FiskFisk33 @ FiskFisk33 @startrek.website

Posts

1

Comments

1,131

Joined

2 yr. ago

yeah, only time will tell.

I think the word itself, italian being closeish to latin, evokes the killing of jesus.

not my greatest moment hah

well, for those of us who need stable employment, whole markets going downwards isn't necessarily very good either

looks like graph theory to me

It's up to the American standards, for what that's worth.

Honestly, not much.

in a democracy the latter has to be preceded by the former.

Preliminary findings from july

• First, X designs and operates its interface for the “verified accounts” with the “Blue checkmark” in a way that does not correspond to industry practice and deceives users. Since anyone can subscribe to obtain such a “verified” status, it negatively affects users' ability to make free and informed decisions about the authenticity of the accounts and the content they interact with. There is evidence of motivated malicious actors abusing the “verified account” to deceive users.
• Second, X does not comply with the required transparency on advertising, as it does not provide a searchable and reliable advertisement repository, but instead put in place design features and access barriers that make the repository unfit for its transparency purpose towards users. In particular, the design does not allow for the required supervision and research into emerging risks brought about by the distribution of advertising online.
• Third, X fails to provide access to its public data to researchers in line with the conditions set out in the DSA. In particular, X prohibits eligible researchers from independently accessing its public data, such as by scraping, as stated in its terms of service. In addition, X's process to grant eligible researchers access to its application programming interface (API) appears to dissuade researchers from carrying out their research projects or leave them with no other choice than to pay disproportionally high fees.

https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_3761

I went to rome once, and I found people to be super unfriendly. Like, giving me looks levels of unfriendly.

After a few hours of this I realized the problem, I was wearing a Deicide t-shirt, and rome is christian as fuck. God I'm stupid.

After a quick change people were really nice :D

that or insurance companies

peer networks are not illegal if the peers are consenting members.

Totally doable if this was a distributed service.

ok not randomly generated, but you know

nah

not even a slight chance kids today know what msn messenger is.

The older "Dog in the hunt" is a bit less grim.

Unless you're a fox...

are you implying firefox is in a state of neglect?

That includes Amazon, right?
...right?

UwUntu

what? It wasn't empty. There was, um, something about... hmm I don't remember.

OP is a high level rouge with a CHA dump stat.

oh come on, thats a nitpick if I ever saw one.

We're generally discussing two alternatives: noon att zenith(ish) vs noon at zenith(ish) - 1hour

Sure, well just solve this problems how we have already solved it. Something along the lines of a mean or median value.