Yeah, “What Killed Capitalism” is an attention-getting subtitle, but I’m pretty sure Wall Street still exists… and will continue to exist for quite a while.
Clickbait doesn't bother me as much as it used to. If I watch or read it and it does not have substance then yes, I will be more cautious on reading/watching whatever they put in the future.
False premise, not sure I could agree with you on that, but to each their own.
False premise, not sure I could agree with you on that
I must have missed how the capitalist society I live in is already dead... Or else Yanis' missed that bailout he failed to prevent.
He is basically just complaining because capitalism in reality doesn't exist the way he thinks it should in his head, and so he wants us all to support a capitalism that will never accomplish the goals he believes it will.
If I watch or read it and it does not have substance then yes, I will be more cautious on reading/watching whatever they put in the future.
I've actually fallen for his rage bait before and read some of Yani's other work on the subject, and that was pretty much the impression I got: reactionary apologetics without substance. He's clearly read Marxist works, I'll give him that, but he wields the language to self-defeating liberal ends (and indeed he is quite wealthy and I supports a SocDem agenda). In fact self-defeating is a great summary of his career, imo. It's unsurprising to me that he failed as a politician - I only wonder what would have happened if someone more effective had been in his position. He also got played by Merkel while in office, and must have realized it because eventually his post-office writings come at her with a vengeance that betrays him.
So yeah, I see a clickbait title, and I'm going to avoid it unless I here solid recommendations from elsewhere. I learned that lesson through experience. I will never be able to read everything that I want to so I don't like wasting time on books that wave red flags right on their cover.
Not really. Like I have read books about economical systems and the like but the writing is usually quite dry and uninteresting, I can usually get through it if the subject is interesting enough to me but not commonly. Not even close to as bad as the time someone recommended I read something by Immanuel Kant, i haven't even attempted to read philosophy since, that guy should have gotten someone else to write down his ideas.
For me, I'll generally find the theses and arguments of books like this interesting so I'll try to read them. In the end, I could have gotten as much out of the books if they had been 90% shorter and I'll quit less than halfway through