter themself.

2] even if he was, it's opinion based on what he knew

3] even if it's wrong, it's free speech

4] even if it's a lie (ie he knows its wrong), that's still constitutionally protected. Fox News even went to the supreme court to protect their right to lie.

"We should have turned authoritarian before they did", basically.

They sass that hoopy frood.

it was to the wrong chain, so deleted it. but then I decided to just not post it at all.

This message is just so your comment is not hanging out naked like this.

I have had the same experience and its frustrating. I mentioned Trumps claim that all his actions are legal, and his reply was "well it was ok when Biden said it", like a knee-jerk reaction.

I had to JackieChan_WHAT.jpg while driving.

To nitpick, the handwritten note under the keyboard got destroyed. So there isn't any any more.

Oracle TikTok isn't on there either.

Oh, that's because they already have a government overseer. And owned by a Party loyalist.

You know what they say. Most people are more dumberer than average.

I wonder if their hate is just a side effect of wanting to be superior over others. And that's what drives their base actions.

cast blizzard

cast blizzarda

cast blizzardaga

dammit where's my grape juice

And to tinfoilers like me, Trump dying is already part of the plan. But perhaps it's happening sooner than expected.

I am sorry for being poor

E: I have donated 2 euro

Sorry. But understand the context im giving you. You don't have to argue that its not true.

JFC I am only explaining the legal and cultural framework. Which should have clarified things for you, instead of making you angry.

fuck the fuck off

Freedom of speech is a broader principle, and existed before the US.

The 1st Amendment ensures our speech is protected from the government; it does not give that right. Our rights are considered "natural rights" and thus law only codifies them; rights are not given to us by the government. Small but important detail.

That is a fantastic article, thank you. I don't know if there is a way around the ennui engine, not without massive systemic changes; seems like it's part of human nature. It seems pretty rational too, from an animal-brain point of view ... to take a sure win right now instead of a maybe-win later.

It's unfortunate that this feeds so many people's anger cycle. I wonder if that's cultural.

I wonder if the internet culture of sharing has died off somewhat. Old guy here. Are people are so used to consuming they forget about sharing? Or maybe it's just the type of person who uses the internet today is inherently more consumer then early adopters?

In my day a big appeal of the internet was to share things. But now it is to consume things.