But were you laid off at the same time your company announced “low-performer layoffs?” That’s the real problem here. That claim could be grounds for a class-action slander/libel suit.
In my case it was the company that was poorly performing.
And I agree that they should talk to a lawyer about that. There are pretty strict rules about what you can say about someone who was fired and I’m pretty sure that breaks them.
I actually don't see the post as that nuts. He's got a point, some folks just want to get a name on their CV and HR people are shallow enough to value it.
My point in being pedantic is that three language in a corporate setting is based on business English. Companies deal with loads of people from different countries and cultures. However, a self-styled leader and mentor ought to know better as the language used can captivate or put people off.
Just a reminder, don't work for more than 40 hours a week, just to buy more useless shit you don't need.
Another study published in 2015 in The Lancet, involving more than 600,000 employees, found that those who worked more than 55 hours per week had a 13% greater risk of heart attackand were 33% more likely to experience a stroke than those who worked 35 to 40 hours on a weekly basis.
Is the meta employee saying it’s only cruel now that theyve been laid off? I mean i know meta is bad, but i feel like an employee that only says this bc they were fired is on brand for someone that works for meta.