Skip Navigation
133 comments
  • Tips are bullshit and workers should be required to paid a living wage.

    • and now the employee's are going to be asking for more tips instead of wage, so they pay less tax.

      You think everyone one asking for a tip at the cashier is bad now?

      Wait till they put this in.

      • You think everyone one asking for a tip at the cashier is bad now?

        Yeah, this will just make it even more prevalent for sure.

        I think the proliferation of tips at almost every register instead of being limited to full service has been bad since the trend started.

        In my state restaurants pay the federal tipped minimum of just over 2 dollars an hour. Their entire income is based on tips, and until they are required to be paid a living wage, tips are a necessary evil. I tip them well because I know they are getting screwed on their paychecks more than any other job.

        Keep in mind that cash tips tend to not be taxed, which means less going into social security, medicare/medicaid, and other government services. It is still income! But when it was mostly cash it was effectively tax free.

        Now that cards are prevalent it is getting taxed, and this 'no tax on tips' bullshit instead of requiring a living wage just benefits business. It is a counterproductive 'fix' and fuck tipping culture altogether.

        You know what the worst outcome of non-taxed tips will be? The fucking wealthy tipping each other tax free to move money around. That is what it will end up being in a couple decades because that is consistent with every other similar 'fix' that just avoids requiring a living wage.

    • In Oregon, even tipped workers make the state minimum wage, but what that wage is varies depending on location.

      Portland metro has the highest, it just went up on 7/1 to $15.95.

      Other population centers like Salem, Eugene, Roseburg, Bend, Medford, and tourist spots on the coast have a lower rate of $14.70.

      The rural areas where there are more meth labs and cows than people are at $13.70.

      Map:

      • Good for Oregon. Until a living wage is implemented nationwide it is a problem that needs to be addressed.

      • In Oregon, even tipped workers make the state minimum wage, but what that wage is varies depending on location.

        How is a varying amount depending on where you live a "state minimum wage"?

  • Looks like many haven't read the article before commenting. While both candidates have a proposal about the same topic, the methodology of implementing this seems to differ greatly.

    The reaction in the comments appears to reflect more of the potential outcome of the Trump plan, though the Trump plan seems to mainly be some cobbled together bits of some other Republican proposals.

    From the article, the Harris plan goes along with a minimum wage increase and an income cap so higher wage workers can't collect tax free "tips" in lieu of taxable income.

    I also looked up some implications of elimination of taxed tips and found this article that goes into some numbers and shows how raising the standard deduction to make more workers, not just tipped workers, exempt from income tax and benefit many more people. I thought that was interesting and provided more seemingly useful info than either candidates' campaign promises.

    • The solution would be to increase the lowest tax bracket then.

      • That's another fine suggestion.

        The numbers didn't really look in line for today's incomes, and from what I can tell from this, tax brackets for anything but the highest earners haven't changed other than an inflation adjustment since the 80s.

    • So the title is misleading?

      • It's just a title, it says what the article is about, but it can't say everything. But when everyone comments based on the title and not the article, we risk creating misinformation.

        Trump and Harris can both say we should not tax tips, but if that's the end of the story from Trump, but it's part of a multi-pronged approach, that's what we need to be sharing and commenting on.

        Everyone's points about tipped jobs being exploitative are correct, but that isn't what the article is about. If we just take it as Harris and Trump both want to do the same thing, that's a half truth, and that is what many of these comments perpetuate. Both sides or this are not the same, and it does a disservice to us all to treat it as such.

        Having a more descriptive title can help, like if it said "Harris presents competing plan for removing tax on tips," but it is somewhat redundant as they wrote the entire rest of the article about it. I feel this is why we include the article with the post, and not just the title, no? 😉

        I feel I'm sounding a bit harsh, which isn't my intent, but it irks me when I can go through a comment section and see just about everyone has missed the point.

133 comments