Skip Navigation

Bulletins and International News Discussion from November 3rd to November 9th, 2025 - The 47th ASEAN Summit + Trump and Xi's Deal

Image is sourced from this article depicting the 28th ASEAN Plus Three Summit, which took place at the same time as the 47th ASEAN Summit.


Last week concluded the 47th summit of ASEAN in Malaysia as well as a swathe of concurrent summits surrounding ASEAN. For those unfamiliar, formally, China is not a member of ASEAN, but is part of the ASEAN Plus Three (as part of the "Three", alongside Japan and Occupied Southern Korea). And while not really ASEAN, there is also a yet wider organization, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, which tacks on Australia and New Zealand to the group of countries that are currently in ASEAN (which is the single largest trade bloc on the planet). At the summit, Timor-Leste was officially introduced into ASEAN, making it the 11th country to do and the first since Cambodia in 1999.

Many important figures throughout Asia, as well as Trump, Ramaphosa, and Lula, attended the event. As you can imagine, Trump's appearance was not exactly positive - signing four rather coerced bilateral deals there, including with Malaysia, which forced those countries to buy American goods in exchange for certain exemptions from Trump's high tariff regime. The US is currently in a bit of a panic due to China restricting access to rare earths, a critical component of many weapons technologies (and electronics in general) and is looking around for countries to help supply them. After the summit, the US and China signed a deal related to tariffs and rare earths, but it seems very unlikely that this is the end of the saga; the US politically, economically, and militarily cannot tolerate China's existence as a sovereign actor and will try to overcome them until the American Empire topples.

Meanwhile, China did as they ordinarily do, and urged higher regional integration and trade without high tariffs, as well as adherence to the Global Governance Initiative (which, as we here never tire of noting, is an interesting thing to try and encourage while the US only more feverishly violates the sovereignty of nations everywhere). One hopes they're supplying a bit more than just speeches to Venezuela, Cuba, and beyond, as the US prepares to start bombing.


Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

::: spoiler Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


:::

You're viewing a single thread.

710 comments
  • Complete breakdown of the 2025 Iraqi Parliamentary Elections

    Bismillah

    We mustn’t forget that this place started as an offshoot of a certain subreddit that was named r/ChapoTrapHouse, a place that Islamic explorer Qathib Al Kabir visited in 1441 AH. He wrote this in his memoirs:

    I also saw the Chapos. They had come to post and had disembarked upon the front page of Reddit. Never have I seen minds so convinced of their own dialectical perfection. They’re fair, of average stature, they wear neither suits nor ties, and their main source of illumination is their triple monitors. Every man wears a hoodie that covers half his dignity, so that one arm may clutch a vape.

    They carry irony, memes, and citations to Lenin and Wikipedia, and always have them to hand. They wield podcast microphones of formidable make, forged in the fires of struggle sessions. They speak of electoralism with a fervor both mocking and sincere.

    Yet I beheld among them a curious contradiction, they sin greatly by committing to electoralism, whispering of “lesser evils” and “harm reduction” as if these were sacraments. When such weakness overcomes them, they hasten to atone. They do this not by prayer, but by posting a certain picture of Lenin, his gaze stern yet forgiving, accompanied by words of repentance and a number of ironic upvotes. Thus their consciences are cleansed, and they return once more to the holy work of posting.

    The Travels of Qathib Al Kabir, p.69.

    Here we are in 2025, and I’m writing a mega post on the Iraqi Parliamentary Elections that are set to be held on November 11th. Call this a homage to Chapo’s electoral past, but I’m a nerd, you’re all nerds, so let’s just jump into it.

    ::: spoiler Section 2 - Breakdown of Parties and Candidates by Region

    I initially broke down this by governorate, but it became too cluttered. I know my long ass tables are popular within megathread circles, but you’re getting wide boi tables that will break the thread on mobile instead of many long tables.

    I have divided the country into four regions to make it easier for everyone. Region 1 is Baghdad, the mixed capital with a fat number of seats. Region 2 is the Shia-majority South (Babil, Basra, Dhi Qar, Karbala, Maysan, Muthanna, Najaf, Qadisiyya, Wasit), because the exact same parties are running in pretty much every governorate here. Region 3 is Sunni Arab-majority governorates (Anbar, Diyala, Nineveh, Saladin), because again it looks kinda similar here, but with a little twist in Diyala and Nineveh, as we have significant Kurdish and Shia minorities in those governorates. Region 4 is Kurdish-majority governorates (Duhok, Erbil, Kirkuk, Sulaymaniyah), similar parties in all governorates, with an important Arab + Turkmen minority in Kirkuk.

    PART TWO FOLLOWS IN COMMENTS

      • ::: spoiler Section 2 - Sunni Regions

        Party Important candidates Estimated seats in whole Iraq Political positions Personal commentary
        Taqaddum (Progress) Haibat Al Halbusi, Muzahim Al Khayyat, Mohammed Tamim 35-45 Sunni, Secularism, Economic Liberalism, Pro-Gulf Mohammed Al Halbusi’s cousin Haibat is the main guy here in Anbar. Taqaddum were already close to a clean sweep last elections in Anbar, and I expect a similar performance with how Halbusi’s popularity has exploded in Baghdad and Anbar. They have a strong candidate in known surgeon and politician Al Khayyat in Nineveh. They will also dominate the Sunni Arab vote in Kirkuk, with former minister Tamim in a leading role there.
        Azem (Determination) Sinan Al Nujayfi, Muthanna Al Samaraei 15-20 Sunni Islamists, Pro-Turkey, Tribal politics Sinan is the heir to the disgraced Nujayfi family that ruled Nineveh around the time of the ISIS capture of Mosul. He seems like a chill guy though and is generally liked in Nineveh. Muthanna Al Samaraei is extremely annoying, but he’s a skilled politician and has managed to gather lots of support for Azem in Saladin province. Azem have basically given up on Anbar, with a very weak list there.
        Minor Parties in Saladin Ahmed Al Jubori (spiritual leader) 1-3 Mostly tribal politics and Anti-Iran stances There are lots of smaller parties that are running just in Saladin. The region was very damaged by ISIS, so lots of random movements have sprung up with isolationist stances. They’re focused on agricultural reforms and limiting harassment by some PMU elements who sometimes act in a sectarian manner towards local Sunnis. Tribal politics in Saladin are dominated by the Jubori clan, so literally half of the candidates in these smaller parties are Juboris.
        Shia Parties in Diyala and Nineveh - 5-10-ish (in these provinces only) Shia Islamism, Pro-Iran, PMU-aligned A significant Shia minority exists in Diyala and Nineveh, so several seats will go to them. Those seats will mostly go to Badr in Diyala, and Sadiqoun in Nineveh. Most Shias in Nineveh are actually Turkmen and not Arab, but they vote after religious lines and not ethnic lines like the Turkmen of Kirkuk. Sudani’s party are also running in Nineveh and they’ll get a few seats just off name recognition.
        Kurdish Parties in Nineveh - 10-13 (Nineveh only) Kurdish interests in Nineveh Kurds are the largest group in Nineveh after Sunni Arabs, so their parties usually get a significant number of seats. Most seats will go to the Kurdistan Democratic Party led by the good old Barzani family. The Kurdish opposition led by the New Generation movement (more on them later) might snatch one or two seats, and the PUK led by the Talabani clan might also snatch a few seats.
        Minority seats in Nineveh Waad Qado (Shabak), Rayan Al Kiladani (Christian) 3 (Nineveh only) Pro-PMU? I’m just writing this section to talk about my favourite Iraqi character when writing this. I’m talking about Mr Rayan Al Kildani (literally Ryan the Chaldean). He’s a Christian dude from a Christian village in the mountains, but he’s somehow one of the most important guys in the Shia militia PMU landscape, which is insane. He’s somehow more pro-Iran than the strongest Shia Islamist from Najaf, and local Christians also mostly hate him because he keeps dragging his endangered religious group into massive regional disputes. He has also completely co-opted the Christian minority seats by encouraging Shias in Baghdad and Nineveh to vote for his candidates. Waad Qado is the budget version of him, but for Shabaks.

        Summary Sunni regions + Sunni Arabs in Kirkuk: Taqaddum = 25-30 seats, Azem 10-15 seats, Shia parties = 5-10, Kurdish Parties = 10, Minorities + independents + smaller parties = 10-15.

        :::

        ::: spoiler Section 2 - Kurdistan Region + Kirkuk

        Party Important candidates Estimated seats in whole Iraq Political positions Personal commentary
        Kurdistan Democratic Party Rebwar Hadi, (Masoud & Masrour Barzani, spiritual leaders) 25-35 Kurdish separatism, liberal economic policies If there’s anything that is 100% guaranteed every election, it’s that Kurds will with full loyalty vote for Barzani’s party in Erbil, Duhok and the Kurdish parts of Nineveh. Their list of candidates is weaker than usual this time, as a new generation of Barzani loyalists is taking over the Party, but they’ll get their 30-ish seats as usual.
        Patriotic Union of Kurdistan Rebwar Taha, (Bafel Talabani, spiritual leader) 15-20 Kurdish Nationalism, Social Democracy The PUK led by the eternal Jalal Talabani’s son Bafel have just ended their biggest internal power struggle since their founding, with Bafel winning over his cousin Lahur Talabani. The PUK have excellent relations with the Federal government in Baghdad and with Iran, which is why the PUK candidate for President of Iraq has won twice in a row now. Their main candidate Rebwar Taha is the governor of Kirkuk, and he’s quite popular even with Arabs, so they’ll dominate the Kurdish vote in Kirkuk.
        New Generation Sirwe Abdulwahid 5-10 Liberalism, Secularism, Pro-Baghdad A new kind of Kurdish party, they don’t really care about Kurdish nationalism. Businessman Shaswar is Sirwe’s younger brother and the main backer of the party. They’re quite popular within youth circles in Sulaymaniyah especially, mainly due to opposing both the Barzani and the Talabani clans. Sirwe is one of the most popular female politicians in the whole country and could be a candidate for the presidency. Shaswar is currently in prison and Sirwe is banned from the Kurdistan region, so she operates from Baghdad.
        All other Kurdish parties Ali Bapir, Ali Hama Saleh 1-3 Everything from communists to jihadists. Good luck and have some fun
        Turkmens in Kirkuk Arshad Al Salihi, Ghareeb Askar 1-3 Some pro-Turkey, some pro-Baghdad There are like 10 Turkmens left in the country who haven’t immigrated to Turkey, and they all hate each other. Relations in Kirkuk between Arabs and Kurds in Kirkuk are finally good, so the Turkmen find a way to feel left out and start fighting everyone. Al Salihi is the spiritual leader of most Turkmen, and he held a speech a few days ago where he declared the Kirkuk is Turkey, so it’s a hopeless situation out there tbh.

        :::

        • ::: spoiler Section 3 - Questions and Discussion

          Where are the Sadrists?

          I have written about the Sadrists multiple time here, and their story gets weirder and weirder. The best way to understand them is not seeing them as a political movement, but more as a cult in the image of Muqtada Al Sadr and his father Mohammed Sadiq Al Sadr. They haven’t been really interested in actually exercising political power, and when they have done it, they haven’t been good at it. Sadrist governors have ruled in places like Maysan and Dhi Qar before, and the results have been extremely subpar. It’s not easy to effectively govern when a governor is actively waiting for guidance from his spiritual leader Muqtada Al Sadr. Sadrists were the largest bloc in both the 2018 and the 2021 elections, but they failed to leverage that into a serious coalition, nor a major part of the governments that were formed after the elections. In 2021, Al Sadr failed to achieve a ruling coalition, which led to a deadlock that ended with Sadrists storming the Iraqi Parliament, occupying it for months, and in the end getting into firefights with police and military forces and losing. They nearly dragged the country into a civil war if it weren’t for the rumoured intervention of both the US and Iran that calmed everything down in the end. My analysis is that the humiliation in August 2022 made Sadr realise that his movement can’t do effective political work, and that a withdrawal would be less humiliating than getting outmanoeuvred for a 3rd election in a row. All that talk about talk about the country’s political system being corrupt and distrust in democratic institutions is partly true, but it’s mostly cover for the Sadrists’ lack of political instincts and failure to effectively establish themselves as a serious political force, as opposed to their current image of a volatile outsider political movement that waits for Al Sadr to receive some kind of divine guidance before making a decision. I personally like the Sadrists because they’re simple poor people that have been fucked over by the country’s volatility, but their inability to commit to a project is infuriating.

          PMU status and US involvement

          As Iraq heads into the parliamentary elections, the fight over the Popular Mobilization Units (PMU) Authority Bill is a major issue. This law aims to better tie the Shia militias that fought ISIS into Iraq's official security forces. But it was pulled back in late August after strong pushback from the U.S. and splits inside Iraq's parliament, leaving it on hold for now. The bill passed a key review in July and would give the PMU more independence, steady pay, and a lasting spot under the Popular Mobilization Commission, rewarding their key role against ISIS from 2014 to 2017. Still, the U.S. and others say it would boost Iran's control through these groups and hurt Iraq's own power, leading to threats of sanctions and tough talks that slowed everything down especially with bigger U.S.-Iraq fights over disarming militias, which Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani ties to a full U.S. troop pullout by late 2026. This delay could widen rifts in the Shia Coordination Framework that facilitated the government formation in 2021, upset Sunni and Kurdish groups who fear PMU meddling in places like Nineveh, and make after-election deals even harder, which might spark protests like those in 2021, while blocking it could lead to attacks from militias guarding their cut of oil deals and building projects. From a Hexbear perspective, the idea of the PMU should be a positive one as a force that counters US influence in the country. But sadly, the PMU is not as disciplined as Hezbollah in Lebanon, nor have the power base that Ansarallah have in Yemen and are the main drivers of religious fundamentalism in the country. Mark Savaya, a Michigan-based cannabis entrepreneur and prominent donor to Trump's campaigns, was appointed as the U.S. Special Envoy to Iraq just last month. Savaya has already signaled a hardline stance against non-state armed groups like the PMU, warning that Iraq's sovereignty hangs in the balance without their full integration into official forces, which could intensify U.S. diplomatic pressure on Baghdad to kill the stalled Authority Bill. His efforts to "dilute Iranian influence" through talks with Iraqi leaders like Prime Minister Al Sudani might sway Shia factions toward concessions on militia disarmament, potentially averting a post-election backlash but risking unrest if perceived as meddling in Iraq's internal power-sharing dynamics.

          Government formation?

          With projected seats of around 50 for Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al Sudani's Reconstruction and Development Alliance, 70+ for Iran-backed PMU-aligned parties, 40-ish for the Sunni Taqaddum led by Mohammed Al Halbusi, 15 for the rival Sunni Azem, and 30 for the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP), forming Iraq's next government would likely hinge on a broad Shia-Kurdish-Sunni coalition to clear the 165-seat majority threshold for key votes, as no single bloc dominates in this fragmented 329-seat parliament. Sudani's group and the Shia militias could combine for 120 seats, falling short but providing a strong core, adding the KDP's 30 would push it to 150, leaving room to integrate Taqaddum's 40 for a comfortable 190-seat majority that balances ethno-sectarian quotas as usual. A Shia for prime minister (likely Sudani again), Kurd for president (It will probably be the KDP’s turn this time, as the PUK have too much internal issues), and Sunni for parliament speaker (Taqaddum's edge over Azem giving Halbousi leverage). However, this setup risks prolonged haggling, potentially 200+ days as in past elections, over cabinet shares and veto powers, with Shia demands for PMU entrenchment clashing against Sunni and Kurdish pushback on oil revenues and disputed territories like Kirkuk, while sidelining Azem could spark Sunni infighting or protests. If talks collapse, independents or smaller lists (accounting for the remaining 125-ish seats) might tip the scales toward a looser "unity" government, but that could dilute reforms and invite veto blocs, further entrenching the much-criticised Muhasasa (Ethno-religious) system currently in place.

          If you have made it this far, congrats! Also you’re a nerd. No proof reading, you can handle it if I misspell or forget a word.

    • Thank you so much for all this work comrade, always reliable and informative.

    • Rayan Al Kildani

      Is this the guy that founded the Babylon Brigades to fight against ISIS, and then got sanctioned by the US because of ties to the Popular Mobilisation Forces and video emerged of him cutting someone's ear off? Certainly a character.

      Al Mada is reporting that the US is behind decisions to try remove the Babylon Brigades from Hamdaniya district.

      • That's the guy. What an insane character, but all his contradictions have left an overall positive effect on Christian visibility in the country. I mostly don't agree with him and he's definitely more of a mafia leader than an actual politician, but I respect the pure grind mentality in getting a pretty oversized chair at the table of power in Iraq. Chaldeans are a minority within a minority, but he's up there with the big boys, being involved even more than most Sunnis and Kurds in making the big decisions in the country.

    • Knowing next to nothing of Iraqi politics previously, I found this effortpost easy to read and highly informative. I wish the people of Iraq good luck with finding a working coalition government.

    • The chuds have "Big Balls". The left has "LargePenis". This is dialectics.

    • Just want to say that your insight into the various countries of Western Asia is incredibly appreciated. I occassionally check your account to see if you've posted, just because I find your writing interesting.

710 comments