Skip Navigation

What is your up- & downvote behaviour?

Which posts and comments do you either up- or downvote? Which are you not voting on?

Upvote:

  • insightful post or comment I agree with
  • clever jokes or references
  • being open-minded
  • giving helpful advice
  • any post or comment that made me laugh or simile, whether or not it is "good"

  • good gut feeling about someones intention

No-vote:

  • insightful post or comment I disagree with
  • overused jokes
  • useful bots

  • someone angry venting their frustration(s)
  • comments that already exist multiple times in a thread

Downvote:

  • deliberately looking for a "fight" or rage baiting
  • complete disregard to reality
  • false and/or potentially dangerous information
  • spamming bots and/or trolls
  • inciting violence, no matter against whom (people seem to forget this is a straight up crime, sometimes a felony)

  • propaganda and political or religious extremism
  • know all, better than everyone attitude
  • highly questionable anime content (especially sexualizing characters that look like children)
  • obvious, malicious manipulation
  • AI generated content ( mentioned first by cloudless@piefed.social )

I am really interested in your vote behavior and may also update my list as more things come to mind. These will be listed under a horizontal line.

70 comments
  • Vibe. That's it. I just vibe vote.

    • Word. If I would have smiled at you when you said it in person, it's got my upvote.

      If I'm just talking with someone and there's no vibe, it's a neutral.

      I try not to talk to people who deserve my downvotes. I do fail sometimes.

  • To me upvote/downvote means approval/disapproval, not necesarily agree/disagree. So I've upvoted different posts and comments with different points of view if they are argumented well for and polite.

    I do not vote when I skimm the post/comment.

    That is basically it.

  • I downvote if it looks like they are posting in bad faith. I'll upvote some comments that I disagree with if the poster was trying to contribute to the conversation -- I usually do that to offset the fact that they've been downvoted a bunch already.

    Many of the communities I'm in are fairly small, so I upvote almost every comment that I read. I figure it lets someone know that someone else read what they wrote, and I think that's what a lot of us are here for.

  • I tend to upvote any display of anyone's creative pursuit if I happen to scroll by it. Even if it's not something I'm into. The marker-on-photo-paper guy whose name escapes me, people's photographs in any of the photography related communities, any of the ink doodles, hand made stuff, or comics posted by their original creators.

    We risk very little, yet enjoy a position over those who offer up their work and their selves to our judgment. The average piece of junk is more meaningful than our criticism designating it so.

  • Pretty much same as you listed, actually, but with a few additions:

    Upvote:

    • Mark reply as read as long as it's not something under the no-vote/downvote criteria
    • Pity (i.e. if I don't think a post/comment deserves the downvotes it's getting)
    • I'll usually give posts to the communities I mod an upvote b/c I appreciate the contribution

    No-Vote:

    • Something I disagree with but doesn't merit a downvote
    • A post I don't like that is in a community I'm not subscribed to (i.e. when browsing /all)

    Downvote:

    • Violates the community rule where it's posted
    • Is part of some bandwagon nonsense (e.g. the moths that have polluted the feed in the last several days, beans, etc)
    • Absolutist statements/positions, especially ones that paint the world in overly broad strokes.
    • Ohh, marking replies as read is something I will implement. Never thought about that before.

  • Upvote: well written, adds something to the discussion

    Downvote: low effort, hurtful or rage bait

    I make a point of not using downvotes as an "I disagree" button. If an opinion is presented well, it may still add something to the discussion even if it doesn't match my personal preferences.

  • I have only one strict rule: I see the Moomin comic, I upvote it.

  • I rarely ever downvote. Everybody’s opinion is valid. Downvoting is petty.

  • I don't have strict standards, but generally:

    • usually upvote someone who responds to me with something substantial, even if I disagree
    • downvote things that are antisocial (self-hate/self-harm, antinatalism, misanthropy)
  • Upvote: helpful information, handy tips that are those little nuggets of gold you mine comments sections hoping to find, actually witty comments instead of oft-repeated Reddit style puns, people who actually put some effort in to their post. Basically: stuff I'd want to see if I stumbled on this thread from a Google search in the future.

    Downvote: comments complaining about downvotes, any reference to "tankie" or any other perceived and dismissive stereotype, users who complain about being picked on especially by mods (and usually back it up with some tinfoil fanfic about how they've been tracked by Them), Reddit-isms that were overused there and never worth using here, people who don't source their "fact" especially when accompanied by a comment like "it's easy to find this fact". If it's that easy, you do it.

  • I don't downvote, I dislike this feature. In theory I upvote when it's funny or interesting, but I don't often think to do it. I try to upvote posts in little communities to say "hey someone saw your post and enjoyed it, please continue to share things!" even if I don't comment.

    • Upvote - good point/interesting/funny/agree/posts I like to see
    • Downvote - strongly disagree/inappropriate/poor comment/posts I don't like to see
70 comments