lemme know when those authcom communities are advocating purging the western world of anyone who isn't white and enslaving the rest of the world in a christian theocracy.

Is that true? For what value of “many”? My impression is that—in the Anglosphere anyway—“auth” communists who once were anarchists is even more common. We’re fed a lifetime of anti-communist propaganda, and comparatively little ant-anarchist, and I think that people seldom arrive there along a straight path.

I’d like to see a breakdown of anarchists per capita by country. I think it’s predominantly a Western movement, but I don’t have data to back that up.

Yeah but they arent as known for lying and infiltration.

Thank you.

You also downvoted multiple posts discussing the Uyghur genocide, and that were about, exclusively, criticism of the Uyghur genocide.

I genuinely do not remember doing this, but i apologize.

Either you're bullshitting now, or you weren't reading anything you were voting on then; just, I don't know, giving up and downvotes according to who was being responded to, I guess?

I do vote irresponsibly and occasionally vote things that i go back to later and go "why the fuck did i upvote/downvote this?" I've been called out for this before too and i want to be more careful with voting in the future.

I guess you don't know much about the Holodomor either, considering you and the rest of the admins left that lovely bit of denialism up as well.

I literally said that in my comment. "I know nothing about Holodomor or Xinjiang, nothing at all"

If calling you out for being part of a fucking moderation team that removes one form of genocide denial, but 'conveniently' seems to ignore every major form of tankie genocide denialism is malicious

Dude, I know about zionism + the Gaza genocide, that's something i can confidently act upon. I literally told you i know nothing about what's going on in Xinjiang / what happened in Holodomor.

what the fuck do your actions come off as? Benevolent?

Besides the voting which in retrospect was wrong, literally what actions; i haven't removed a single comment or post in this situation.

The fact that you're being downvoted for your comment after walking it back can probably be turned into a statement about the human psyche, but I'm not creative enough to make it.

Nobody said this was something the people wanted to do. It's said to be what the authorities thought are the most effective measures for countering terrorism.

This is "everything I don't like is antisemitism" levels of denialism.

Suppressing a culture destroys that culture. If people cannot express their culture, it will eventually die out as the people become assimilated into the culture of the empire that is supressing it. That's what makes it genocide. You kill off a culture even without needing to kill actual humans. (Which is to say nothing of the forced sterilisation, which is a far more direct form of genocide.)

That's a much narrower definition than the UN uses, which is what matters in terms of international law. In particular, the intent doesn't have to be to totally destroy the group, so suppressing its numbers still counts. It's a semantic argument, but for a word so loaded as genocide, letting people dodge accusations by picking a different word isn't helpful. Obviously, this one isn't the most serious genocide going on right now, as there are Israeli cabinate ministers explicitly saying it's their goal to kill all Palestinians, but that's not a great defence for crimes against humanity.

You're whining about being called a tankie and banned, while repeating tankies talking points.

The definition of genocide by the UN convention:

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

If the target is to destroy a group as a group and any of these acts are committed, it is genocide. Mass murder is the "prevalent" act, but it is not a requirement for genocide.

Hardly

Dbzer0 is a math instance,
Lemmy.ca is a Californian instance,
slrpnk.net is a space themed one,
Lemmy.ml is an instance for the country of Mali.

Check the instance sidebar

edit nevermind some admin removed my Easter egg, lameee

The term is deeply tied to both eugenics and fascism, Nazis would label modernist art, queer people, Jews, disabled people, and leftists as “degenerate”. There really isn't a reading that's not describing people as subhuman.

Using it assumes there’s a “pure” social body and that some people are contaminants. It's a pretty clear indication that the user is operating from a worldview fundamentally at odds with anyone that values solidarity and liberation.

“degenerates” as a pejorative is almost exclusively used in crypto-fascist and red-brown spaces.

Really? Public voting helped find vote manipulation.

It becomes even easier to manipulate votes with private voting.

Yep, the second the anarchists weren't in 100% lock-step with the cryptofascists, the cryptofash started lumping in the anarchists with the Marxists as "tankies." I called this a long time ago.

You really going to defend that fascist?

thank you i have several posters of him on my ceiling

I think they're just confusing it with individual attacks?

If the reports of forced sterilization and birth limits are true then it seem likes that dolus specialis is met, but … maybe I’m too generous with calling genociders genociders.

Especially since I’m not THE authority which gets to label one as such I think I’d always err on the side of calling something that walks and quacks like a genocide a genocide.

Anyways, thanks for the response, it’s reasonable even if I think it’s wrong,

And there's no answer, I think this dude is confusing you for another person, or is lying to save face of a community.

Just look in your chat log. I've a pretty unique nic, as do you.
But you don't respond to public questions in your comms either.

It is better than centralized reddit bullshit where regime whores enforce right think.

At least here we see these rifts in public.

I mean isn't that the whole point of trolling?

I haven’t really seen evidence of that user being an asshole to everyone.

hc tolerates transphobia; db0 doesn't.

This you? @muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com

Federate hilarious chaos so I can engage with the piracy com without switching accounts and all axes will be discarded.

Munted's got his own bundled axe in this argument.

Edit : There's some comments with receipts lower down.