Skip Navigation
96 comments
  • Even better is when they destroy a bunch of virgin land to make a course when courses are already overbuilt in the area, then close it.

    I lived in a city that had a mayor who was elected to a few terms and was going on 10-11 years in office. An out-of-state developer wanted to turn 400 acres of old growth forest by Lake Superior into a golf course, spending about 25 million. For some reason he made this basically the only thing he tried to get to happen in his last 2 years in office. This was also at a time when a lot of courses were struggling or closing because they had built too many in the early 2000s.

    Many people were opposed to it but the usual sort of people thought it was great because 'wow someone is spending money'. One fairly dim guy I knew who worked in construction said "YEAH. Do you know how many jobs that will make??". The problem is they were going to hire a bunch of people to build it, which would take about 6 months, and then the permanent positions at the course were going to be like 6 people. Finally, they didn't do it, the mayor left office, and basically nobody ever talked about it again.

  • I played golf for the first time recently, it's not as boring as it looks... basically a fun way to be outside with friends and do something challenging.

    The course I played on maintained the local geography and incorporated it into its holes. That made for a gorgeous landscape, and, as an example, one hole required a shot over a forested ravine, both a tricky shot, and a nice way to keep the natural landscape, flora, and fauna as intact as possible.

    I confirmed that they only use non-drinkable water for irrigation, and there were no vast spans of grass, only patches that used to be empty land beforehand. That only made the course more challenging.

    All in all, what I'm trying to say is that this sport can be done in a way that's overall fine. Sure, replacing native flora with grass isn't good but it's ok if done in small patches and responsibly. Golf has become a symbol of classism but it's something anyone can enjoy if they have access to it, it isn't even particularly expensive. It isn't great but, done morally, isn't bad either.

    And there is a risk in making it a symbol in that way: it makes for a wrong target and a waste of resources. Activists filling up holes makes a point but there's much more important stuff to do. If you're an environmentalist or an urbanist, cars and oil companies should be pretty much your only concern; golf courses can be dealt with later.

    • Golf courses actually see pretty frequent use; anybody who has played a public course on the weekend knows what it's like to be constantly waiting to take your shot because the group in front of you is still putting, and the group behind is waiting to take their tee shot.

      A much bigger waste of resources and land are the sterile suburban yards that barely get used at all.

      I do wonder how much fertilizer runoff, herbicide use, etc the average golf course is responsible for

    • only patches that used to be empty land beforehand

      There's no such thing as empty land, it used to be a complex ecosystem

  • I fucking hate golf, and golf courses for this reason, HOWEVER they do make a somewhat useful end land use in reclaimed landscapes in urban areas (closed landfills for instance). I don't get the need for greens etc. the original game started out on some Scottish moorland or glen, with native grasses.

    • I'm more concerned about how much water they waste. The sprinklers go off on the golf courses here even when it rains.

  • Just gonna say that golf is fun but I never played the real thing since it's expensive, just golf videogames, minigolf is the one that I think it's boring.

  • This is just someone hating golf lol

    At least in my country every city, no matter how small, have some public football pitch. And almost every neighborhood have some mini pitch. I have no data, but I'm pretty sure that football sums way more area around the globe than golf.

    Which makes sense since football is fun af

96 comments