Nah. A bunch of llm code review agents say that produced code is of high quality, fire anyone who said it would have taken for them to implement same functionality more time than I have spent
Not the best description doesn't cut it, it's just false description. I can easily write a system with 100% test coverage, bugged as hell and containing so many weird abstraction tricks that it takes a significant effort to figure out even what is happening in the simplest scenario. And yes, part of that hundred percent coverage is going to be llm style: test that something does what you already know it does
Hits me every time. I may know I am right and the other person is wrong, but the amount of re-education needed for them to realize it - undoable for me
If it didn't mean unspeakable amounts of suffering and were in my capability, I would have him removed from the office and then run for president against a woman again. Just to see the same bunch of clowns actually vote for him, again
That makes more of us. Educated - of course, but also allowed.