Meta denies torrenting porn to train AI, says downloads were for “personal use”
Meta denies torrenting porn to train AI, says downloads were for “personal use”
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/33724346
"So just to get this straight, you're saying you have downloaded 152 .... zettabytes .... of porn for your own personal use?"
"....Zetabaytes? no.
<mumbles on a hot mic>
it was yottabytes"Thats BabyGroku-bytes
rookie numbers for a bunch of 20 something programmers tbh
Where did they get the idea that that's a more respectable response?
EDIT: Doesn't/shouldn't work for their liability either. Vocabulary fail on my part.
Dignity doesn't matter if it wins the case.
Welcome to Zucc's Fucc & Succ
Zuck’s Fuck and Suck sounds like his product’s effects on society.
We're Sneed's Feed & Seed now, please get it right
I think it's more respectable to provide unfiltered internet than it is to profit off someone else's work without paying them.
Did anyone check on the Meta engineers in the goon cave?
I would not be surprised if Meta advertised such a thing to prospective employees as a legitimate benefit of the job. A built-in VR goon cave with 30 TB of material available. Limit 1 hour per person, bookings required 6 months in advance. Sessions subject to monitoring for security and training purposes. May contain trace amounts of Zuck.
Wouldn’t need any material. Hooks up to your fb and you can pick which of your pals to hook up to the milking table.
Then you should be less credulous. What is told to prospective employees is effectively public information.
I can only imagine the smell of dried cum and server stacks in an enclosed space
Nah, Zuck doesn't let a drop go to waste.
Mandatory gooning during the dailies at meta.
The Matagoon cave sounds like something from the Unix Surrealism universe.
You're joking but it was 2400 movies over 7 years downloaded individually and not in bulk like they blatantly did with books. Apparently over 60% of adults admit to have viewed porn at work so yeah... someone should probably check on the engineers in the goon cave.
"hey steve, did you download a shitton of porn while on the company network?"
"Uuuhhhhh, it's for ai training"
Torrent the Dark Knight to watch at home along and the media companies will sue you for infinity billion dollars. Openly torrent every movie known to man to train an AI and the media companies don't do shit.
Steal 1 movie, you're a murderer, steal 1million, you're a conquerer, steal 'em all? You're a goooooooood~
this comment is oc, DO NOT steal
Well in this case they are trying to do something... This whole "personal use" thing is Meta's response to a copyright claim against them.
It's not a personal Jellyfin server, it's training material for a possible future AGI. It's going to know a lot about terrible horror movies.
Humanity is fucked letting these companies exist.
An even more “glaring” defect, Meta argued, is that Meta’s terms prohibit generating adult content, “contradicting the premise that such materials might even be useful for Meta’s AI training.”
Oh yes, this is true because meta, or any other company for that matter, has never ever in the history of ever changed its terms of service...
I can only assume the MPAA will funnel vast sums of money into helping prosecute these thieves? Any minute now right?
One wonders how much child porn was in there....
But it's AI, so itsa aaaaalllll fine
It's kinda weird how spwsific you have to be with certain models to not make them vwry very young looking people
It's better to say child sex abuse material (csam), the term "child porn" both legitimizes the conent, and infers children could ever be active and consenting participants
sexualised content involving children is abuse and should be labled as so
that's mafia level response
Hahaha, what a story, Mark! Anyway, how's your sex life?
"define 'sex'. no, wait... define 'life'."
So their AI is so technologically weak that they can’t even blame it for all the porn downloads, eh. SMH.
Ok, but why would anyone bother training AI on porn? Seriously, I don't understand
An article I read when this came up a couple of months ago said that basically porn was the best way to show AI unclothed human movement. Watching clothed humans move, you can get the basics but can’t see how the muscles are working. If you show it a Hollywood movie, they might see occasional shirtless scenes or artfully lit and blocked out sex scenes. Porn has the greatest amount of naked people moving their bodies.
Gen AI porn and shitposts are the only 2 decent use cases I've seen of gen AI.
You can't make half of those without training it on porn.
Just to add I've seen a full 10 second clip of AI gay porn and it was very, very realistic, with only some minor things that set it off as fake. It's gotten to the point where I'm afraid I'm cumming to clankers now.
At this point, I'm betting you don't hear news about image models as the cutting edge is in anime titties and celeb nudes.
Video generation, copyright matching, CSAM detection, those are just the first few that pop into my head.
got it. thx
Have you not heard that everyone is now doing NSFW chatbots? Meta is just trying to catch up with Grok and Chatgpt
probably for the AI to learn how to detect NSFW content???
Yeah. Sure. That's where the money is. Yup.
Its the best datasets for human anatomy.
Liars. So many liars these days...
Well, someone at facebook needs to come collect their jerk-off trophy.
Zuck, you dirty wanker.
I think they already came
yes, and epstein trafficked all those children to himself.
Most for personal use, m-porno
💀
As an aside, a great deal of CSAM is shared through Facebook, they've been asked by CSAM survivors to stop this and they said no. The advocacy survivor group Phoenix 11 submitted six formal questions in the US Congress to old Zuckface fuckface about it, as he deployed end to end encryption which makes this possible, which he dodged like the lying fuck he is. Zuck would sell it himself if it made him a whole dollar and nobody should forget that.
I completely disagree with your take here.
The idea that we shouldn't have services with end to end encryption because "think of the children" is an absurd take to have.
I think you're being upvoted because its anti Zuckerberg, but seriously people, think about the long term consequences of not being able to chat without being spied on.
Which is frustrating as every single time the government wanted to expand surveillance on regular citizens, preventing this is always touted as the justification. Now we have all the surveillance and the monopolies are like 'Nah, exploitation is profitable'.
Zuck's just an omega-level gooner, swearsies!
Why do you think Facebook exists?
Basically its inception tbh
Omegle gooner? I’d believe it.
Groomer