Movie Review
Movie Review

Movie Review

The problem isn't female leads, it' trash-tier writing. Like introducing a self-conscious stormtrooper and then having him unemotionally kill his mates pretty much immediately. Or introducing a nobody and then make her the child of a somehow™️ returned supervillain. Or having your minor villain and your female lead fall in love and then having them pretty much just revert back to where they were before. Or replacing the Death Star with an intergalactic Death Shotgun. The list goes on
It was lack of common direction through the trilogy. JJ set up his signature mystery boxes in the first movie, only for Rian to ignore those and leave nothing to work with for the next one.
I believe the reason why Palpatine somehow returned was because Rian killed off Snoke, and they really needed some big baddie Kylo and Rey could team up against so Kylo could have his redemption arc.
i much prefer where rian johnson was going, even though the main plot was meh. he left so many open plot threads that tied into the old eu that they could have used, but then jj went back to his first idea.
only for Rian to ignore those and leave nothing to work with for the next one.
JJ choosing to ignore the second movie doesn't mean "nothing was left". Baring the bizarre casino, TLJ was the most interesting SW story since RotS. Episode IX could've been an amazing finale coming out of that, but JJ did what JJ always does and absolutely failed to deliver.
*Also, I feel it's important to point out the "Mystery Box" was and is bullshit, lazy writing. Yes, it's important to leave things in a story for the audience to wonder about and anticipate. That's not a valid excuse to throw esoteric shit at the wall and call it a day. The audience doesn't need to know where the plot is going, but the fucking writer should. JJ left Rian with hollow shell of "intrigue" with nothing substantial, got pissy when Rian did what he wanted with that, then shit out a boring finale trying to reverse everything back.
Bringing back Palatine was always the plan. If you rewatch 7, it's painfully obvious that was the plan. Rian Johnson did the right thing by saying "Fuck that, I'm going to make something not shit", and then making the only noteworthy movie of the trilogy. Did he make mistakes? Yes, the gambling planet was a mistake, but The Last Jedi was the only movie with interesting stories in it at the end of the day. JJ Abrams would have made a worse movie, and a way worse trilogy if he got full creative control.
I believe the reason why Palpatine somehow returned was because Rian killed off Snoke, and they really needed some big baddie Kylo and Rey could team up against so Kylo could have his redemption arc.
I think there's no doubt that's why they had to do that. After TLJ the only thing left is for Rey to fight Kylo Ren (which already happened in TFA) or for Rey and Kylo Ren to kiss (which is lame and stupid). Both of these things happen RoS, and didn't take up much screen time, so what are you gonna do for the other 90+ minutes of screen time?
Also Palpatine denying death fits with the grieving process theme of the movie, it fits with the relationship to the past theme of the trilogy, but the surface level online "reviews" will never discuss that since they are pushing a narrative that there were no themes in the movie. And for whatever reason people act upset about a sequel trilogy having any kind of theme about relationship to the past.
The problem isn’t female leads, it’ trash-tier writing.
Worst part about the sequels was the compulsive need to regurgitate elements of the prior series.
There's so much lore from the books and the games and the toys and the cutting room floor of the original movies. And they had a ton of good ideas at the outset. A storm trooper who defects? A six foot tall super trooper in mirror armor? A Sith Lord who isn't stoic and morose, but hot headed and self-destructive? These are cool good ideas!
Shame they got drowned out in Disney fueled nostalgia.
A thousand times this. People hate bad female actors not because they are female but because they are bad actors.
Kal el no
Sometimes, but more often bad writing can make a great actress look like a bad female actor.
Natalie Portman can act, but those prequels were rough on her reputation. The camp value od the prequels wasn't immediately apparent and it was rough on her.
I remember someone saying that they thought Ewan McGregor and Liam Neesan were great, and the response was 'yeah, in Trainspotting and Schindlers list.'
Some people just hate women and they suck, but often the something with a female lead just sucks. It sucks that the former complicates the latter.
Yeah, I never even noticed "Kal el no" in the movie when I watched it. But it's a meme, so we all have to pile on about something completely forgettable being the worst thing ever!
That's how this shit works. Just short clips about nothing burgers turned into memes and made to loom large in your mind as being something egregious.
Or having a beloved character die off screen
Or faking a death and undoing the fakeout within a couple of minutes.
It sucks, yes, but was there a good way to do it otherwise? The movie was in late post-production, about a year from release, and Carrie featured heavily in the end of the movie. It would've required pretty major changes and reshoots to organically insert Leia's death in.
The other problem is that there were 2 death stars in the original trilogy and another one in the sequels. Like, think of something new, will you?
I'm honestly not even mad at that. What broke my immersion was how everyone was just flat out stunned that they would try it a third time, and with no defensive countermeasures whatsoever. They were caught off guard a third time
And that third time they figured out how to bend space lasers to hit every planet at once and auto win
Come on
Sir, another death star has hit the big screens.
Death dildo!
Along with two death stars, of course.
South park has an entire season about this. They basically tried to make the new Star Wars as nostalgic as possible to people who liked the original trilogy.
Wait you mean rebels are gone and the empire too? Let’s do resistance vs first order then. Let’s make a planet that’s almost the same as tatooine. A villain that’s almost the same as Vader, with a similar ending. And the list goes on. Hell let’s even bring a quick force heal (previously unheard of/impossible) from someone who’s totally untrained. That’ll teach em.
But imo the most frustrating part was when Rey at the end decided that she was a Skywalker. Like, what??? They could have made it end with “Rey who? Just Rey” to mean that we aren’t defined by out family’s actions, but instead she decided she belonged to someone’s family she hardly knows.
Its how they do the female leads. They still have to be "hot," of course. And in order to be "strong?" Well obviously masculinity is the strong gender, and OBVIOUSLY masculinity is toxic. So a "strong female character" is either just toxic masculinity with a pretty face pasted on, or a beige parody of stoicism.
violent genocidal space sow who uses her weapons to intimidate indigenous people enters the chat
Of course female leads isn't a problem.
This post is mocking people like Ben Shapiro, the crtiical drinker, the quartering and other such douchebags who shit on good movies with good writing that are popular among audiences and critics, because "forced diversity, DEI hire, woke, radical feminist agenda."
Why does the Critical Drinker sound like he hasn't taken a shit in a week and needs to make it your problem?
crtiical drinker,
I agree with the vast majority of his critiques, none of those movies are good or have good writing.
And he's the first to point out examples of good female leads like Sarah Connor and Elen Ripley, as well as diversity done right like Arcane.
But hey, if you think most of the shit hollywood's been shitting out in the past decade is good, all the more happiness to you i guess.
Tangentially, he seems to be a right-wing moron when he's not talking about movies though, at least in one instance i saw him defensing poor Charlie Kirk; but i tend to stick to the movie critics and not the hour long open bars so maybe that was a one-off.
Star wars writing was always dogshit, but you fuckers only tie yourself in knots when the woman on the screen has clothes on.
The dialog has ranged from acceptable to dog shit. The plot and story beats are pretty solid. The new movies contradict themselves within the same scene sometimes.
I wouldn't go so far as "dogshit", but I agree that people look at the OT with heavy nostalgia glasses. Watching the movies objectively, the dialogue, story, and particularly the acting are all pretty rough. It's all enjoyable still (I love them myself), but it's far from the masterpiece a lot of people like to hold it up as. In truth, the franchise's best asset was and is the universe around the stories, which does a fantastic job bolstering the less than stellar parts. And, thankfully, even a downright terrible movie won't topple that.
Yep, Star Wars, famous for excessive nudity.
Like introducing a self-conscious stormtrooper and then having him unemotionally kill his mates pretty much immediately.
If you paid attention to the movie, Finn doesn't know how to fly a TIE fighter, because Storm Troopers don't fly TIE fighters. So when Finn is blasting TIE fighters, he's explicitly not killing Storm Troopers. In fact in every military I'm aware of, pilots of expensive fighters are always officers. Who abducted Finn from his family? That would be First Order officers. Who is Finn shooting at? First Order officers. Doubtful it would be the same officers that pressed him into the First Order, but it's easy to understand why he wouldn't all that broken up about it.
Some online review told you the movie is stupid because Finn is shooting at his friends, but if you think about it at all, that is explicitly not true.
Also consider that a Star Wars movie made you think about the morality of killing Storm Troopers. You might even consider thinking about it more and consider how many wars involve killing people not because they are evil, but killing people simply because they are on the other side and will kill you for the same reason. You may find that the answer to that question is it's every war that's like that. That's what a war is: killing people because they're on the other side without any consideration to what kind of person they are. Yeah, wars are a bad thing.
Also consider that Finn was indoctrinated and conditioned to be capable of killing people without hesitation. Consider how many militaries in the real condition people to kill other people without hesitation. How many militaries do you suppose do that?
Do you think that if someone realizes they've been indoctrinated into something, all other indoctrination and conditioning disappears from their brain instantly? Like it's a Saturday morning cartoon and someone gets bonked on the head and suddenly they're a good guy in all things? I think it actually makes more sense that Finn is still conditioned to kill without hesitation than what the internet that says he's supposed to have some moral crisis about killing First Order officers.
So a Star Wars movie made you the morality of killing people in a war. But you stopped yourself from thinking about it too much because the internet told you the movies sucks. Instead of asking questions and thinking about what's happening in a scene in a movie, you didn't think about it because you're defaulting to the answer "because the movie sucks". And this is how the internet ruins movies for people, you're not allowing yourself to even consider why things are happening in a movie because you're supposed to answer "because this sucks" and stop all thought.
Or introducing a nobody and then make her the child of a somehow™️ returned supervillain.
It's possible the point of the sequel to explore relationships in the past (shocking!). Something to think about: Why didn't Rey try to bring Palpatine back from the dark side (as Luke did with Vader)? Luke didn't even suggest that she try to do this. Why not? There's seems to be difference between the relationships explored in RoTJ and in RoS. Why is Vader redeemable, but Palpatine isn't? Maybe think on what the difference is.
Or just go along with the internet narrative and turn off your brain, because that's easier.
Mate have you considered that it's possible for people to have different opinions about a movie than you, without them being brainwashed by the internet?
Have you considered that media/art is highly subjective and that even if a movie was internationally adored, it would still be valid for someone to not like the movie, and criticise it?
I'm all for a lively debate over the qualities of certain media, but your main point seems to be 'you just don't like it because you can't think for yourself', which is just a bullshit argument. It feels very similar to "you just don't believe in my god because you haven't prayed enough" or "you just don't like pickles because you can't cook well enough".
This would be a better comic if they chose a franchise that hadn't been enshittified to the nth degree.
Name one
I'm not completely sold, but at this point in time I'd say it'd work better with the new Fallout Show for one.
Bond
It tracks that you don't even know what the word means.
I do know that Cory Doctorow used it specifically to refer to the dynamics of two sided marketplaces. I chose to use it the way it's more commonly used, to refer to the general enshittifying pressures of late stage capitalism, to get my point across.
Are you enshitting me right now?
Star Wars comes to mind immediately.
What's funny is I liked Rey as a character and the first movie was fine, but it quickly went downhill with the next two and I haven't watched any of them since.
But I've probably watched Rogue One about a dozen times so far and it's one of the best modern Star Wars movie we've had.
A crap movie is a crap movie. Just sucks to get tossed in the incel pile because incels hate a specific movie too.
Star Wars comes to mind immediately.
I wonder if that's because the comic is about Star Wars...
and I haven't watched any of them since.
No one has, since they don't exist.
Rogue One may even beat out Empire for me. Sacrilege!
I support you, friend
You need to watch Andor if you haven't already.
It's so flabbergasting that people can see the problems with the new trilogy but still enjoy the hollow shell of a movie that is R1
Rogue one has some of the best drama, acting, and emotion since the original trilogy. If you didn't like rogue one honestly I just wonder if you don't like Star wars. Sequels I get not liking, a lot was wrong there, prequels too a lot wrong, but rogue one was top filmmaking in my book.
Rogue one is one of the most boring movies ever made that ends with one of the greatest action sequences ever made.
Yeah well if you ignore the internet reviews and marketing and take the movies for what they are, TFA was a solid reboot, checked all the boxes. Not exactly groundbreaking but a good return to form and a fun action adventure movie, which is all Star Wars needs to be really.
TLJ was unoriginal, boring, and the most misogynistic movie in Star Wars. But the marketing said it was about strong women so everyone got on their respective hills ready to die based solely on the marketing. No one was going to change their opinion (which is documented on the internet forever) after they actually saw the movie. So we're suppose to pretend that it's good leadership to act like an authoritarian in a Resistance movement (what are they resisting again?) Rey wasn't relegated to a support role (her only actions are distracting tie fighters and moving some rocks around) and Leia hiding in a bunker from her son is what a strong person would do. Let's all pretend that Rey thinking she should try to fix a rapey asshole because he looks good with his shirt off isn't a problematic thing to show to young girls as a positive role model. We all have to pretend the marketing was an accurate representation of the movie forever because we're idiots that can't actually look at what's happening on the movie screen.
RoS is janky, but is actually the most interesting Star Wars movies, mostly because of the challenges placed on it externally. It has some fun action adventure (though very derivative of Raiders of the Lost Ark in the first half). It has interesting themes about relationship with the past, the difference between ancestry and family, the emotional aspects of fascism, and of course the grieving process. Also gives a fairly satisfying ending for Princess Leia, though you have it a lot of leeway on that part (given the circumstances) if you're not an asshole. But the internet is obsessed with "somehow Palpatine returned" memes (which is all about how Poe is supposed to know or care about the specifics of his return, which is actually explained to us the audience) so the narrative is that it's the worst Star Wars movie ever!
Rogue One is studio directed garbage (sorry!) I won't go into details on that one, don't want to ruin it for you.
Outside of the Original Trilogy, the best two Star Wars movies were the ones JJ Abrams made. Other than those two (and Solo) everyone else failed to meet the bar of being fun action adventure. Everything else is trying to pretentious garbage, and I'm sorry but I'm not taking a movie that seriously when it has toys I played with as a kid on the screen. TFA, RoS, and Solo remembered to have some fun, but that's something miserable terminally online people that make youtube videos can't comprehend.
Disney should really just bring back JJ Abrams to make another fun action adventure movie with Rey, Finn, and Poe. People that like Star Wars movies would get another fun Star Wars movie. Youtube content farms would pump out endless videos about how horrible JJ Abrams is. Miserable people would have another reason to go on the internet and complain. Everyone would get what they really want.
I mean the sequels deserve a majority of the criticism they received. They were safe, retreaded what the original trilogy did, and have no lasting cultural impact.
Rouge One always had a female lead and was fantastic. Actually added something into the series in a meaningful way and is beloved by fans.
It took kyle from us.
They could've made Kyle's story an amazing show or trilogy of movies. Watching his growth from cadet to the Jedi who uses dark side powers would've been sweet.
Rogue One is possibly the worst new Star Wars movie... At least RoS was entertaining to make fun of.
Solo is solidly the worst thing Disney has done to star wars. Rogue one is middle of the pack.
Rogue one was the peak
Andor, especially season 2.
Check their she hulk reviews for their baromoter. That was when I lost my patience with Den of Nerds.
I’m a big Maslany fan after Orphan Black but that show wasn’t good. Episodes felt weirdly short and nothing really happened.
Actually watching that for first time right now, on 3rd season. She's so talented on it!
Not the best writing in the MCU, that's for certain. I get it. But I had fun. Lots of world building. The Netflix bridge.. the phase 1 stuff... I'm a memberberries sucker
So we can't admit a bad movie is bad because itnhappens to have a female lead?
Is the reason it's bad because it has a female lead? Not without being a misogynist.
If it's for another reason, sure! Ghostbusters 2016 was shit, but not because it had female leads.
Which was a movie when anyone who criticized it got labeled an incel
This is where these big movie companies are evil geniuses because they make it a point to have these old beloved franchises be remade with women replacing older characters and having them talk about how womanly they are and how shit men are and when people rightfully comment on it being some weird shit, they get called misogynists.
The whole gender and race thing going on within these types of movies are a deliberate distraction to make it impossible to criticize movie companies for making lazy, pandering slop instead of creating something new and worthwhile.
It was worked really well because now all people talk about is identity politics when yet another piece of shit movie is released instead of demanding that the movie companies do their jobs and make good, well told stories with characters people can relate to, not propaganda mouth pieces who have zero character to them other than what they represent in society.
I have actively avoided these movies despite being the target audience for many of them. I just don't care to be pondered to and talked down to like I'm a removed just because I happen to be blessed with boobs and a vomb.
There are plenty of fantastic movies with women in leading roles that are well written and who are facing difficult issues that I would much rather watch than any of the branded slop Disney poops out every year.
Especially the horror genre has a fantastic track record when it comes to interesting and capable female protagonists, but I don't løbe horror because it's a female dominated genre. I love horror because it is one of the only movie genres in this day and age that still tries to make something new, innovative and interesting in movies and the fact that most horror movies are about women, isn't really anything anyone talks about because it isn't what makes the movies interesting. And that really is how diversity should be handled in most movies. Gender, sexuality, color of skin should not be the main attribute of a character because they aren't in real life. Those are just one of many interesting aspects of a person.
I find it to be both unfair and super annoying how the Hollywood industry cultivated this divisive discourse among movie goers for a decade in order to get us to talk about their pos movies, defend or attack them so that they can get their bag, be praised for being forward thinking and ban all negative reviews for "discrimination" when they themselves are the ones creating this environment. They fully know what they are doing. Don't get it twisted. I'm also 99% sure that their movies are money laundering schemes because I don't understand how they can all cost os much money and still come out looking and feeling like bottom of the barrel shit. I have seen Hallmark movies with more ambition than what they produce at Disney.
Ep 7 was ok, but it relied too much on nostalgia. Ep 8 was a clusterfuck of terrible decisions. I didn't watch Ep 9 and I'm happy with that.
I don't even recall which I've seen and not, but I do remember I enjoyed the first ones from the late 70s/early 80s(?) when I was a kid. Then I watched something star wars in the 90s that I felt was meh, then I watched something in the early noughties I felt was even more meh. Full stop since then.
I think the best way to look at SW is "teenage action romance in space, for boys" - easy to be amazed when you're young, harder to swallow when you're older.
Could one issue be that professional writers, on average, give female leads worse scripts to work with? Not always intentionally.
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/MostWritersAreMale
I feel like this is a pattern in Star Wars. Not just with Rey, but Ahsoka and The Acolyte too.
As for why this is a tragedy, I would cite the A/B examples of AC: Odyssey and Cyberpunk 2077 where, given the literally identical gender neutral writing, the women VAs utterly nail their scripts.
I wonder what’d happen if TV got the same treatment.
And cyberpunk shows they can still include unnecessary softcore porn in their stories, regardless of gender. Tv writers love that shit.
Same with a Greek epic. Alexios and Kassandra were identically horny.
Isn't that how Alien was written? Then Signourney Weaver blew them away.
Most writers being male doesn't mean that women have to be terrible characters. Shit writers are just shit, and Disney hasn't bothered with finding quality writers in a very long time.
I have definitely watched shows and movies and have either liked or disliked it only to listen to a podcast that has pointed things out I didn’t realize and has changed my opinion of the content. It’s definitely more common for me to dislike it than end up liking it.
Yeah, sometimes you overlook some elements and once pointed out you can’t unsee it. (My opinion of the book the name of the wind honestly dropped after convincing my partner to read it)
Oof. You gotta be careful sharing things you like with others. It’s hard to not have your opinion changed based on others.
I'm the reverse, where I tend to be forgiving for the most part but little things occasionally bug me about a movie. Then seeing Red Letter Media review of it where they point out that the thing I hated made sense with a little bit of context helps me let a lot of those little things go and enjoy the movie or show.
It is pretty rare that something is mentioned in a review that makes me dislike a movie because either I already noticed it or apparently it wasn't enough to notice before, so why get annoyed now?
It’s definitely rare that I like something less based other people’s opinions.
I think it happens most with tv show recaps. Where I am enjoying a show, then hear a recap where they point things out I never noticed, but in future episodes I can’t stop noticing that an end up thinking less of the show. It’s possible I would have felt that way eventually.
Nobody hates Star Wars more than a Star Wars fan.
The sequels had such a good opportunity but wasted it with over correcting.
I really enjoyed the point in Episode 8 that Rey was unimportant, I thought it could have opened up the whole universe. Instead we had to be angry about everything and the on the nose fan service in Episode 9 went way too far the other direction.
Star wars had a fantastic extended universe from novels, comics and games. They threw it all away to make a trilogy where they didn't even have a complete story. As a fan, it felt like someone swapped my chocolate for cat turds.
To be honest throwing out the Star wars extended universe stuff was a good call. Adopting that mess would have been completely impossible. All the original actors has aged out and replacing them with new actors would have been a big disaster.
But you are right in that they started a new trilogy without any idea where they were going with it. And that's JJ Abrams all over. Him and his stupid mystery box where he invents something without having any idea what the end game for it is. He's literally done this with every property he's touched.
The sequel trilogy was bad. Get over it. You want a good female lead in Star Wars? Look at Old Republic video game.
I don't think it was bad. I think it was on par with 1,2, and 3.
Those were bad also
why you pluralize
I don't know, man. Without watching any reviews or commentaries I could have listed numerous issues with the sequel trilogy right after watching the individual movies. Sure, there were some I missed that only added oil to the fire, but it was still extremely obvious that the movies are horrendous.
Some people, perhaps a good number, do in fact blindly follow influencers' opinions and hate what they hate. This, however, in no capacity affects the fact that those movies are pieces of garbage. Whether you've come to this conclusion yourself, or you learned about it from someone else, the simple fact remains.
There's also another point to consider. Movie reviews and analyses are very common. Name any movie and there's nearly a guarantee that there are at least a few people analyzing their details and posting the findings on YouTube or elsewhere. There's nothing wrong with watching those videos and having them affect your opinion on the movie.
Personally, I've watched many different reviews, critiques and analyses of various movies, including Star Wars. In many cases, my opinion of the movies was improved due to broader context, technical details such as how VFX were made, plot elements I might have missed or other valuable information that may or may not have been obvious to me when first watching. I think this is a perfectly natural phenomenon. You like something, so you dive deeper to learn more, leading to you liking it more or less in the process.
However, in the case of most recent Star Wars movies, there's usually no additional context or details to learn, other than "the director changed 8 times and none of those 8 people knew what they were doing". You wouldn't know that from watching the movie, and personally, I think it's perfectly acceptable to give extra criticism to the company, based on external information.
At the end of the day, it's another corporation ruining what people love and this sole fact is enough to feel angry and spread negative sentiment towards that company. They 100% deserve it. Just make sure to hate the company and not other fans.
I think this is a dumb trope to parrot. Media analysis and critique is valuable artistic output in its own right, and using it to process media that's more complex, or with additional context and research, is a totally valid way to consume and engage with the content. Hell, there are plenty of video essays that I've watched for content that I never watched in the first place, because the analysis was highly entertaining and is much less time consuming than watching an entire several seasons of a TV show or whatever. In some cases that has made me want to go watch the content in its entirety with new appreciation, e.g. House MD.
there are plenty of video essays that I've watched for content that I never watched in the first place, because the analysis was highly entertaining and is much less time consuming
This makes me think of Angela Collier's essay segment "that time I read and enjoyed Ayn Rand", because nobody should ever have to sit through reading Atlas Shrugged.
Recommendations, please!
Red Letter Media are obvious and I would guess they were the channel being referenced, but I'm not sure because they don't do the misogyny angle.
My favorite YT critic is YMS, his output is less frequent these days but I always enjoy his takes even if I don't agree with all of them, and he covers a lot of more artsy and niche movies, including foreign stuff that I wouldn't even hear of otherwise.
Jenny Nicholson is the biggest source of the essays on stuff I'll probably never watch -- her video on The Vampire Diaries, for example, is unhinged and very funny. She also outputs less and less these days, but seemingly largely because her video lengths keep ballooning, her last one was a 4+ hour video about the massive failure of the Star Wars hotel.
Kermode and Mayo's Take Podcast and basically anything written/presented by Mark Kermode.
Rogue One was good though
Best score in the franchise. And that is saying a lot since John Williams did the rest. But that music drives that movie like a madman.
Havent seen anything newer than episode 7, but that one was kinda mid so I didnt even care to watch the newer ones.
Episode 8 had one scene that was really cool to look at ::: spoiler spoiler When they hyperdrived one ship into another ::: But it comes with opening a lot of plot holes and asking questions we were better off ignoring.
Episode 9 is just garbage writing start to finish though. And garbage marketing when you remember they announced ::: spoiler important plot point The return of palpatine ::: through fortnite.
I watched Episode 3, on DVD at an in-law's house, basically to get it over with. And on that day ceased being a fan of Star Wars. And as far as I can tell listening to the rest of you, I haven't missed much.
How dare you insult Mr Plinkett like that
Mr. Plinkett very famously criticized movies in which the only woman of significance in the story had an arc where she went from being a Queen to a Senator to a trad wife to being dead.
But it's wrong to criticize movies that have plot arcs like that for women?
That kind of depends on how it's done.
The media literacy of the general public is surprisingly low. I wouldn’t be shocked if some people actually think like this.
Having your own thoughts is woke
I have bad news - most people think like this. At this point, I don't believe people actually watch the media they consume, even sat right in front of it - They mindless let it pump into their brains, then let other media tell them what emotions they should feel, or (maybe) decide that for themselves based on the fraction of the story they actually processed.
The really bad news is this practice isn't isolated to just fiction.
The Critical Drinker . Jpg
modern awedeeeencessss
The fat nerd on youtube is right about it sucking ass, not because of the female lead tho
I've watched the newer Star Wars movies and honestly? I thought the old ones were like kind of all right, nothing I'm absolutely batshit insane in love with but i hate all the ones that came out under disney. I should watch the shows sometime, I haven't watched any of the newer Star Wars shows
Has enough time passed since Disney marketed TLJ as being about "strong women" that we can now discuss the misogyny present in the works of Rian Johnson?
The plotlines of the male characters in TLJ made sense. The female characters on the other hand, have no cohesive motivation and they only exist to serve the plotlines of the male characters. Well I guess Rey was motivated to "fix" an abusive asshole after seeing him with his shirt off, but seems slightly problematic to me. But after that she's relegated to a support role of distracting TIE fighters and moving rocks around while the men try to accomplish the main objective while trying to overcome the obstacles caused by emotional women. Rey could've easily blown up the laser since she's in the Millenium Falcon, the ship that blew up a Death Star. But that's not a woman's role, so she's on support duty. Leia has to hide in a bunker after being in a coma half the movie so there could be a Poe mutiny plotline. The incompetent woman he mutinied against is disposed of shortly after that plotline came to a pointless end. Done with that one, get rid of her! Holdo's plan involved engineers, but she didn't tell Rose her plan. What was Rose's job again? Rian Johnson apparently forgot. She's a woman she exists solely to be an obstacle for the male characters to overcome. Things only work out when the women learn their place and stay in the bunker or maybe go around back and move some rocks around or whatever. Facing evil is a man's job!
Shouldn't be that shocking since it was made by the guy who made Looper, where he fridges Bruce Willis's wife so hard that it breaks the whole premise of the movie. Like the whole premise is that in the future, the mafia can't murder people because future CSI catches them every time. But how can Rian Johnson give the male character motivation if according to the premise of the movie, they can't murder his wife in front of him? Ah well, fuck the premise, fridge the wife. It's a Rian Johnson movie so no one will question it I guess?
Why does no one talk about this?
Are we still believing the marketing Disney did to compensate for the rampant misogyny inherent in Rian Johnson's writing?
Going to disagree with the foundation, the motivation of the male characters didn't make sense either. Luke Skywalker, who found the good in his own father who was a genocidal maniac, considered murdering his nephew in his sleep. Dumbest thing I've ever seen. Then was so sad about it that he abandoned the galaxy. Yeah that sounds like a thorough understanding of Luke Fuckin Skywalker. Rian Johnson was a moron making that trash.
Yeah, it is true Luke isn't Luke. But he's kinda a side character... which sucks, because it's Luke fucking Skywalker and he never even left that fucking island. But Poe and Finn's motivations make sense. Not that their plotlines were or meaningful, or original, or even interesting. But they're the only characters where I wasn't constantly thinking "why the hell are they doing that?"
Is all you need to know about this post lol
is it okay you can reupload the photo?
On RT, the TV show Pluribus has a critic score of 98%, and an audience score of 69%, so maybe the The Onion's joke about how Breaking Bad fans are not going to like it had something to it.
I have a friend that thinks this exact way he is a big nerd of all things, superhero video games, etc. but he will not form his own opinion until Kevin Smith says something about it on his YouTube channel.
What are apostrophes expensive now?
They cost the same as a comma to go between "what" and "are."
Alls I knows is i liked episode 8 more than any other Star wars film other than rogue one.... And if it wasn't for Andor, i would have wrote Star Wars off as dead to me after episode 9.
I think episode 8 is the second best OG trilogy. But I think I might be alone on that.
Very good faith argument right there, lol.
Seems like the social engineering that Disney has subjected you to has worked well.
The way I see it, they have always used diversity as a shield against any and all criticism leveled at their lazy, corporate, shitty movies based on beloved franchises. Saddest part is that people like whoever made this comic completely gobbled up those talking points, ignoring the fact that these movies genuinely suck and are in no way empowering nor inclusive in any deeper way than on the surface.
I also say this as a woman who has tried several times to get into star wars and failed to find even the original trilogy appealing: every single sloppy movie Disney has shat out the last decade or so, with extreme few exceptions, has been some pandering, childish and condescending bs that makes me as a woman feel talked down to and I hate that they pretend like this is the best women can expect and that any criticism leveled as their piss poor products is supposedly attacks against us women and that Disney is somehow our defenders. Fuck right off.
It is a soulless corporate tactic to use diversity to snuff out conversation and criticism and anyone who falls for that shit is not someone I'd want to know, because ironically, I sincerely doubt a person like that is able to form any independent thought without having the corporate, pre-approved PC talking points fed to them through media.
Hilarious.
Fate of the old republic
Nailed it.
The power of one, the power of maaAAaAAaaAaanyyyyy.
Better a white female lead than a black male lead, amirite China? And Russia? And Saudi Arabia? ....And Amerikkka?
I haven't watched a star wars movie since the one with the high ground.
last jedi is the 2nd best star wars movie. argue with a brick wall
Considering A New Hope was the best movie according to a lot of people, it's not surprising that people would think A New New Hope was the second best.
You're not alone.
I think that the film would've been great if it wasn't second in a trilogy.
It introduced three extra main characters to an already very packed cast, it killed practically all the story lines started in TFA, it basically broke the Star Wars setting with the Holdo Manoeuvre, and it ended by showing not just a Force Sensitive kid, but a kid that already uses the Force for mundane tasks with ease. After Order 66, this is something tremendously important, and shouldn't be used as a "cut to ending credits" scene, with the character never mentioned again.
If it was the third film in the trilogy, without all the Canto Bight stuff and with some resolution of the Rey vs Ben story, it'd be a solid 9/10 for me. But as it is, I struggle to give it more than 6.
If it didn't demote Finn from a growing protagonist and lead love interest to a clown who gets to have the demeaning side plot so fans could have their emo boy instead, and if Rei's barely-there character development didn't fly into that brick wall, and if Poe's moral of the story wasn't to learn how to bow to authoritarianism, I might have agreed with you.
Female leads are the worst aren't they? (Don't know why, some fat fucking nerd told me so)
That's easy.
If it is made by Disney then it's bad.
It might be an entertaining movie, but it being made and controlled by Disney makes it into a bad thing.