Skip Navigation

User banner
User banner
fellagha @ fellagha @lemmygrad.ml
Posts
2
Comments
29
Joined
1 wk. ago

  • What's your approach to engaging in a conversation about politics in the company of people who hold reactionary beliefs?

    Jump

  • Nice to hear your perspective and recent journey! The priority, in the end, is not dwelling on "losing" a "debate" with a smug lib, but learning more and more about why they're wrong, from observing world or domestic societal affairs whose class characteristics can put into perspective moving forward, to simply reading theory.

    There mere existence triggers me sometimes and their smugness makes my skin crawl.

    Exactly what bourgeois media trains them to. Those acquaintances won't be so smug anymore once their beloved Western "democracy" crumbles further, they'll be faced with a choice. And you could impact that if they're people you know well / are close to - even if it won't magically make all libs becomes leftists, obviously.

  • What's your approach to engaging in a conversation about politics in the company of people who hold reactionary beliefs?

    Jump

  • That's an interesting approach, efficient way to flip the script and shut down all the propaganda which is exactly meant to DISTRACT from what happens at home.

    ..and progressive politicians are shot down during takeoff

    Indeed, which serves as material proof that achieving socialism within bourgeois electoralism (or "democracy" as it labels itself) is not sustainable because it does not overthrow the ruling class (bourgeoisie) in favor of a new one (proletariat), and instead leverages the tools of the existing ruling class. Makes you think of a certain Allende.. Or those who simply sell out.

  • What's your approach to engaging in a conversation about politics in the company of people who hold reactionary beliefs?

    Jump

  • Yes we should never stop explaining, but people will only listen if the material conditions provide the incentive.

    That's why I said this:

    applying theory to give succinct explanations to real-world phenomenons in the neoliberal world anyone would understand

    If said material conditions were not present, this would be not only pointless but also nearly impossible. Especially because the contradictions are already sharpening in the West now.

    A point I intentionally glossed over because it was largely meant to generalize and apply not only to Westerners, is the labour aristocracy and similar class dynamics. The portion of the working class still far from disillusioned, who have been bought off by working class concesssions from the bourgeoisie derived from imperialist superprofits.

    Look at the pension situation in Europe, and France's latest austerity measures, as an example. What happens is that most of them, once this affects them, are captured by reaction instead of revolution, the default under the imperialist capitalist superstructure. This is giving rise to a majority of fascist sympathies once the last liberal has been scratched, which you implied. The tiny organized left in the imperial core, where this happens, is a drop in the ocean as far as "reversing" this entire phenomenon is concerned.

    ..it is not in my opinion- not a good use of time to debate with reactionaries. Those that can be convinced will sooner be convinced by reality as they have been so far. Those that cannot be convinced will serve to make reality worse (which works in our favor) and ultimately be destroyed as a consequence.

    This I won't disagree with, because "debating" with them means to speak on their terms which should be avoided in favour of simply turning the script in your favor if you're forced to be around them in a given situation. Secondly, the good side of this is absolutely that they will accelerate the utter exhaustion of every single attempt at "saving" and "reforming" capitalism until they eventually discover that there's nothing to lose from the current system. Imperialist capitalism has leveraged world wars to "salvage" itself, though, which we shouldn't forget.

  • What's the deal with Ba'athism?

    Jump

  • He wasn't. He was inspired by Nasser initially, but ultimately developed his own socialist theory in the 70s, called the Third Universal Theory (Green Book), which was the manifesto of the Jamahiriya, and he opposed capitalism. The Jamahiriya, which basically means a "government of the masses" was an actual socialist state which abolished private property, and proposed the end of the rule of one group over another. Gadaffi was originally highly pan-Arabist, but later on he pivoted towards pan-Africanism due to the material reality of pan-Arabism being dominated by a national bourgeois current. This made him an even bigger threat to the West than any pan-Arabist, knowing African resources sustain the West's wealth.

  • What's the deal with Ba'athism?

    Jump

  • You could call it a form of Arab secular bourgeois nationalism that is also very left-leaning despite really being state capitalist, and as a result not free from capitalism's inherent contradictions. Not nationalism as in chauvinism (which is the case for Western nationalism), but nationalism as in national liberation. It believes in the nationalization of key industries and most of all sovereignty, emerging as an anti-imperialist / anti-colonial ideology in its core. Where it differs from de facto "socialism" is that it usually doesn't advocate for the abolition of private property, hence the "state capitalist" factor. Nationalization of key industries, as mentioned, in a resource rich region, was the reason it was a threat to Western imperialism in the first place and the US had to destroy Ba'athist countries.

    It was born due the fact that capitalism in West Asia and North Africa was not an organic development, like in most of the world. It was a colonial imposition as these regions, which had a wide array of different pre-capitalist modes of production, were forced to vanish on a large scale, meaning a significantly smaller national bourgeois class existed that was responsible for leading a sovereign movement.

  • They'll carry on doing this during and after the ceasefire

    Jump

  • The cubans have gusanos, the Chinese have bananas, and the Indians have coconuts. what term does your country have for the imperialist bootlickers?

    Jump

  • Nothing universally agreed upon here, idk if there is such a thing, but one I like to use is "Harki", or more correctly "Harka" (حركة) for all pro-Western North Africans and mentally colonized or liberal diaspora types that idolize / suck up to Europe and the West, and often denounce or tokenize their roots for "white" approval. Naturally these are imperialist EU / US bootlickers who blame not imperialism and neocolonialism for the struggles of their homelands, but use an inversely "racist" inferiority complex instead.

    This term derives from a fifth column during the Algerian struggle for national liberation against the French colonial forces, the Harka were Algerians that supported and fought on the side of the French colonizers. The FLN kicked them out (and their master, France, of course) and they were exiled to France, giving us insufferable mentally colonized diaspora intelligentsia types who internalize Western racism against their own people, and sure would not mind French recolonization.

    Very Algerian-centric but I like to use it for any Western / imperialist bootlickers from my region (North Africa) lol, most often in the diaspora. The term simply means "movement" (in the context of volunteer militias), so it's not derogatory by definition, only in this context.

  • How does lgbtq+ support as well as other progressive ways of thought co-exist in religious people while their religious text proclaim it as a sin?

    Jump

  • Ahahah, can't blame you. I guess I would call myself an "atheist", even though I hate the fact that this term has been co-opted by pseudo-intellectual Reddit liberals and nihilistic hyper-individualists and bears a negative connotation for some lol

  • The subtle manipulation of language.

    Jump

  • The subtle manipulation of language.

    Jump

  • We're only permitted to critique one bourgeois warmonger at a time? How convenient for the US empire lol. Your "lesser evil" is a mass murderer and imperialist like every other Western leader. This man oversaw the droning of thousands, including countless civilians and children, across multiple sovereign nations, the destruction of Libya and Syria in 2011, plunging the countries into chaos from which they never recovered to this day, the bailing out of the banks that crashed the global economy while leaving the working class to drown in foreclosures and debt, the expansion of the surveillance state that has only grown since then.. and that's only the beginning, really.

    Class war isn't a team sport between two reactionary parties, and nor is it "good cop vs bad cop". One manages imperialism and the exploitation of its own working class with a smile and "inclusive" rhetoric, the other doesn't.

  • The subtle manipulation of language.

    Jump

  • Fuck that war criminal, and fuck the ruling class he served that still exists today

  • How does lgbtq+ support as well as other progressive ways of thought co-exist in religious people while their religious text proclaim it as a sin?

    Jump

  • Glad it was of some use!

    If you don’t mind me asking, where have you seen the growth

    I should clarify that it doesn't exist on a massive scale, but it's still noticeable where I live despite lots of people still being bigots and homophobes ofc. Some neighborhoods around here with significant amounts of left-leaning young people here are quite accepting of LGBTQ+ ideas or at least open-minded, and the phenomenon of emerging LGBTQ+ acceptance barely is different from anywhere else in world (exposure to the ideas whether in person or online, gradual rejection of dogmatic thought, etc).

    In typical Marxist fashion, we would say it's in the superstructure of class society, i.e. how culture, religion, politics, social relations relate to and are shaped by the "base" (the mode of production, property relations, etc) and vice versa. I believe that one of only reasons that, for instance, Western society is able to sell a facade of progressiveness in regards to LGBTQ+ rights, is because it can be co-opted by capitalists, often monopolizing firms, and gain a new consumer base to expand profits through marketing itself with tokenism of these groups. This means an artificial imposition of these "LGBTQ+ rights" which don't do away with the reason they are marginalized and discriminated against in the first place, as evident by many Westerners still being highly reactionary regarding the cause like anywhere else, only exception kind of being the so-called gen z and millenial generations (the age groups most disillusioned with late stage capitalism and the dogmatic thought that supports it, mind you).

    What we need to do away with is the fundamental cause for all forms of bigotry in the first place, which results from private property and class relations to the mode of production - in our period of history, it's capitalism that leverages bigotry to divide the proletariat and prevents them from uniting against the bourgeoisie, the ruling class, by scapegoating eachother. It's a trick, because hatred towards any minority or marginalized group will not pay rent, will not preserve your savings, will not eliminate inflation, will not give you infrastructure, healthcare, education, sovereignty, etc. and will not improve your life in general. Basically, when we change the "base", through a socialist mode of production and eventually communism, we erode the fundamental dynamics of society which pave the way for bigotry and division to begin with. Cuba's recent progressive LGBTQ+ legistlation (family code) is brilliant example of this, gaining support among the majority of Cubans voting in the referendum. To simply claim that "religion inherently causes x", or "culture inherently causes x", and so on, is to use idealist analysis (or lack thereof) as opposed to dialectical and historical materialism.

    Also, since we’re talking about interpretation, we have evidence of evolution and the big bang severely contradicting the religious explanation. Do you always take it in the sense of interpretation there?

    I can't really say tbh, since I'm not religious myself. I suppose it can vary greatly, and religion isn't necessarily a dogma after all, otherwise we would not have syncretic Islamic sects, or for example Christian denominations which all differ greatly (many of which blend indigenous folk religions together with Abrahamic teachings, Alevism comes to mind). It's so much more than just an answer to the great "why", but an entire set of culture, traditions and moral codes tied to anthropology, but again it all depends on what religion means to an adherent I'd say.

  • Gonna make an account on Reddit soon. Any good advice or browser extensions I can use?

    Jump

  • I don't use it myself, but some good extensions I'd recommend for any bourgeois website with trackers, CDN bloat, and fingerprinting elements of all kinds. Besides uBlock Origin which you mentioned, are ones called LocalCDN and ClearURLs. Both are also FLOSS. Similar ones probably exist but these are just the ones I've been using.

    LocalCDN substitutes CDN-derived page elements with local elements on your PC by injecting them through emulating a sort of CDN where ever possible, bypassing some remote content. ClearURLs clears tracking garbage through web navigation basically.

    Also, hopefully you dont use Chrome lol. That pile of spyware imperialist Silicon Valley crap needs to be boycotted, just like Silicon Valley needs to be bombed to pieces

    Hope it helps!

  • What stage capitalism is this?

    Jump

  • That's putting a lot of faith in socdems and reformists lol

  • What stage capitalism is this?

    Jump

  • This is laughable even by the logic of bourgeois economics. The profits enjoyed by said restaurants would just be diverted towards supermarkets selling produce that become ingredients in their lunch - much of which shares the same supply chains said restaurants use. I guess this is a "both sides-ism" but for capitalists themselves lol

  • How does lgbtq+ support as well as other progressive ways of thought co-exist in religious people while their religious text proclaim it as a sin?

    Jump

  • I believe it's because there's a fundamental difference between a personal, lived spirituality and a politicized, ideological weaponization of religion (co-optation by ruling classes throughout history) - which itself contradicts the core teachings of Abrahamic religions, such as Islam, which do not teach hatred. The point is not to force a literalist, often revisionist, interpretation of ancient texts onto everyone else, but to find personal meaning and community within a faith tradition while upholding universal human rights.

    The goal is to criticize said interpretations, specifically the politicized, fundamentalist interpretations that exist in all faiths which are used to justify bigotry and violence (and the inverse - these being presented by bourgeois media as the "defaults" to justify dehumanization and imperialist wars against adherents). The goal is not to vilify the religion itself or its billions of peaceful adherents who are on their own spiritual journeys. Whether religious or not, bigotry like LGBT-phobia often exists due to lack of experience and engagement with these people (or other marginalized groups) and common internalized taboos that really are not limited to religion. By far most people are able to open their minds once they become acquainted with and actually learn about LGBTQ+ in the first place, and realize that there is no difference in our humanity whatsoever and that we are one - no matter what our genders, sexualities or identities are. I live in a Muslim majority country, and there are LGBTQ+ venues here and an emerging community expressing itself, for example.

    And as Marxists, religious or not, we know that the very origin of widespread bigotry of all kinds is not something that is internalized out of the blue or to blindly be "accepted", but something that arose from now ~7000+ years of class society.

  • Based Kid

    Jump

  • Based. Shame that Amerikkkan schools would throw whoever wrote this in a juvenile detention centre.

  • tfw no gubmint backup

    Jump

  • Nothing of value lost, fuck that illegal puppet state. Can it just collapse already?

  • Don't fall for it

    Jump

  • Mutual dialogue! Two-state solution! Every opinion matters and is equal! Social Darwinism is a valid philosophy! We all need to work together as a nation! Freedom, democracy, civil society and human rights! We're helping all these poor people around the world! Unemployed people are just lazy and don't want to work and contribute to society! Capitalism offers wages as a rewards system, how motivating! We're spoiled rotten! Poverty is a personal responsibility that the individual must take action to combat!

  • Does Lemmygrad have an active Psychology Community?

    Jump

  • We should not seek to blame someone, but the "something", which leads to all these repeating patterns of subconscious and hidden ideology within the capitalist-imperialist superstructure. All imposed onto people unbeknownst to them through conditioning that exists everywhere under capitalism.

  • World News @lemmy.ml
    fellagha @lemmygrad.ml

    Trump says Israel and Hamas have 'both signed off' in first phase of Gaza ceasefire plan

    www.middleeasteye.net /news/israel-and-hamas-both-sign-first-phase-gaza-ceasefire-plan-says-donald-trump