Skip Navigation

Posts
2
Comments
474
Joined
3 yr. ago

Seer of the tapes! Knower of the episodes!

  • I read it 10+ years ago. As I recall, its main point had to do with differences between Old World and New World populations.

    Since Africa falls into the Old World along with Europe, I don't think the book actually supports any conclusions about this topic.

  • What are you trying to say?

  • For example?

  • Between 1500 and 1865, more than 80% of enslaved Africans were shipped to the Americas by European slave traders.

  • Nations that were the source of slaves remain on the whole impoverished and underdeveloped.

    Nations that were slavers still remain on the whole wealthy and highly developed.

    This is not a coincidence, and there is a reasonable case to be made for reparations on these grounds.

  • All words all symbolic of their referents, but the symbolism is usually arbitrary. So I don't think there are actually any words like that.

  • SEER of the tapes! KNOWER of the episodes! TREMBLE before my encyclopedic knowledge of Star Trek!!

  • Live fast and get fucked indeed.🖖

  • That's cash bail, not a bond.

  • Unlike bail, you don't actually pay a bond unless you violate its terms.

  • No. We won't be able to solve the problem because we refuse to believe that viable solutions are any more complicated than "put person in house".

  • Normalizing political violence will inevitably, and possibly literally, blow up in your face.

  • When my paid Paramount+ subscription included unskippable ads.

  • How to interpret that sentence:

    1. The USA has its faults
    2. Other countries compare themselves to the USA
    3. THEY find THEMSELVES lacking

    How not to interpret that sentence:

    1. The USA is actually superior.

  • "And" what?

  • What would you think of that person?

    I'd think they're wrong. And I'd spend my time explaining why.

    But I wouldn't take their opinion personally; I wouldn't be upset by it; I wouldn't feel compelled to question their intelligence, morals, ethics, or motives. I wouldn't complain that they're being unfair, chauvinistic, or sheltered.

  • This user seems to think the US superior to all other countries

    I said no such thing.

  • You already started.

  • Because it's not a sincere question asked in good faith. It's just another attempt to evade addressing anything I actually say in favor of insulting my intelligence.

    No, I don't speak other languages fluently. I speak some Spanish and a little French, and I can cuss you out in Japanese. But English is the only language I speak fluently. And if you were half as sincere as you no doubt are going to claim to be, you'd have realized that I NEVER SAID I AGREED WITH THEM. I only pointed out that they find THEMSELVES lacking.

    I answered the OP's question honestly and accurately to the best of my knowledge, understanding, and perceptions. Which is WAY more than you or any other respondent has done.

    So, go ahead. Mock me for only speaking gasp one language! It doesn't make me wrong.