Elon Musk haters vandalized dozens of Tesla Cybertrucks by spray painting "F**K ELON" on dozens of them
Elon Musk haters have vandalized dozens of Tesla Cybertrucks being held ahead of delivery at a parking lot in Florida....
tesla is not elon
But they pay him tens on millions as a bonus for being an idiot
Edit: yeah it’s billions. The amount of money they waste on this removed is incomprehensible.
Billions. They paid him the same amount of money (as a bonus!) as Bill Gates had in total when he was the worlds richest person in 2007.
...tens of
millionsbillions...
FTFY
Tens of millions is drastically understating tens of billions.
The difference is literally tens of billions.
Calling him a "removed" is frankly insulting to people who perform the act of sucking cock. Musk is way too selfish to perform the generous and loving act that is fellatio.
after paying him tens of millions, they did it again a thousand more times because thousands of tens of millions is billions. tens of thousands of millions of dollars. It's an insane amount of money.
They missed a trick by using paint, when a spray of salt water would have done the job at one more subtly and more permanently
Subtle wasn’t the intent here. But I do like your thought process here.
while at the same time by-design cloaking it as pure bad quality could actually cause way more longterm damage than a little bit of paint.
on the other hand the paint could also be just a marketing strategy depending on what they smoked to get new ideas
Spraywatering with salt
This is dumb. Sure Elon Musk is a dickhead. And sure Cybertruck is a dumb vehicle that only dickheads would want to have.
But I'd rather the dickheads be driving a Cybertruck than some other massive vehicle that runs on fossil fuels.
All private cars, regardless of the fuel source, are climate disasters.
Giant metal boxes with 1.2 people on average
@SpaceCowboy @return2ozma 60% of Tesla's profits come from the sale of carbon credits, which enable other massive vehicles that run on fossil fuels to be built. E-cars are not about "saving the planet" they are pure Greenwash which is saving the motor industry.
That's more of a problem with how carbon credits are being regulated. Sure Tesla are being assholes for doing this, but it's a corporation, I don't expect them to be good guys.
But none of that changes the fact that some meathead buying a Cybertruck instead of the equivalent fossil fuel monstrosity is reducing CO2 emissions in a direct way. Spray paint the sign a Tesla corporate HQ, don't damage a vehicle which will only have the result of someone driving a fossil fuel vehicle a little longer while the damage is being fixed.
No way, that is positively enormous.
Even carbon credit companies that do their best aren’t always (are often?) not great. e.g. trees may be planted, but:
It seems like there is some progress with that technology that… throws gravel onto beaches or something, to be broken down by waves. Really hope it’s not total BS.
Tesla is synonymous with climate destruction and if you believe otherwise demonstrates that you have grossly bought into their propaganda.
I agree wholeheartedly
Ironically making them more corrosion resistant, by doing so....
Thats actually a better name for them than cybertruck. The Fuckelon
F.Elon.
Without justifying this really dumb act, because there’s no justifying it, [...]
How about we just don’t vandalize private property. That’s a good standpoint to build on.
Wow, how unbased can an article get?
Why bother trying to make something uglier that is already maximum ugly?
@return2ozma Older Tesla's one can give the owner the benefit of the doubt that they purchased it before Elon showed his true colours. No Cybertruck owner has that defence.
They are lucky it's just paint.
I'm sure paint comes off 'stainless' steel real easy....
“Yes Mr. Crowler we hear what you’re saying, but unfortunately spray paint voids your warranty.”
Don't worry, for others they say turning it on voids warranty
Oh did you turn yours on?? Because that's definitely a paddlin'!
Good. Fuck that fascist and his companies. The only sad part of this story is that they used paint and not something that would etch or scratch the stainless.
The truck is not really washable. They will absolutely fuck it up cleaning that out. It can't even resist rain.
You're suppose to use gasoline or kerosene to clean stainless steel cars. At least the Deloreans came with instructions on how to do it. Not sure if Tesla saw fit to mention that.
If I was a good capitalist, I would release a line of spray paints containing a concentrated, strong acid so they would corrode the metal, leaving a mark after the paint was removed. Call it something stupid like "Muskoleum," "RustEloneum," or "Cybertruck Repair Spray"," but preferably something catchier.
Elon sucks, but vandalizing someone else's property because of him isn't cool.
Elon Musk haters have vandalized dozens of Tesla Cybertrucks being held ahead of delivery at a parking lot in Florida.
Literally the first sentence of the article. The owner isn't going to take this loss. Tesla will.
Those owners are only going to have them for about 4 hours after delivery when the truck will die for a multitude of reasons anyway!
I don't know. Vandalizing luxury cars finds me morally indifferent. I'm not going to argue for vandalizing them but I simply can't get myself to care enough for the poor souls whose "cybetrucks" need a new paint job.
Anybody who buys one of those vehicles is someone who sucks also. Fuck em all.
vandalizing cybertrucks is cool and good loser
The problem is having a clown as a CEO for a brand that keeps making people hate him in a very PR visible way. Other car brands don't get graffiti'd.
Vandalizing the environment isn’t either.
Yet here you are posting on the internet using all those vandalizing products right?
F_Elon is probably is future username
That's an idea 🤔
how many?
DOZENS!
Sure, that's how many cybertrucks were vandalized, but how many were spray painted on?
All 12 Cybertrucks that were purchased.
Scores and scores
Made them more valuable.
They should have aimed at the non-stainless steel portion. Pretty sure you could wipe this up easy with some acetone or gasoline as a solvent.
I wonder if it was done to dozens of them
I forgot how cancerous this site was. This place is such an echo chamber that the users are actually defending crimes
@Gorilladrums21 @return2ozma legality does not define morality.
the real crime here is this death trap being allowed on the road in the first place.
It must be, you keep making comments on it.
Just the other day I threw a brick into a car window that had a Z sticker on it. Sue me.
This is why the planet is fucked, you all whine that climate change is scary but then you cheer on people attacking electric cars just because Twitter man bad. You're all desperate for tesla to fail because Elon upset you, someone doing something petty that'll have zero effect on Elon but will negatively affect a regular person fills you with joy because it's a way of hitting back at the bad man. Totally childish and pathetic.
Spend that energy learning about and praising positive things, don't win by tearing your opponent down win by building yourself up.
All of the vehicles in the article were pre-delivery. As they were still owned by Tesla, it falls on the company to repair them.
I’m not justifying vandalism, but the impact to the buyer is a delayed delivery vs a monetary and PR impact to Tesla.
Ok... I'll take the bait, can you please share links that show how the Cybertruck is actually good the planet? I didn't actually read technical review about it. I mostly see silly (and sometimes fun) memes. I also recently read that EV in generals don't have the same impact as electrical bikes, e.g https://www.theguardian.com/news/ng-interactive/2024/apr/11/evs-are-booming-but-electric-bikes-are-really-cutting-emissions , but maybe I'm misinformed and this vehicle by Tesla, despite its size, it's actually helping. Can you please share a link to such review and/or studies with e.g Life cycle assessment (LCA) / ISO 14040?
PS: to clarify I don't mean articles about how it's "changing mind", I mean numerical estimations then comparison between one mean of transport, e.g non EV vs EV, or this EV vs other or this EV vs random electric bike.
Its paint. They can still drive them. Stop being a little baby.
Also, i don't know about a single nice person that bought this low poly piece of shit.
Tesla is synonymous with climate destruction and if you believe otherwise demonstrates that you have grossly bought into their propaganda.
You ... are aware Tesla isn't the only EV car company, and is also one of the more expensive ones ... right?
No matter what cars will be shit for the environment in some way, things like pubic transport, bike infrastructure and more walkable cities are things that actually help