1y ago

AI Art

147 comments

common furry L
- Furries are like one of the main customers of artists
  
  they are also one of the main driving forces of custom trained generative image models tho.
  
  Furries are one of the main customers of mental illness
- Takes out popcorn from the microwave

The greatest DYKWIA I've ever seen
- Don't you know what I am
  
  Did You Keelhaul Will I Am?

This burn is far too much for the likes of Neosporin. This Atsuhiko needs a hospital.

WHOA! I used to post in a forum with Jessie over 20 years ago. I didn't know she worked on Invincible! That's awesome.

Destroyed in seconds.

Abominable Intelligence

But isn't the reply is right?
What's the relation between using other people art and the user credentials? Should the AI art okay as long as the one published it already has good credentials?
- Public education has gone down hill. Reading comprehension is at an all time low
  
  sorry, meme recognition wasn't taught in here
- This isn't about "good credentials", the person making the post was actually an animator for Invincible (where the image is from).
  So it's the artist posting a meme with their own art from a series, someone accusing them of stealing the art (saying they are as bad as AI) while the artist was actually part of the team that made the series. What is there not to get?
  
  And aside, memes are memes, that specific image conveys a concept in a way that another, custom made, image wouldn't.
  
  I had no idea until you explained it. I'm not familiar with any of that content. So thank you.
  
  That the image is from anime called Invincible, sorry not knowing that
  
  Invincible (where the image is from).
  Are we all expected to just know that?
- When the "good credentials" are "drew the art"...
- The original poster (Jessie Lam) worked on Invincible as an animator, so they did use their own art for that meme, which is a screenshot from Invincible.
  
  On the other hand... animators usually sell their work to the studio... so "technically" it is no longer "theirs", they have no right to use a copy without the studio's permission... 🤷
  
  Yet the original characters Invincible and Omni-man were created by Robert Kirkman, who did not illustrate the original comicbooks (I think). Man, this thing goes deeeep.

Did that person draw that specific frame all by themselves? If no then it's still using others' copyrighted work + own input.
- It's absolutely incredible that people are such bootlickers for billionaire projects that they'll see this tremendous slam dunk and then go to the comments trying to defend the person who just got dunked. Like, seriously, you really think that's going to convince people?!
  
  Yeah the ball went in the hoop, but this is also essentially trashing the entirety of meme and edit culture.
  
  Funny how Luddite paint pigs were perfectly fine when Microsoft's dalle was the only player in the game and didn't start screeching about ai until after open source image generation software got released. And yet you conservatives still call people bootlickers.
- They also were inspired by other creations. Like Superman's strength and flight ability.
  
  Everything is inspired by something.
  
  The only true artist is Ooonga Baloonga, who invented art when he drew something roughly resembling an animal on a random cave wall 6 bajillion years ago. Everything since then is derivative bullshit, lifeless imitations of his unique vision.
  
  That's the point. It's supposed to be a facsimile of s man. The whole plot of the show is a critique of comic book tropes and the consequences of idolizing superheroes etc
  
  Exactly. It's like Elon pointing at a SpaceX rocket and saying that he made it.

147 comments