"You exist to make money for us"
"You exist to make money for us"
"You exist to make money for us"
Although I disagree with Dr. Oz's premise, his argument that he's given here is sound.
And a person who makes that argument must believe in universal healthcare. Because there are people out there who can't work today because of health issues, or who are caregivers for people with health issues.
Universal healthcare also allows people to start their own businesses without fear that their decisions will lead to worse medical outcomes.
There may be nothing better for the old GDP than universal healthcare.
The true enemy in healthcare are not utilitarians. It's the small government idiots and the authoritarian sycophants.
Of course, as Dr. Oz is a MAGA conservative, I assume that he doesn't actually have this logical consistency. He likely doesn't even care what he's saying and just makes the most convenient immediate argument and doesn't have any underlying morality that it is based on, except to support Dear Leader, because that's the MAGA way.
The thing is that they've lost the plot. Yes it's good to have everyone healthy so they can contribute to society and keep the economy healthy. But the point of growing the economy should be to make the country better for the people. It should feed back to better quality of life, more opportunities, better education, new useful and fun technology. The goal shouldn't be to grow the economy just so the billionaires get richer.
I don't doubt that Dr. Oz has evil underlying motives. But that isn't the argument that he's made in the quote we're talking about.
Small businesses also have workplaces and also contribute value to the GDP, and meanwhile, large businesses are often holding back our GDP by intertwining themselves with the government so that they don't actually have to compete. They love that people get their healthcare through their businesses today because that makes them closer to slaves.
A person who actually has an underlying moral view that would make them make Dr. Oz's argument would be beneficial to work with to get true public single-payer universal healthcare. (I just looked it up, and Dr. Oz has only supported a private sort of UHC, which is not completely in line with the quote we're looking at, to no surprise.)
I don’t think they’ve lost the plot. They’re just the flesh puppets for a superorganism whose plot is orthogonal to human values
I am with you on everything you said. But some dark humor hit me and I had to share. There is more than one way to make "everyone" healthy. Sure universal Healthcare seems like the obvious solution. But what if we just kill all the unhealthy people. Lies, damn lies, and statistics. :)
Oh you mean the gop plan
the orphan-crushing-machine dialectic.
Or give them loans that can't be written off on bankruptcy. 😈
Man they don’t even have the sense to know what the quiet part is anymore
oops I crapped my pants
edit you know i was joking but now that i think of it, so many of them have Resting Oops-I-Crapped-My-Pants Face [or Resting Oops-I-Am-Crapping-My-Pants Face] it cannot be a coincidence
It's one of those rare cases in which both sides should agree- whether you believe a government is an institutional arm of people who agree to collectively take care of everyone, or whether you give no shits and only want to make money. And yet somehow America still has terrible healthcare.
Yeah, but some of that healthcare would make its way to non-white, non-Christian, non-men.
This is what's so infuriating to me. There are so many policies we don't implement not because it would be a net negative even for the economy, but just because some people are too afraid of giving anyone a "handout" that they "don't deserve" or something.
Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness record CEO compensation.
I think a more subtle point is that even by the most Business-oriented, cold, calculating, empathy-devoid, mathematical take possible were humans are nothing more than wealth generating cogs, the system is still shit because it's not using said cogs in the most optimal way (which requires the "cogs" to be healthy and at least somewhat content with life).
In other words, even by the criteria of the hardest of hard Right, the system we have is shit because the over-exploitation of those they see as wealth producing peons and sub-optimal allocation of resources for necessary auxiliary social system means the entire system is producing less wealth than it could if said "wealth producing peons" were kept in better shape and more content.
I honestly agree with him- but only because people who are healthier and productive tend to be a lot happier and better off overall and not because GDP go up.
The government and economy exist to serve the people. That's democracy.
We need Luigi now more than ever
“You are worth keeping alive only as long as your owners can continue to extract value from your existence.” - Dr. Oz
Why do you think the right are always wanting to cut Medicare? The faster you die after 65 the better!
Kind of the right thing thing for the wrong reasons. Helping people be able to function is of course the goal of a health system.
But like with everything, the government exists not to look after the interests of the citizenry but to create the right conditions for business.
I think I first figured that out when I was learning about the governments’ historic treatment of native Americans. They really only sent the army out to the frontier when there was a major business venture being harmed by unrest.
You will be a healthy slave. We need more biomass for our mass murder empire.
The mask has come off. Huzzah.
Honestly, I'd be fine with it, if it actually led to the part where the population is healthy enough to work and thrive if they so desired.
But that's not what they're saying. They're saying they want to keep you alive long enough to keep working past your retirement age.
Quality of life never factors into financial projections, so their goal is give the bare minimum to the people who can pay for it. The part where he says "If you so desire" is so incredibly loaded I am surprised it didn't make a loud crashing noise when he said it. Tell us what the alternative is Doc Oz. What's the alternative??
take it from me, the years you are capable of working are more valuable to you than the years you are not, regardless of what you do with them. if you are unable to work, there's a damn good chance you amassed quite the list of things you were unable to do before work got added to the list.
And yet they appear to be trying to make people sicker
IF you're sick, you work more to afford healthcare and also give them more money.
Until we automate your job with AI and or robotics.
Even these stupid fucks admit that by privatizing basic needs it causes severe economic harm yet still they cannot give a damn.
An analog from education and affirmative action: the arguments that ultimately got it through the Supreme Court was that diversity helps white students with additional perspectives. There was a social justice argument, but the courts didn't care.
I bring this up because there are people for whom these soulless arguments work, and sometimes that's an ok stop-gap as my example allowed thousands of people into education. If it gets people healthcare, some would argue it should be included in the list of reasons.
I'm not exactly in that group who buys that, but I admit I don't know what will ultimately get Americans their right to healthcare.
Thanks Oprah!
She seriously may indirectly be one of the most dangerous people in recent history for boosting useless grifters lile Oz and child traffickers like Phil McGraw.
but the reason we're getting sick is work-related stress, sleep deprivation, and bad diet in first place. The correlation between poverty and early death is undeniable
I don't like where Nominal Dr Oz is usually coming from, but the bare transactional relationship isn't all that wrong.
We participate in many social contracts in our day-to-day life. We hold doors, we say please, we pay for things, we clean up our mess; these are part of what makes us not dirtbags, but it's a relationship that has rules; it's why that asshole listening to loud music or shouting into a phone held like a pizza slice (where are the reality-show cameras?!) inspire such offense.
In the larger society, we work to get money for basic needs. We pay taxes into a consolidated pool for the things that are bigger than our household. We elect people to manage our stuff for us, because we learned that we can't individually manage the commons without tragedy. Parks, clean water, reliable power, all of this needs to be provided and maintained for the public with public money managed by people chosen by the public who can do that best. When that fails, we get Trump.
Healthcare is like parks: we can't afford it individually, and our ultimate focus on the 'I' and the 'now' makes us bad managers. So we appoint people to manage the best healthcare system we can build, try to keep selfish conservatives from corrupting it for their own gain, and we fund it from taxes. Obviously, this is another part that Americans may not be aware of, and so I'm hoping they can just go with it for a sec.
And there the relationship is plain: healthcare wins when everyone's a healthy, productive, contributing member of society, naturally. When that happens, everyone also pays taxes as per a proper sliding scale (again, Americans will want to suspend disbelief and imagine that's happening while their own system isn't doing that effectively right now), and taxes fund, in part, more healthcare.
A healthy healthcare system exists directly to improve the health of all people in society, and indirectly funds its own existence.
While qualitative KPIs are hard to show concretely, more healthy, smart, working people pay more tax, and that's quantifiable. Pared down to a brutally simplistic relationship, it's good healthcare <-> more tax paid.
I support this. Sure, I want people to be healthier, just like I support schools I'll never attend just because I want people to be smarter. But this healthcare<->taxes thing is something I can sell to the selfish, transactional-thinking conservative dirtbags as a quantitative, invest-now-profit-later kind of thing I think speaks to most conservatives and the shrewd investment-porn they want to believe they're part of.
I'm proud to occupy a position where I pay far more in taxes than I'm currently using in services; and having been on the other end of it more than once, I'm very glad to be paying healthy taxes because that's a far better problem to have. I think we pay too little taxes above a certain earnings level - this region removed its scaled supplemental medical services payment and so it's supported only from tax proceeds - and I worry it's put our healthcare at risk of manipulation by populist shitheels trying to cash in on a sicker healthcare system (America: you are here) and tell us it's the only way to do it (America and London and Paris: you are here), and I wish it took a healthier portion even though it makes poor-kid me a little sad if I can't keep more for myself. But that's how it is, because that's the contract we all enter into by existing in this region under the rules we vote on and upheld by people we choose.
I just don't think this angle works. It relies on the listener correctly reasoning out how society works
"Raising the minimum wage would cause inflation". Is this true? No, it's been tested and studied. Most people believe this anyways
"Who's going to pay for healthcare?" We pay for healthcare already! Single payer healthcare would save nearly everyone a lot of money... But we're stuck at this hurdle. Even though we can pull billions out of midair for the military, and apparently fucking Argentina
There's all these myths that sound reasonable on the surface and get repeated constantly, and you can't reason people out of them. They can only do it themselves
I think when people start talking about their taxes going up for healthcare, we should shame them. We should treat them like they said we should kill poor people so we can slightly lower the cost of pet food
So what happens after you retire?
You don't. You die.
With what?
dude you can't just say the r word
oh yeah RUTABAGA
i accept the judgement of the mods
You don’t retire.
You expire.
people retire? with what?
hehe that's a funny word
My senior year English class (2005), we had to write a philosophy of life paper, and mine was a tongue in cheek pessimistic outlook where we existed to reproduce and produce. It was intentionally incredibly insincere, and yet here we are 20 years later and I've unfortunately hit the nail on the head.
I mean, sure. If we as a society believe that healthy and informed citizens make a better society, can we please work on that? Sure, a side effect is that I'll probably get more healthy years and will work longer - we need that anyway since we can't sustain the pyramid scheme our grandparents relied on.
To say this administration wants us healthy or educated is quite a stretch though.
I will work longer. In return I want a healthy environment, kids well educated, people who can't work taken care of, and the resources I need to stay healthy and work.
A little late for mutual prosperity, Capitalists.
Also, this ignores the rampant ageism that is ever-present in the workforce.
In today's economic circumstances, you are probably best working until you are 65 or more, unless you want to be impoverished in your later years. Also, your health care is tied to the workplace for the most part. Unless something changes drastically to correct this - something like UBI and/or better SS/Medicare, better ACA, etc., that's just the way it is.
In addition, biotech may add years of healthspan to people's lives, meaning they would be very able to work and live healthy lives much, much longer than was expected of prior generations. On the other hand, you have this accepted culture where it's like people start signaling to people as young as 35 that maybe they are getting long in the tooth.
I mean....what in the FUCK? How is that math going to work out in the aggregate?
assuming you can afford all these medications, and treatments that is.
Fuck Dr Oz
got rejected from the senate, because his name is too foreign sounding by the right wingers, and ends up being on trump the only one that will hire him.
Monster
At least they say their goals in public
Next up: depression, what is it, and how much does it cost the economy?
Yes that's the point of health so why is don destroying the system.
Weirdly, I agree with this statement. "Work gives you purpose." is something that my friends dad once said, that I only recently gotten to understand the meaning of. I have severe treatment resistant clinical depression and the only time I get a sliver of relief is when I'm at work and my brain is firing on all cylinders. It's only when I'm alone, on my own time is when all the feeling of inadequacy and self hate creep back. So yeah, if the whole purpose of the healthcare system is to keep me health enough to be a cog in the machine, then so be it.
Because, seriously, what's the alternative? Is your endgame to slouch on the couch all day? Is your end goal in life to be a sloth? You got to contribute, otherwise this whole thing doesn't work. And to make it work, you gotta work.
Cool, now remember that works for you and we're not all the same. Work, for me, induces depression. I'm most happy in life when I have nothing to do and have to find creative ways to fill my time. Never once have I derived meaning from work, not once.
Yeah, as much as I'm like the person you're responding to, I get some people are and some people aren't. Some people never want to be part of that work system, and that is totally fine. I get antsy when I have off work, but some people are probably the complete opposite and get depressed just thinking about going to work. I feel like we'd all be better off if we didn't force people to work. Nobody who's forced to work is doing the job well. Let's just do the whole UBI thing, and if you want to work you work and they give you some extra cash on top, you buy more shiny stuff, whatever.
There are other things in life besides work and doing nothing, several other options.
Yeah, work is great. A majority of people like working. What a majority of people DON'T like is being a slave, working 100 hours a week and sleeping 5 hours a night, sacrificing the rest of your life, sacrificing health, family, happiness, etc. all so the people in control can squeeze every last nickel out of us until we die from exhaustion and despair. That is what people object to, and that is what the ruling class wants. Nobody is suggesting that everyone should just sit on the couch and watch society collapse because nobody is keeping it running. People want fair treatment with a healthy work/life balance.
That's funny, because it works the other way for me. Always had trouble getting into a groove at work, as soon as it happens I remember my effort is wasted protecting someone else's money. I only get just enough in return to come back tomorrow. The only time I can really dig in and lose track of everything else, is when I work on my own projects, for my own sanity. I could spend centuries following my own hobbies, and someday I hope to be able to give back to everyone, not just my boss.
The alternative is that we stop grinding everyone into dirt, give some free time back to this generations Einsteins. FOSS is a monolith of proof that we don't need to be threatened with poverty and death to 'be productive.' Given the technologic breakthroughs over the last century, we should already be living in a utopia.
There are many conditions that make it near impossible to work full time with enough consistency to support yourself. So many cancer treatments cause permanent damage, so even if you are in remission, you're too ill to work. Complex medical problems that require frequent, unpredictable visits to clinics are simply incompatible with hourly work and have a significant impact on 9-5 salaried positions because so many clinics only operate during those hours. Add to that, people who work in manual labor positions are often at risk for injury, both acute and chronic, which means they can't do the jobs they are qualified to do. There has to be a support system for cases like this where you need to transition to a new work regimen depending on your new limitations. If that support system isn't there, isn't reliable, or adds additional burden, it's not going to help people recover. Making people feel worthless because they are temporarily or permanently unable to work is not a solution for anyone who isn't an asshole.
I think you gotta put more work (hehe) into defining what you mean by “work”.
Some people think of work as an inherently exploitative activity, where someone who owns the means but lacks the skill to use them loans the means to someone who has the skill, in return for some of (most of) the benefits of the labor.
I think that arrangement actually strips a lot of fulfillment from life, because the people who do the work don’t get to make decisions and the people who make decisions aren’t forced to understand the real impact of those decisions.
But if you just mean “doing something useful” or even “doing something meaningful” (since much of what gives life meaning isn’t explicitly useful), I think it would hard to disagree with you.
I think a lot of people who call themselves “anti-work” aren’t opposed to putting effort towards something meaningful — I think it’s actually because of their sense that their day job is meaningless (and maybe even undermining meaningful pursuits) that they call themselves “anti-work”.
thats propaganda by corporate shills. you can be productive without working yourself to death. why do you think there are scientists/ junior technicians or stem workers, they are passionate about thier field. seems like your issues is a personal problem
theres a saying if you are bored all the time, you are boring.
Bootlicker
I'll never understand why normies love these freak grifters. They all look weird too. It makes no sense to me.
Team players. R next to their name means they are all in, regardless of what their policy is.
As much as i dont believe politics should be like sports, the unfortunate truth is, it is.