Skip Navigation

User banner
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)G
Gutless2615 @ Gutless2615 @ttrpg.network
Posts
1
Comments
136
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Plex will be blocking access from at least one VPS provider

    Jump

  • My dude if it’s taking hundreds of hours to get Kodi set up for you that’s a you problem. I’ve paid 0$ for Kodi XBMC or jellyfin over the past forever.

  • Does someone know the organizational structure of Proton and Tutanota? How democratic is it? How hierarchical is it? How are decisions made? How are tasks determined and distributed?

    Jump

  • Why?

  • Ignored by police, twin sisters took down their cyberstalker themselves

    Jump

  • What absolute bad assess.

  • A few weeks into the Premiere League season, anyone have a go-to streaming site now?

    Jump

  • Sports surge

  • Watch a swarm of drones autonomously track a human through a dense forest

    Jump

  • Thanks I fucking hate it

  • ISPs Should Not Police Online Speech—No Matter How Awful It Is.

    Jump

  • You didn’t read the article, did you?

  • Big Tech companies are finally getting the names we thought dystopian megacorps would have

    Jump

  • You want a trip down “is this a cyberpunk dystopia company” name, go check out the data brokers on the data broker registries in Vermont and California.

  • [RANT] I pay $70/mo for this privilege

    Jump

  • TF you smoking? I pay 25€/ mo. For gigabit connection with no data caps. The US is getting hosed because it’s a corporatocracy and the ISPs have acted like robber barons for the past three decades. Don’t normalize this blatantly anti consumer bullshit.

  • Teens Hacked Boston Subway’s CharlieCard to Get Infinite Free Rides

    Jump

  • Good

  • Any way to listen to music (privately?)

    Jump

  • Gotta pirate it unfortunately. Buy it on band camp and support the artists directly, then host it yourself. Navidrone works great.

  • Removed

    Do you trust Brave company and their products: Browser, Search, VPN, etc..?

    Jump

  • Only barely as far as I can spit.

  • Japan Decides That Copyright Doesn't Apply to AI Training

    Jump

  • And while we’re at it let’s throw out mashup artists, collages, remixes and fair use altogether, huh? You’re just incorrect here, fair use exists for a reason, and applying the four factor fair use test to generative art comes out on the side of fair use nine times out of ten. What’s more, what you’re arguing for will only make it harder for small artists who get spurious accusations lobbed their way or automated take downs from bad “ai detector” software and have to drag out in progress files and lawyer money to argue they didn’t use generative tools in their workflow. There are better ways to make sure artists can still get paid - and, spoiler alert: it’s not just the artists that are going to get hit. We need to embrace more creative solutions to the problems of AI than “copyright harder”

  • Japan Decides That Copyright Doesn't Apply to AI Training

    Jump

  • Yes exactly. When someone is creating art using stable diffusion it is clearly a manifestation of that artists intent. That is what copyright is designed to protect and should protect.

  • Japan Decides That Copyright Doesn't Apply to AI Training

    Jump

  • It isn’t, and that wasn’t what the monkey selfie lawsuit was about. The monkey selfie lawsuit in fact supports the idea that generative art can be protected, if it demonstrates a manifestation of an artists specific intent. The monkey selfie wasn’t copyrightable not because a monkey isn’t a human; but because the monkey didn’t know wtf it was doing when it took a selfie.

  • Japan Decides That Copyright Doesn't Apply to AI Training

    Jump

  • You do realize individuals can train neural networks on their own hardware, right? Generative art and generative text is not something owned by corporations — and in fact what is optimistically becoming apparent is that it is specifically difficult to build moats around a generative model, meaning that it’s especially hard for for corporations to own this technology outright — but those corporations are the only ones that benefit from expanding copyright. Also, I disagree with you also. A trained model is a transformative work, as are the works you can generate with those models. Applying the four factor fair use test comes out heavily on the side of fair use.

  • Japan Decides That Copyright Doesn't Apply to AI Training

    Jump

  • Your argument that it is useful as a copyright infringing machine is that it can reproduce a public domain work? That’s… not the argument you think it is.

  • Japan Decides That Copyright Doesn't Apply to AI Training

    Jump

  • Expanding the terms of copyright to 70 years after the life of the author actually didn’t help artists make art. Expanding copyright to cover “training” will result in more costly litigation, make things harder for small artists and creators, and further centralize the corporate IP hoarders that can afford to shoulder the increased costs of doing business. There are inumerable content creators that could and will make use of generative art to make content and they should be allowed to prosper. We need more fair use, not less.

  • Japan Decides That Copyright Doesn't Apply to AI Training

    Jump

  • Expanding on the already expansive terms of copyright is not the appropriate way to deal with the externalities of AI. This copyright maximalists approach will hurt small artists, remix culture, drive up business costs for artists who will be dragged into court to prove their workflows didn’t involve any generative steps, and as with every expansion of copyright, primarily help the large already centralized corporate IP holders to further cement their position.

  • Japan Decides That Copyright Doesn't Apply to AI Training

    Jump

  • The absolute right decision. Generative art is a fair use machine, not a plagiarism one. We need more fair use, not less.