jjjalljs @ jjjalljs @ttrpg.network

Posts

0

Comments

1,670

Joined

2 yr. ago

They dont usually have benefits (eg: health insurance) or time off

There was a thread about cheating the other day and someone posted that they think cheating is... How did they put it... binary? Like there are social groups where everyone cheats and its normal, and then there are non overlapping groups where no one cheats.

Ah, I found it: https://lemm.ee/comment/20529741

I don't think I know anyone who cheats in relationships.

If you can't tell people are working productively remotely, you have no business being a manager.

It reminds me of the "missing missing reasons" post, which describes how for some people reality creates emotions, but for other people emotions create reality

The first viewpoint, "emotion creates reality," is truth for a great many people. Not a healthy truth, not a truth that promotes good relationships, but a deep, lived truth nonetheless. It's seductive. It means that whatever you're feeling is just and right, that you're never in the wrong unless you feel you're in the wrong. For people whose self-image is so battered and fragile that they can't bear anything but validation, often it feels like the only way they can face the world.

I'm pretty sure it's downstream from the war on drugs, which was motivated largely by racism (and anti left wing sentiment, to some extent)

This reminds me of the new vector for malware that targets "vibe coders". LLMs tend to hallucinate libraries that don't exist. Like, it'll tell you to add, install, and use jjj_image_proc or whatever. The vibe coder will then get an error like "that library doesn't exist" and "can't call jjj_image_proc.process()`.

But you, a malicious user, could go and create a library named jjj_image_proc and give it a function named process. Vibe coders will then pull down and run your arbitrary code, and that's kind of game over for them.

You'd just need to find some commonly hallucinated library names

As the title says, moderation is key. If the game is just "whatever is the most convincing right now" then I'm going to be annoyed that I sat down to play D&D/fate/gurps/whatever, and we're mostly playing improv. It's important to set expectations in or before session 0.

If I was looking to join a game, and the GM was like "We're all about the rule of cool", I'd probably ask for some examples. If it's like "we let the [D&D 5e] wizard cast as many spell as he wants" then I'm not joining, because that's going to fuck up the game balance. On the other hand if it's like "we don't really care about carry weight unless it's extreme", that's fine.

Stuff in the middle, like "one time we let them use create water in the bad guy's lungs to drown him!" can go either way, but I'm usually not a fan. Mostly if I ask myself "if this works, why doesn't the whole setting revolve around it?" and don't have a good answer, I won't enjoy it. Like, if everyone could do lethal damage with a cantrip, or if the "peasant railgun" worked like the joke, or "we let the real life chemical engineer make napalm and mustard gas as a 1st level rogue for massive damage", then that probably isn't for me.

The GOP really is the worst of us, and removing it would do wonders. The Democrats aren't perfect (or even good half the time), but they're like herpes compared to the gop's aggressive cancer.

Betterment offers 4%, insured up to $2m. I think you can go higher with a refer-a-friend , but that program might be over.

That's a good point. I think that's why most financial advice recommends a mixed portfolio. Index funds that follow the market, but also like bonds and safer things.

If I luck into seven figures of money, I think I'd hire a professional to give advice. Or at least do a lot of research.

You can get 4% from a high yield savings account. That's insured. That's still $360,000 a year (taxed as income). You don't need to expose yourself to a lot of markets and "down years" . I mean, if the us government collapses and insured accounts are lost we all have bigger problems.

At 2.5mm you'd still be fine at 4%. Six figure salary for doing jack squat.

Of course, not everyone can budget and they might burn into their principle. But, like, don't do that. 🤷

Do the needs stay satisfied, or is it going to be like 2 years later we have billionaires and starvation again?

I don't think the average person is so dangerous that it justifies having driving infractions be handled with firearms by default.

I don't think you even need to force a stop. If they don't stop when asked to pull over, you have the license plate. That's registered. Send them a ticket or court summons. If they refuse to come to court, then you can have some muscular folks go resolve the issue.

Granted, I'm just spitballing. But I don't think the current system works at all.

If there is a civil war, I'm sure the enemies of the US would rejoice. It's like that onion article that's like "al queda decides to sit back and watch US destroy itself".

But aside from that, I hope the conservatives lose. And I hope after they lose, we learn from history. Don't just let them come crawling back into power like after the first civil war. The ultra rich and their lackeys need to be removed from power, and kept out.

Then again, the 14th amendment should disqualify Trump and a bunch of the republicans, and that doesn't seem to matter.

I'm pretty sure some places use the traffic ticketing as income, which is a huge perverse incentive. Or maybe they just have quotas. Or benefit from seizing property from people. The police are a problem, but i'm sure this community is aware.

I feel like the people doing traffic enforcement should be different than the police. Like, they shouldn't have guns and authority to search and murder. Just, like, a radar gun. and the authority to issue tickets and direct traffic.

If I had $9 million dollars I would be done. That's line a six figure annual salary if you put it in the safest of safe investments.

Rich people suck

The conservative mindset seems to be "What's good for me right now?". The law is good when it hurts their enemies, and it's unfair when it hurts them. A policy is good when it benefits them, and bad when it benefits someone they don't like. They are essentially toddlers. We should treat their ideas as seriously as we'd treat a two year old's ideas. Yes dear that's a really interesting idea to replace all the toilets in the building with monster trucks, but we're not going to do that.

Many people have found that using LLMs for coding is a net negative. You end up with sloppy, vulnerable, code that you don't understand. I'm not sure if there have been any rigorous studies about it yet, but it seems very plausible. LLMs are prone to hallucinating, so you're going to get it telling you to import libraries that don't exist, or use parts of the standard library that don't exist.

It also opens up a whole new security threat vector of squatting. If LLMs routinely try to install a library from pypi that doesn't exist, you can create that library and have it do whatever you want. Vibe coders will then run it, and that's game over for them.

So yeah, you could "rigorously check" it but a. all of us are lazy and aren't going to do that routinely (like, have you used snapshot tests?), b. it's going to anchor you around whatever it produced, making it harder to think about other approaches, and c. it's often slower overall than just doing a good job from the start.

I imagine there are similar problems with analyzing large amounts of text. It doesn't really understand anything. To verify it's correct, you would have to read the whole thing yourself anyway.

There are probably specialized use cases that are good- I'm told AI is useful for like protein folding and cancer detection- but that still has experts (I hope) looking at the results.

To your point, I think people are trying to use these LLMs for things with definite answers, too. Like if I go to google and type in "largest state in the US" it uses AI. This is not a good use case.

That's really not the same thing at all.

For one, no one knows what the weather will be like tomorrow. We have sophisticated models that do their best. We know the capital of New Jersey. We don't need a guessing machine to tell us that.