1y ago

AI Art

You're viewing a single thread.

147 comments

Did that person draw that specific frame all by themselves? If no then it's still using others' copyrighted work + own input.
- It's absolutely incredible that people are such bootlickers for billionaire projects that they'll see this tremendous slam dunk and then go to the comments trying to defend the person who just got dunked. Like, seriously, you really think that's going to convince people?!
  
  Yeah the ball went in the hoop, but this is also essentially trashing the entirety of meme and edit culture.
  
  Funny how Luddite paint pigs were perfectly fine when Microsoft's dalle was the only player in the game and didn't start screeching about ai until after open source image generation software got released. And yet you conservatives still call people bootlickers.
  
  What the fuck are you talking about?
  
  I'm probably more liberal than you, and you're a moron.
- They also were inspired by other creations. Like Superman's strength and flight ability.
  
  Everything is inspired by something.
  
  It shouldn't be. That'd stealing work from others and I doubt most are paying the original artist
  
  So what you’re tell me all artists in history should be sending residuals to the first caveman to draw on a wall?
  You know what, sure, let’s go with that. Maybe copyright enforcement is the way to discovering time travel in this reality.
  
  I will issue you a challenge: create art inspired by absolutely nothing and 100% orginal.
  
  Why would I agree to a challenge that I know is impossible?
  I thought the implications of my sarcastic comment about the first cave painting was that there is no 100% original or inspiration-free work of art at this point in human history. However, there is a difference between plagiarism and transformative work.
  Dante’s Inferno is based off the Bible. Does that mean Dante should have given all credit and proceeds of his sales to the Church? Jesus? God? That’s what my cave painting joke was trying to highlight.
  
  Dude, I'm sorry.
  I wasn't drunk or hungover yet posted a reply to the wrong person. That was meant for the touching grass user.
  I totally agree with you.
  
  Don't be silly, residuals only last until 70 years after the artist's death... that caveman died thousands of years ago. /s
  
  Absolutely. If you create a piece of art. Its precious and anyone who ever looked at that piece owes the artist something. This debt should be paid for life and beyond for all time. End of story
  
  You're delusional.
  
  That's sarcasm, right? It's hard to tell some days
  
  Rule of thumb: no "/s", no sarcasm.
  
  You sound like someone who cannot or does not make art.
  
  I'm demanding eternal payments for shit nobody wanted while putting it out on every platform to market it like an ebusker
  What's the point of shared open spaces if I cant monetize them and take everyone else's shit down with DMCA claims.
  I'm 100% artist baby
  
  Okay, so you've confirmed it.
  Sorry you can't make art. Some day you'll find joy. But not today because you sound like a miserable cunt, but someday surely.
  
  Yes artists are miserable cunts.
  
  You're an idiot.
  
  Don't worry. I can understand sarcasm without markdown.
  
  Bruh
  
  The only true artist is Ooonga Baloonga, who invented art when he drew something roughly resembling an animal on a random cave wall 6 bajillion years ago. Everything since then is derivative bullshit, lifeless imitations of his unique vision.
  
  I bet the first painting wasn't of an animal, it was probably ~~porn~~ a fertility deity.
  
  That's the argument they're making against people who think LLMs are inherently theft.
  
  Nope, I think you should try to listen again.
  
  That's the point. It's supposed to be a facsimile of s man. The whole plot of the show is a critique of comic book tropes and the consequences of idolizing superheroes etc
  
  Exactly. It's like Elon pointing at a SpaceX rocket and saying that he made it.

147 comments