The US is ranked 132 out of 163 for safety worldwide. I'd say that actually makes the US one of the least safe countries on earth.
Is it safer than living in a Roman frontier town during the Hun invasion? Probably... but the point is, clearly having the most militarized police and highest prison population doesn't make things safer.
I've literally never had anybody in my life experience multiple riots, lock downs due to a crazed gunman shooting up his black neighbor and people crashing, burning and dieing in their yard probably due to drunk driving EVER, until I made some American friends. Visiting them was also a trip, fuck they're paranoid, and honestly I'm not even surprised. You people have police officers stationed at SCHOOLS for crying out loud, how more fucked can it get?!? If I was forced to live in the states I'd also go fucking crazy.
Why would I investigate my employer? A healthy chunk of that $15B in CEO salary works its way back into the hands of officers via lobbying for increased pay/benefits, kickbacks to police unions and sheriff's society's, and direct hiring for police "consultants" and overpaid rent-a-cops.
If burglars want to enjoy these benefits, they need to get back to the old school way of doing business. Get. Mobbed. Up. You didn't see Irish cops bothering the American wing of the IRA or Italian cops hassling the mafia. Burglars need to do the same thing as the rest of the working class and get organized. One stick is easily broken. A bundle is far sturdier.
The Standard and Poor's 500 is ~500 of the largest companies in the country that are publicly traded. It does not include the vast majority of CEO positions in the US, just the biggest.
The source looks like https://linktr.ee/massesutd though the dude doesn't appear to have a website, just links to a bunch of gated websites that I can't access without an account.
If robbers only earn $7500 a year why on earth do they do it? Why would anyone risk arrest, jail time, criminal record, maybe even being shot by armed security or police, for such a paltry amount of money?
Oh, because of the primary driver of most kinds of crime:
Poverty.
If you want to lower crime, you lower poverty, you put social safety nets in place.
Does this solve crime 100%?
No, but its something like one hundred to ten thousand times more cost effective than not doing that and increasing policing instead.
... America is a country where homeless people routinely commit bank robberies with unloaded guns and then surrender to police ... because at least then they get some level of permanent shelter, food, and health care.
You'll notice that organized crime (ya know, as a metric of success) doesn't usually rely on robberies as their source of income. Robberies are risky and stupid.
Ah yes, let's try and justify one crime by comparing it to another one, conveniently ignoring the fact that neither are victimless. And I don't even mean the material cost, I mean the fact that the trauma of being robbed can affect a person for life.
Here's a thought, how about trying to make everything black and white we can decide that multiple things can be bad, even in different amounts?
who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom...
You're not fooling anyone. We know exactly who you are.
Honestly it seems the entirety of lemmy is just political extremists that will down vote any opinion that isn't in their ball park and only care about political talking points. I swear I miss reddit where I could have a feed of interesting stuff where I could scroll for 5 minutes in the toilet without seeing shit like this.
This kind of shit is why lemmy doesn't gather mass adoption