Researchers have designed a single-photon time-of-flight LiDAR system that can acquire a high-resolution 3D image of an object or scene up to 1 kilometer away. The new system could help enhance security, monitoring, and remote sensing by enabling detailed imaging even in challenging environmental co...
Hello sir, I'm an not from the government and would like to show you something off in the distance for about 3 seconds if you will. Step forward where I've carefully marked the street with blue painter's tape. Do not smile. Did you see it? No? Good!. Well what it is, its ah... Don't worry about it. Good day sir. What are you talking about? I asked you to step where? I did no such thing. I'm just a normal person living in the city.
Hey YouTube, today we're testing this photon detector I found browsing ebay that was sold by some friendly russians. It's been collecting dust for 10 years but due to some recent developments it's as relevant as ever! Now I'll be able to see the feds coming from miles away!
Well, not to side with the fascist shithead, but you know, "broken clock...". The thing is, camera vision is kinda enough... It's an entirely different thing if it could be better, improved, safer, or whatever by adding LiDAR or other tech...
Modern tech makes it hard for me to take science fiction seriously anymore that involves humans piloting space fighters, manually aiming weapons, or even being effective on battlefields. We're rapidly reaching a point where warfare will be strictly in the realm of machines.
The ones talked about in the article I linked collect about 50 points per square meter at a horizontal resolution of about 23 cm. Obviously that's way worse than what's presented in the phys.org article, but that's also measuring from 3km away while covering an area of 700 square km per hour (because these systems are used for wide area terrain scanning from airplanes). With the way LiDAR works the system in the phys.org article could be scanning with a very narrow beam to get way more datapoints per square meter.
Now, this doesn't mean that the system is useless crap or whatever. It could be that the superconducting nanowire sensor they're using lets them measure the arrival time much more precisely than normal LiDAR systems, which would give them much better depth resolution. Or it could be that the sensor has much less noise (false photon detections) than the commonly used avalanche diodes. I didn't read the actual paper, and honestly I don't know enough about LiDAR and photon detectors to really be able to compare those stats.
But I do know enough to say that the range and single-photon capability of this system aren't really the special parts of it, if it's special at all.
I love LiDAR, there was very limited terrain data from LiDAR available on USGS about a decade ago, just a couple of counties was all, but it was so detailed you could see the shape of Cars on the streets with it.