Skip Navigation

Youtube frontend are not the solution!

In my opinion we need to support other websites like odysee and peertube. If everyone here continue to watch content on yt we won't have a real alternative. This is my thought. For me the best alternative right now is odysee and I'm trying to watch only creator there. (If u want a list of content creator I can write it down)

41 comments
  • Odysee is a nonstarter for me with its lack of moderation, resulting in a lot of right-wing hate filled garbage. Also, their thing with using some virtual currency and paying creators is weird. I want no part of cryptocurrency or "space dollars" or whatever they want to call it. PeerTube is ideal but not enough people are posting to it, which is frustrating. Youtube frontends, like invidious, are our best solution until creators move to something else.

  • they're a part of the solution: yes you're watching content from youtube, but you're in no way supporting youtube or its creators financially by doing so.

    there's no difference between using freetube and quitting youtube altogether as far as google is concerned, and it's a good option for people who want to protest google but don't want to miss out on content.

  • Well it's not like we can follow a youtuber on peertube, odysee or removedute if they don't post on those platforms.

    • If a vlogger chooses not to post anywhere other than Youtube platform, he should face zero disadvantage? Unless you are literally addicted, why would you facilitate her laziness in not engaging at multiple platforms?

      • Zero disadvantages? You mean like having to give up your identity to Google? Having to follow an ever increasing number of rules? Having videos demonetized for weeks until the appeal process runs it's course. Yeah, no disadvantages posting on Youtube.

        " ... why would you facilitate her laziness ... " Because I'm lazy and can't be bothered to check 10 to 20 video sites per day to see if she posted a new video. The people I follow have an average subs of 5.7 million. What incentive do they have to move to another platform? The small number of people using a frontend isn't going to make a difference.

        How is making a number of accounts on different platforms going to encourage a Youtuber to move?

  • When it comes to European content, especially the Czech and Slovak ones, there is no alternative in the case of YouTube. Every content creator here is on Meta's platforms, Reddit, and/or YouTube. So the only way to watch them without ads (I'm supporting some of them via superchats) is to use an AdBlock or an alternative frontend like Tubular.

  • One thing I think is that such platforms are built to manipulate the user into staying with them. Having what feels to be ADHD, I can have several different interests at once, and if they're done online, it's always miserable to cycle through sites to check one or two things, and so the interest to check such smaller platforms starts waning.
    One thing I have found that helps mitigate the problem is aggregation systems, like RSS readers, Grayjay, NewPipe and the sort.
    Maybe tools like those would be a start? Several of Youtube's alternatives support RSS and are supported by either/both NewPipe and Grayjay (with some overlap and plans to expand from each).
    Also if the user is bent on ditching Youtube completely, but doesn't want to make a hard cut, doing a transition instead, Youtube also has RSS and integration to both players.

  • There's one called glomble that's picking up a little. Granted it needs people to donate to the platform as well if they want things to load faster than 30 megabits per minute

  • Freetube has an update today (at least for Linux). Seems to be working much better now.

  • The main issue with YouTube alternatives that makes people not want to move is they can no longer watch their favorite creators because none of them want to move from YouTube. Especially the ones whos entire JOB is making YouTube content.

41 comments