Skip Navigation

[Discussion] Should we defederate exploding-heads.com? (Closing arguments)

Exploding-heads.com is another instance on Lemmy where alt-right MAGA types tend to reside. Some people on this server want us to defederate from them immediately, some people want to save defederation as a last resort. They have 104 active users (more stats below).

It seems that exploding-heads has also experienced a recent botswarm invasion. This is obviously another point in favor of defederating them, assuming you are worried about botswarms, which is currently being discussed here.

My advice to you all is please try to discuss this in a civil manner, we need not allow them to create divisive conflict inside our communities. No matter how the vote turns out, you're not going to be able to defederate from your fellow sh.itheads so be nice.

I've linked many of the previous discussions below so people who are out of the loop can get a general sense of the situation.

https://sh.itjust.works/post/216888 https://sh.itjust.works/post/225714 https://sh.itjust.works/post/281126 https://sh.itjust.works/post/410325

Lemmy.world just recently defederated them.

https://lemmy.world/post/747912

https://lemmy.world/post/577526

Although this could be considered a point in favor of defederation, it actually means even if we vote to remain federated, people have a great alternative in lemmy.world where they can still participate in our communities and simultaneously be protected from exploding-heads.

Ensuring diversity of servers is beneficial to the platform as a whole, but it is also not our responsibility to bear that burden.

TLDR, just wrap up any last points in this thread before we open the vote tomorrow. Please be civil.

EDIT: To clarify, this isn't the official vote, this is the final discussion. The vote thread will be posted tomorrow and you will only be allowed to make a single comment saying Aye or Nay.

EDIT2: Vote thread is up, this thread is now locked. Very lively discussion thread sh.itheads. Please try to be more respectful next time.

461 comments
  • For me this is an easy aye. We already defederate from Lemmygrad for tankyism. I don't see an issue with that, as that often comes with denying genocide and generally being apologetic of leaders of the past who have legislated against and killed minorities.

    I don't see how a right-wing instance obsessed with Donald "very fine people on both sides" trump is any better. It simply stands to reason that if Lemmygrad is to remain defederated (and I don't see why not) then so should EH.

  • There is no way to debate these people who have no concept of reality. They do not argue in good faith, so all they do is spread misinformation about vaccines, covid, and free elections, and hate for minorities. I think we should defederate from them.

  • My vote remains to defederate. Their administration are among the worst of the bad actors; to me, that is the primary issue as the admins will determine the shape of the instance. I have already pretty much abandoned this instance though, so take of that what you will. There is, in my opinion, an excessive amount of hand wringing and foot dragging over what should be a pretty easy question. As a consequence we've been flooded with very obvious apologist accounts and their bad faith arguments to protect their friends. I'd like to keep this account active but I'm deeply unimpressed with how this has all been handled and I no longer have much faith that sh.itjust.works is able to prevent itself from becoming a nazi bar.

    In general I think instances this large are a mistake.

    • There is, in my opinion, an excessive amount of hand wringing and foot dragging over what should be a pretty easy question. As a consequence we've been flooded with very obvious apologist accounts and their bad faith arguments to protect their friends

      Completely agree.

      I was initially hesitant. It seemed a bit rushed. I was wrong. I do like this instance, and I do like the possibilities, however we run a very real risk of looking like a safe space for bigotry as long as it's got a veneer of civility.

    • Very well, I understand your perspective. You are obviously a valuable user and I will be sad to see you go if this vote doesn't go your way.

      Nonetheless, I must also be faithful to my own convictions, and I cannot agree that this is an easy decision. The main caveat to your argument is that we outnumber them 25 to 1, and many of us are currently already blocking them, or blocked by them. If they had as much influence on this server as you imply, we wouldn't be having this discussion right now.

      In general I think instances this large are a mistake.

      I would like to discuss this topic at a later date, just out of intellectual curiosity.

      • Understand, it's not that I think exploding heads in specific is the root of all evil. The nazi bar effect isn't the result of one bad actor turning everything bad. It's that sh.itjust.works has demonstrated that it takes well over a week to respond to what appears to be pretty blatant alt-right stuff and a public vote to disavow it, with pretty much admin silence over that week. Where were they? Why choose not to act? More importantly, why not say anything about the choice? This makes it look like a prime place for anyone sympathetic to come around and start astroturfing, and that's what they've done.

        I'd feel much differently if there'd been any kind of explanation of why the first vote on agora was just summarily ignored despite the topic cropping up multiple times per day before and since, but aside from "we need some time to think" buried into comments, I'm not aware of anything. The admins were thinking something, and that is fine, but we weren't given the option to decide if we agreed or disagreed with the reasons for delaying and now rre-voting. I'd call that a bad look any day, but it's a much worse look immediately on the heels of big talk about making the server democratic.

        I'd be happy to talk about why I think large servers are a mistake any time. The explanation is even partly couched in these answers, because I know some of the reasons things are slow is because of the size of the server.

    • obvious apologist accounts and their bad faith arguments to protect their friends

      Ignoring the whole defederation debate this just seem like anti intellectual rhetoric designed to shut down debate because you feel the users aren't valid?

      but I’m deeply unimpressed with how this has all been handled

      You do know that in this instance we vote so stuff so you are just unimpressed with the users not siding with you?

  • I would defederate.

    I see no tangible benefit to associating with them. I don't see an esoteric benefit either.

    If they want to be awful, but in an amplified and coordinated way, then I want no part of it.

    Cancer doesn't need friends or allies.

  • Just a heads up to those walking in to this thread now: this is not a vote.

    Please read the arguments for and against. Please upvote the arguments you find convincing so that they're pushed to the top. Please write a comment if you see a line of argumentation hasn't been explored or hasn't been expressed well in your opinion. This is not the vote. That will come after.

    EDIT: Also, probably should have mentioned: the final vote will be for users of this instance, but the discussion phase is very much open to anybody. Please, if you're from another instance, participate.

  • For what it's worth. I was looking at the server statistics on https://the-federation.info/platform/73 (linked from join-lemmy) and I noticed something. Almost all of the largest lemmy servers have far more comments than posts. The only two notable exceptions are lemmynsfw and exploding heads. They both have far more posts than comments. I'm not sure what it means, but it might be useful to someone in this discussion.

    For example.

    • sh.itjust.works has 5966 posts to 32670 comments
    • exploding heads has 18406 posts to 5503 comments
  • Defederate they are not even a free speech instance. I really don't want to see them talking and making memes about children's gentiles when I sort by new.

  • I'm late to the discussion, but, I'd be a fan of temporary defederation until Lemmy supports users blocking entire instances. I'm not overly big on the idea of defederation in general, I feel like it hurts the fediverse overall. But I don't want to see those asshats either. I keep blocking the communities as they pop up. But it's not really my place to tell everyone else what kind of content they can and can't enjoy.

    And I imagine that even on an instance that leans that way, there are probably still "normal" communities too. If the world's biggest and best "cute cat pictures" community somehow manages to spring up on an instance that also has a Nazi community, what then? If my only interaction with that instance and it's users are through cute cat pictures, and I don't ever know that the guy who posted the cat pic also happens to like swastikas and sucking camel dicks, why should I even care?

    In the real world, unfortunately, the guys who like swastikas and sucking camel dicks also seem to really like telling everyone about it. So keeping them federated still gives them an ability to try to infect others. Because they definitely won't stay in their little box.

    So anyways. It's hard. My preference is to leave it federated for those that want to see it, as long as there's an easy way to block it for those that don't. Since that doesn't exist just yet, I'd be for defederation for exactly as long as it takes for Lemmy to implement instance blocking at a user level. Then open it back up and everyone can make their own choice as they see fit.

  • I vote to defederate. The bot swarm by itself would be enough, but the inability of individual users to block instances means that those of us who do not want to see their garbage do not have another realistic option. If Lemmy ever gives user instance-blocking, then I would reserve defederation to botting and to illegal content and allow people to choose who to associate with on their own.

    • Just block problem users. It isn't hard unless you're a total crybaby who can't handle the slightest bit of dissent crossing your vision

  • I think I will start a larger thread in the main community about what free speech means in the context of a somewhat anonymous internet. My current view is that while I want to promote openness and free speech that can really only work in a context where the person exercising their speech feels some necessity to use it responsibly and in an honest way. On the internet that takes a lot of self control because the social norms of every day life don't always apply because a) no one knows who you are b) there is not a human being right in front of you that you might feel empathy for c) there are no consequences to anything you say d) not all posts are even by humans. With all these taken together there is a compelling argument that speech may need to be more highly regulated on the internet than in face to face interactions. With the present instance we are discussing they may fit the mold as they have bots ( which don't have any right to free speech ) and posts which seem to be more focused on attacking people in bad faith rather than having honest discussion. I think the point I do want to make though is it's not the speech itself that I find that is the problem it's the methods of the speech : bots, and trollish attack posts; that I take issue with. I think that speech where the person is just mistaken, wrong, or I disagree with them should be allowed. I might change my mind on that in the future but that is my current stance.

  • Yeah maybe another vote, people seem very passionate about this now maybe the result will be different. I'm not pro defederating instances but I don't feel that much positive feelings over the dogswill that gets posted in exploding heads. They literally just recreated /pol/ which happens to be the dumbest board on 4chan that most people outside /pol/ hate.

  • @imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works Question for you tangentially related to this: our prior vote on Agora voting being sh.it.heads* only - do we have an official stance on this right now? Seemed like that was the case but it was a pre-mod vote that is not listed in the results record.

    Does have some bearing on how tomorrow will go down.

    *("Sh.itheads" - pfft, splitters. Can't wait until we get this and the defederation policy out of the way so we can vote on the important stuff, like the term sh.it.heads being obviously superior :p)

  • I vote not to defederate.

    I agree with the Chinese Bot Troll on this one. I like open stuff. For me, personally, we've already defederated too much. I don't care enough about EH that it'd matter to me too much, but if it were up to me we wouldn't defederate anything that wasn't either a bot instance or a scam instance. As long as we have enough moderators to keep policy violators away, and we continue to observe, I don't see a reason to defederate. Then again, we've already defederated too much so I'm not too invested in this.

  • Nay, but only slightly. like 51-49

    I like challenging them, and if sh.itjust.works defederates from them, I won't be able to! :(

    • Just because you enjoy the conflict doesn't mean we should subject marginalized user to their vitriol.

      If you want to debate them (which is futile because they always argue in bad faith) you could always do it on their instance.

      By remaining federated their content shows up here and their behavior is effectively condoned by this instance. New users of this instance will see that and could end up moving elsewhere because they don't understand federation yet.

      They also use benign instances to link back to theirs as a recruiting tool which can further radicalize people who may not have known about the community in the first place. Real harm is done when we give fascists an outlet under the guise of free speech.

      The only way for a tolerant society to remain tolerant is to be intolerant of intolerance.

      • I assume you also raise these concerns with lemmy.ml allowing lemmygrad, the much larger hateful community?

        The only way for a tolerant society to remain tolerant is to be intolerant of intolerance.

        And as always, the rest of the quote:

        I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols.

        How can you apply the paradox of intolerance while you deny public opinion by calling to defederate from extremists? As it stands now, EH doesn't ban dissent; I've challenged them multiple times.

  • I think federation should be used as a tool for combatting spam (brigading included) and dealing with instances that allow illegal content or that promote actual violence.

    De-federating is not the tool to use because you don't like seeing the content in your feed, you can block the communities. De-federating isn't the tool to enforce this instances moderation rules on other instance's communities.

    Brigading is certainly a concern and if their users were doing that we would need to reach out to their admin to attempt to resolve the issue. As a last resort we could de-federate to mitigate the problem.

    I'm not at all defending the ideas on EH or the user's posts or comments. There are some truly disgusting opinions being represented there. I just haven't seen them cross the line into allowing violence to be planned, or allowing CSAM or spamming.

    It is very important to understand that de-federation is just a global block list that is enforced on every user on this instance. It is convenient for the users to have spam instances automatically blocked and for the users to not have to worry about CSAM in their feed. Beyond that, if a user wants to read alt-right content then it isn't up to me to tell them that they cannot.

    If you want to block content that is 100% up to you, nobody can tell you who you can block. In exactly the same way you should not attempt to exercise any control over another user's block list.

    De-federation is just a block list. Curate your own block list otherwise let the admins remove spam and obviously illegal stuff. De-federation isn't a super downvote button an we should not use it as such.

461 comments