The huge stakes in a new Supreme Court case about pornography
The huge stakes in a new Supreme Court case about pornography
www.vox.com
The huge stakes in a new Supreme Court case about pornography
19 comments
-
once again the party of "gun control laws only hurt law abiding citizens" pushing bullshit laws that will a) do absolutely fucking nothing to stop kids from getting porn; and b) only put law abiding citizens at risk, AND even if you don't consume porn whatsoever, do you really think your 13 yr old son isn't crafty enough to scan and upload your ID to every shady 3rd party "age verification" site in existence?
the actual objective is of course to make all porn (defined as whatever the fuck they decide to call "porn," as they already do with books that include gay characters) completely illegal, which is just a step in the direction of ending freedom of speech
once they're done with porn, it'll next be a crime to say anything critical of the GOP, the country, or trumpistan regime
-
Yes, thats what is needed. Push the creators of porn into the unregulated shadows. This is Just the way to protect innocent girls. Make them all outlaws!
Jesus fucking christ
-
Where there are humans, there is porn. This is stupid, virtue-signaling ass bullshit. You cannot stem the flow of the porn unless you take away every form of independent creative expression, stand between every single two humans communicating, and...
Ah, yes. Republicans. Authoritarianism at its dumbest. My guess is it's for leverage to further justify the need for a police state.
-
The irony of 'elected' politicians virtue signaling in the first place
-
-
If everyone had pornography, everyone would be safer.
see: guns.
-
The only way to stop a bad guy with a hard on is with a good guy with a hard on.
-
Pussies don't like dicks, because pussies get fucked by dicks. But dicks also fuck assholes: assholes that just want to shit on everything.
-
-
Thinking about how things have changed over the last century. And also about the differences between US states and between countries like Sweden, or Iran. That's probably true. Especially for women, and LGB, and most especially TQ individuals.
Why make it a joke?
-
-
Fuck the GOP. That is all I have to say on that.
-
Ironic that we're talking about banning porn with a literal sex offender about to take the highest office in our nation...
More than that, the asshole was in a porn video!
-
can’t wait to see what the Supreme Legislators decide this time
-
Free speech, free speech, free speech!!!!!! *
- Only the speech that I like, tho
-
LOL! The GOP is coming for your tits!
Now we need AI tits!
AI devs, if you're listening, could you please have one where you can choose side view spitroast.
I'm so sorry for you guys and gals doing our porn. I hope you guys get better treatment somewhere.
-
Now we need AI tits!
actually that's kinda a thing, Ai uncensor-ers (is that a word?) exist already. For content from countries where censoring is legally required
it's creepy af though and tbh I'm kinda iffy on the ethics of it.
-
19 comments