FiskFisk33 @ FiskFisk33 @startrek.website Posts 1Comments 1,132Joined 2 yr. ago
Sure, well just solve this problems how we have already solved it. Something along the lines of a mean or median value.
funny how technically the marlboros are the most natural thing of these
good luck with that, danskjävlar.
12 is at suns zenith, done.
If we want to adjust our working hours, we can do that, no need to change the clock itself.
in winter you go to work in the dark and come home in the dark, meaning you don't see any daylight apart from at weekends,
That's already my reality as it stands
On the contrary. They can hide this kind of thing in the numbers. Reporting on egregious individual cases has a chance to heighten awareness.
Nah, a democratic nation has to follow its own laws. It looks much better if they revoke it with proof after due process.
A few friends of mine used to have a sms-based group chat we used for many years. One of those friends kept losing phones and getting new numbers. At some point one of his older numbers texted something to the tune of "what the fuck is this, why are you texting me?!". It turns out the old number had been reassigned.
then again, no state secrets were exchanged.
What's the point of a summary that's longer than the article itself?
that is not the image you showed.
they're a type of eagle candy.
looks fine to me, the problem is on your end, or it's intermittent somehow.
Me neither. I would have thought this was exactly the kind of situation impeachment was meant to stop. I am thoroughly confused.
two words: presidential pardon.
No one will spend the time, money and effort to prosecute these people when they can just wave the whole thing away with a signature.
hmm, true enough. But in my mind there's a clear difference between showing information unedited and referring to its source, and this.
That's a good point, that muddies the waters a bit. Makes it hard to say wether it's spouting info from the web or if it's data from the model.
I can't comment on actual legality in this case, but I feel handling personal data like this, even from the open web, in a context where hallucinations are an overwhelming possibility, is still morally wrong. I don't know the GDPR well enough to say wether it covers temporary information like this, but I kinda hope it does.
Maybe he has a insta profile with the name of his kids in his bio
Irrelevant. The data being public does not make it up for grabs.
‘Personal data’ means any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person (‘data subject’);
They store his personal data without his permission.
also
Information that is inaccurately attributed to a specific individual, be it factually incorrect or information that in reality is related to another individual, is still considered personal data as it relates to that specific individual. If data are inaccurate to the point that no individual can be identified, then the information is not personal data.
Storing it badly, does not make them excempt.
then again
but it also mixed "clearly identifiable personal data"—such as the actual number and gender of Holmen's children and the name of his hometown—with the "fake information,"
The made up bullshit aside, this should be a quite clear indicator of an actual GDPR breach