Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)A
Posts
4
Comments
525
Joined
3 mo. ago

  • Perfect example of Google maps issue, is that we did Grampians on the weekend here in Australia. And, it still had a road/track which had been completely deleted (probably long ago). And it wasn't on any other maps.. There was a rusted sign that had been long removed and sawed off sitting where the route clearly used to be, but no sign of route anymore

    These days, most people tend to just use AllTrails or Avenza because they're convenient. For Thru hiking (really long hikes), people tend to use products (apparently) like Captopo which better facilitate planning, tagging on long hikes and time calculations (I am hoping to do a thru hike soon).

    In practice though, stolen untested routes used in Alltrails present their own problems though, as, the Alltrails team don't actually check if the routes are safe or correct. I suspect they just steal them from other sources. But, for most people, its great as its convenient

    OpenTopo/Openstreetmaps are commonly used as the source for a lot of mapping systems though, as it tends to be up to date and accurate in most places. (i use it on my garmin etrex 32x as a backup). I was also advised to use Strava Heatmaps on a hike I am planning to do to find water in certain locations, however, I use GPX Map viewer Pro, and use people I trust for routes if possible (or make my own).

    Google Maps is great for roads, but, the data simply isn't that accurate for anything else. And, there is no good way to report bad hiking routes. With OSM and other things, they can be fairly easily fixed

  • This is a very rare occasion. In the real hiking community, nobody uses Google maps

  • Facebook is no longer properly moderating their platform

    Let's stop pretending like there isn't constant incitement laws being broken, abusive behavior and constant racism.

    What were they expecting? Normalizing criminal behavior and giving meta a hall pass because they're a large company?

    This isn't a "gross loss of privacy". That's total BS. It's a private service which is responsible for a shitload of criminal issues. I'm not even talking civil / freedom of speech. There are constant witchhunts and abuse happening on it. I've seen so many ACTUAL violent threats against people too.

  • Have you been on Facebook? A lot of adults need supervision at this point.

  • Yep. At this point, since you can't read the site without logging in, everything in it should be deindexed by Google

  • Facebook is literally full of people inciting others to break laws breaking laws and Facebook refuses to remove anything. Even violent incitement I'm seeing

    Truckies in particular are abusing Indians and the amount of racism all over has gotten excessive. It's not uncommon to even see subtle violent incitement

    It's an unpopular opinion, but this is definitely a good thing.

    I'm tired of getting ignored by Facebook because some a-hole has told others to ignore a law and incited hate towards various groups of people.

    These are actual laws being broken and it would be good to have more powers to enforce them, because Facebook are profiting from abusive people.

  • Don't worry. Pauline Hanson who apparently "hates" crime and knows that Muslims are at fault, will obviously fix this.

    She's currently in the UK hanging with a guy who was convicted of crimes like Assault and harassment.. When she returns though, she'll have plenty of time to speak well of the suspected pedophile/convicted tax-cheat and independently, defend the suspected war criminal.

    But totally, she'll stop crime

  • Good luck with that

    1. There is no good way to write any criminal law, as I said

    2. As a condition of sale (civil) It would potentially completely fuck steams reputation. Gamers don't like companies who sue their customers. If I gift a steam controller to a partner who becomes an ex and they sell it, suddenly I get sued. Great

    3. Every steam critic would use it to attack steam.

    4. You cannot add a condition of sale in many countries to control the resale of a physical product. There are literal ownership laws . Which is the point I'm possibly not making as clear as I need to be

    5. They could just limit 1 per customer and require a deposit to stay in the queue. And offer something beneficial like a free game which directly is added to the account that orders. But that screws people who are getting them as gifts. Or prioritize people based on library size for the initial orders / randomize the queue a bit

    6. The reason I said write the example, is because what is the penalty going to be? Cancel their account? Disable the hardware?

    Again, it's a bad idea. You're trying to solve a problem that normally doesn't exist, won't in 6 months and will cause a much bigger one.

    As much as I hate scalpers, this is delusional that can not only legally not be enforced in many countries, but would be criminal in many countries and have a huge probability to backfire

  • A lot of it yes. But, I tuned out by the end, the moment I realised they didn't even identify media bias.

    It comes down to ONP doing what MAGA did in US. Flooding the zone. Like, news stations are giving people like Pauline an unreasonable amount of airtime. And Facebook is designed to promote ragebait which ONP uses.

    It really is just THAT simple. Nobody can hear them, because Pauline is shouting over everyone. Even stupid bullshit like the poster thing, she was given plenty of airtime to blame police, and pretend like she was in danger, without the other side of the story (that it was a poster). They give more attention to the shooters parties than Greens (despite Greens having more seats)

    You tell me if this shit is journalism, or an advert: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/pauline-hanson-reveals-new-plane/video/eaee05b10463865e0cd49f2e0b0427e8

    https://www.skynews.com.au/opinion/pauline-hanson-shows-off-new-plane-gifted-by-gina-rinehart/video/f031e3da44abddec185fdcefb0a41f06 . Oh look.. He reckons "this is great!"

    That's an example of the problem. If Greens got a new plane, I guarantee Sky news and all the murdoch media would attack them instead. In fact, any time people like Albo get on a plane, they start attacking "greenies"

    Murdoch media is doing things like presenting interfering with war criminal cases as a good thing, and will NEVER give airtime to people like the greens. And, unless the greens compromise their values, they won't get that airtime.

    Ask yourself, when has the Australian or Sky News even mentioned the policies of the greens? They sure have every shitty right wing party

    The only thing that has changed is that Murdoch recently started pushing ONP more, instead of Libs/Nats.

  • write an example

    There is no clean and good way to write this law imho

    When I say loopholes, I mean ones that further harm people affected by scalpers. It's easy to say "oh, we'll write a law". The problem is writing one that doesn't backfire completely.

  • Because you have Murdoch controlling most of the media and other people like Gina buying a lot of it too

    That being said, I suspect a huge amount of the people on Facebook look like bots, and I think most Australians won't be voting onp.

    The only thing that has changed in the past year is that they've said they'll win. But, don't forget they've been losing 3 decades of elections

  • Digg was actually pretty great. I tried to return to it after Reddit started getting dodgier, but it was already dead.

  • It's even easier to move now that you need an account to even read old reddit.

    I would have thought that since they're providing a different view to Google as most users, they should be kicked off Google too, but they haven't been

  • No derp.

    And, after privatisating it, we set up the nbn which is just another Telstra basically. There was no reason to ever sell it

  • I think that's the exact same thing they hit me with.

    The crazy part is that i don't think I've even dated a local in years here (my last girlfriend was Chinese, and my previous one Pakistani) I have a lesbian family member, and we have plenty of gay and trans people who I hang out with most weeks in my climbing group. And I lived in a Muslim country for years

    I'm the first one always telling others to let courts handle everything too and (yep, even Trump), and reporting all the subtle violent threats on Facebook people make and argue with them publicly that they're being a**holes

    It doesn't seem uncommon for people to get incorrectly accused it seems there either

    I didn't even abuse anyone to the best of my knowledge.

  • You got to appeal? In my case, for my temp ban, it said there was no appeal process

  • Jesus. Who is actually up voting this?

    The name of the charge in some countries is use of the phone when driving.. and that includes carrying it on your lap. It's possible despite the description it's just the description they use

    There's a fucking photo of her with it on their lap. That's proof

    This is just some wanker playing victim. And, I guarantee they play victim constantly. Can we not act like babies about this and try to protect the weasels?

    It's 2026 and most people have Android Auto or car play at this time. It's not like there is any excuse.

    It's fair for the one that turned out wrong, but in this case, seems it's correct.

    Also, it's some shitty random website, so I guarantee the info is partially wrong too. There is already one correction that it wasn't flock

    If it was the police who pulled these people over, they'd be arguing with them too

  • Police have better shit to do than mobile phone enforcement

    And, in what circumstance should they be speeding? That makes no sense. If there was a valid reason, you can contest the ticket anyway

    There sure as fuck is no valid reason for them whatsoever to have their mobile on their lap