Skip Navigation

Jerry Seinfeld says KKK is ‘actually a little better’ than Free Palestine movement

182 comments
  • If anything good has come of this Israel-Palestine conflict thing, it has been exposing idiots.

    • Specifically pretend-progressive idiots, for whom progess is great when it's for their approved groups.

      • Seinfeld is a known conservative. Has never been known as a progressive.

      • Idk, I never would have learned about all the "nuances" within the far right about this issue if not for what happened to Charlie Kirk. It's not just a pretend-progressive idiot thing. Idiots across the political spectrum have done some very interesting mental gymnastics over this conflict.

        Charlie Kirk made some clearly antisemitic statements during his career, but he also fully supported Israel in this conflict. That is fucking dumb, but also sounds pretty on point considering Trump supports Israel in this conflict, yet refused to admonish his neo nazi supporters who were caught on camera during rallies doing sieg heils before his first term. Or his supports that marched with torches chanting "Jews will not replace us." Not to mention some dude on Ketamine who hopped on stage during his second inauguration to do a few more sieg heils just to really rub it in.

        Apparently the shooter was a fan of Nick Fuentes. Fuentes hated Charlie Kirk bc he believed he was "too moderate" in his far right views. Ok...

        Nick Fuentes is apparently a Holocaust denier and has called for the death of jews in a holy war. He is very upfront and honest about his antisemitism. I guess this makes Fuentes the kind of guy Jerry Seinfeld apparently prefers as opposed to anyone who might otherwise just simply disagree with him about Palestine.

        Nick Fuentes also called Charlie Kirk a hypocrite for claiming to be a Christian while supporting genocide and murder of hundreds of people on a daily basis.

        I can't argue with him on that particular statement. However, it also seems just a bit hypocritical to be an antisemite calling for the death of jews, while claiming to worship a jew who sacrificed himself for the sins of the world, and only asked in return that you love your God as the creator of all things and love your neighbor as yourself.

    • But the infestation is bad, so widespread. It's like moving your fridge and there are thousands of roaches under it.

    • I mean I'd prefer people not being idiots. But yeah

  • Sorry Jerry but I don't hate Jews but I hate the government of Israel

  • What's the deal with black people? They're not black, and they're not people.

    -Jerry Seinfeld (probably)

  • Oh look everyone. It's the "airline food" guy who peaked in the 90s. He has a political opinion.

  • So. after WW2 Jewish people can obliterate an entire population just because they were attacked. boohoohoo What if the USA did the same thing in Vietnam, Korea, Afganistan, Iraq, etc? How is starving civilians to death is this fucking right Israel? You are making yourselves the new German Party of 1933. Netanyahu is the new Hitler. He ignores the international community, just like Hitler, kills innocents and does not admit it, just like Hitler. He kills starving children ffs. How low do you want to go Israel before you become what you've feared for 80 years? It's an international disgrace. Even trump is telling you to stop now, I mean WTF dudes?

  • Who, oh ya that soso comedian that got lucky with a tv show about nothing.

    Useless twat.

  • This is what happens when his little sitcom has been out of syndication for nearly three decades. Starts going crazy.

  • The problem with activist groups that spring up online is there's no leadership to keep it focused on it's goals.

    There's a one-upmanship that happens where everyone is competing to get attention for themselves regardless of whether it hurts their movement. One person hates Netanyahu (understandable) the next hates the soldiers participating in the war and that gets more attention. The next hates anyone that has ever been in the IDF, gets the attention, so the next hates everyone in Israel. On and on it goes until we start seeing people hate any business that has ever had any association with Israel, and any political group with any association. Eventually gets so that only way to get attention is to express hatred of all Jews. Just have to use the word Zionist (no different to how white supremacist types use Globalist) so you can avoid association with the Nazis.

    And what was this movement originally about? Helping Palestinians? How does deplorable behaviour help Palestinians? It doesn't. But it get attention, it gets internet clout which can be monetized.

    The Free Palestine Movement is no longer a movement that's helping Palestinians in any way. It's just a hate group full of attention removed.

    • Yes. If you're part of the IDF and aren't trying to minimize your effect and get the hell out, you're a bad person.

      The US has never had mandatory service in my life time, but when I was called to serve in Bush II's wars, I was proud to refuse.

      If the Free Palestine Movement had a central origination, you'd just be criticizing that instead. BLM sort of had a central origination that was misusing funds, but the decentralize aspects never really lost focus.

      • I'm not talking about an organization, I'm talking about actual leadership. There's a difference. There's no Martin Luthor King for the Free Palestine movement, there isn't anyone that can call out the bad actors who are manipulating the movement for their own ends.

        The BLM movement as you mentioned got associated with a shady organization. There wasn't a respected leader that can say "we have nothing to do with that shady organization" so it was kinda convincing to some. But since there were enough existing leaders from the Civil Rights era and politicians to explain it, the message got across well enough to many people.

        The Free Palestine movement doesn't have anyone that can do that. There was no one within the movement brave enough to denouce Hamas the day after October 7, so the movement is associated with Hamas. Which means it's associated with the genocidal acts of Hamas. So the constant screams about genocide by the movement sound hypocritical to any bystanders. There were a few politicians like AOC that had sympathy for the movement that were harrassed for failing to pass the purity tests of the worst people in the movement. The Free Palestine movement is unable to form alliances with anyone. It's carcinogenic to mainstream politics because no one can trust those within the movement to not say something overtly antisemitic. And those fears are confirmed when people in the movement talk endlessly about it being the Jews preventing them speaking at an event.

        It's gotten to the point where I don't think it's possible for there to be a leader of this movement now. It's not possible to pass the purity tests of the radicals that want to be more radical than everyone else.

        The game of one-upmanship has made the Free Palestine movement is completely out of touch with the rest of the world. There's protests at syngogues, harrassment campaigns against holocaust museums and somehow y'all believe the rationalizations about these actions not being antisemitic. Nobody outside your little group believes those rationalizations.

        You're just a hate group to the people that don't frequent your online forums.

    • Jerry, is this you?

182 comments