Skip Navigation

User banner
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
slakemoth @ slakemoth @lemmygrad.ml
Posts
0
Comments
67
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Take Back Water - Join the water payment strike!

    Jump

  • Yes austerity is also to blame , this doesn't counter the observation that private companies don't do their due diligence to invest. especially when they have been making profits.

  • Take Back Water - Join the water payment strike!

    Jump

  • UK child poverty numbers reach a record high

    Jump

  • Nothing like a good war to quell the numbers of poor! Better get those troops to the Ukraine asap!

  • Brexit a key factor in worst UK medicine shortages in four years, report says

    Jump

  • Remoaners are the most annoying people on the planet apart from actual fascists but they do have a slight point here

    The actual report, to side step guardian bs, states that all EU countries have suffered growth in medicine imports but its slightly worse in the UK due to Brexit. This is still a widespread issue with supply chains made slightly worse by brexit. Not that brexit is causing the issue, as the Guardian headline would want you to think.

    It seems the Procurement act of 2023 has meant that we've moved away from EU slightly which means we are more susceptible to corrupt dealings with less transparency over procurement? I dont fully understand the act but that's what the Nuffield report states. If so, then that means this isn't brexit per se but just Tory opening up the Nhs to private contracts more easily. This could easily be changed by our incumbent government but they obviously wont as it means less contracts for their mates.

    The guardian often want to show that brexit is main reason things are bad and ignore problems that are clearly due to national policy and the highs and lows of global capitalism. Brexit does exacerbate some issues but its rarely the cause of them.

  • Quakers condemn police raid on Westminster Meeting House

    Jump

  • Disgusting pigs

  • Rachel Reeves is all about growth. So why won’t she admit that Brexit is its worst enemy?

    Jump

  • I would vote for re entry but this is wishful thinking surely. Not that i think the two parties are any different, but it would be a gift to the tories.

    We need a generation to clear before this changes.

    Although there could be enough political capital to do this if there was escalation of war with Russia or USA became too unpalatable a trade partner. I dunno

  • Police to block ‘intimidating’ protests near places of worship, says Home Office

    Jump

  • Like fuck will they stop the fash going near mosques, the real two tier policing!

    I fucking hate how these libs have made it so being a jew is conflated with Israel. Imagine if every time we called out Saudi Arabia for its bullshit we were called islamophobic? I attended a bat mitzvah recently and all i did was hope no one said anything Zionist. The fact i even think that is so disgusting. This is the work of Zionist lobbying for years and years to make Israel connected to broader Judaism.

  • How The Deep State Actually Works | Aaron Bastani Meets Matt Kennard

    Jump

  • I love matt kennard, a serious journalist with a lot of integrity. Declassified is great.

    The deep state here refers to the informal network of mates and lobby groups and secret service nut jobs. I don't see why the right should be the only ones able to criticise informal networks of power! The bourgeoisie are like a hydra after all.

    I'm sure that some of the people in high level mi5 and military aren't operating cynically, they probably believe the ideology. This is Chomsky's great observation, that those in the 'deep state' or whatever are only able to be there because they hold certain opinions. The informal network would always select against those with views contrary to western ideology. It isn't about some nut job conspiracy.

  • Further benefits cuts planned as Rachel Reeves forced to find extra £1.6bn

    Jump

  • Even if all claims of benefit fraud were true - would it matter? You always expect some free loading on any system. I mean have you ever had a friend who doesn't get the rounds in, why do you keep them around? I imagine its because you value them in some other way. The benefit fraud bill is low compared to the billions sitting about in tax havens and in property.

    fine they might take the piss but its ultimately better that the system is there and the money is available in a dignified way. Do you really think getting those people back to work would be helpful to the economy? They aren't exactly going to be motivated are they? Or are you more concerned with punishment? Because that's a different matter altogether

  • All UK families ‘to be worse off by 2030’ as poor bear the brunt, new data warns

    Jump

  • Man i really hate being proved right about starmer - they aren't just as bad as the tories, they are literally making things worse. The problem is this lot actually believe in the nonsense they spout, the tories are just mates with capital owners, this lot are actually just boot lickers.

  • All UK families ‘to be worse off by 2030’ as poor bear the brunt, new data warns

    Jump

  • i dont understand people like you

    how is giving people less money going to improve their mental health? do you really think they just need a kick up the ass?

    the benefit bill is such a small amount of money compared to what could be gained by wealth taxes or corp tax. the only reason it comes up is it distracts people from the real issues and makes a convenient political football.

  • All UK families ‘to be worse off by 2030’ as poor bear the brunt, new data warns

    Jump

  • when will people stop believing this nonsense - governments aren't households balancing the books. the UK government has almost endless ability to borrow money.

    what they don't have is the endless ability to do is spend money on public infrastructure as the IMF will decide the UK is no longer good for business and we would be outcast or strongarmed like Greece or Cuba.

    Its perhaps politically not possible to go against the neoliberal consensus, but saying its do with economics is ideological clap trap

  • All UK families ‘to be worse off by 2030’ as poor bear the brunt, new data warns

    Jump

  • what tough choices? they are just ideologically neo-liberal, they love doing austerity. they probably genuinely believe that disabled people are just lazy scroungers

  • Starmer says cost of sickness benefits 'devastating' - BBC News

    Jump

  • Use your brain - if they are cutting it by 5bil then they will make it harder for people to get PIP that is undoubtedly true as how else would they make savings.

    Those people will no longer be able to afford essentials. Hence, could become homeless.

    many of those on PIP already work bear in mind.

    In order to make savings, they will have to force those unable to work to work which will either cause them to have worsened chronic health issues (which will cost NHS more), or cause them to be homeless as they cant work, or force them to rely on carers even further.

    The idea that there are lots of people on PIP who could work with some encouragement is frankly ridiculous

  • The government says it must cut benefits for the disabled They are completely wrong - Professor Richard Murphy

    Jump

  • Yeah totally agree

  • Starmer says cost of sickness benefits 'devastating' - BBC News

    Jump

  • Even if that's true it doesn't stop them needing the money

    The problem here is landlords not benefit claimant's

    Get rid of landlords, they can simply sign on

  • Starmer says cost of sickness benefits 'devastating' - BBC News

    Jump

  • The red tape being removed just means lower quality housing. Don't fall for sloganeering.

  • Starmer says cost of sickness benefits 'devastating' - BBC News

    Jump

  • Isnt the main issues that voters have the cost of living, failing nhs, landlords?

    Planning regulations aren't going to see any wins, nor is improving energy girds, important as those things are.

    Its been shown that increases in housing stock has minimal effects on rent prices. A very cheap solution to this is rent control, it literally costs nothing. They could also build social housing if they wanted to invest money in something useful.

    The NHS needs money, there is no getting around this unfortunately. All the fat trimming has been done.

    Cost of living is obviously more complicated and i won't pretend to understand that level of macro. But you seem to be concerned that increases in deficit ie borrowing would cause debts to increase. This always happens when any government does anything remotely left wing, look at how the USA treats cuba. The political fact is that to be left wing you have to accept USA aligned countries making it more expensive for you to borrow. If Corbyn had won we would have been battered by this, but the trick is to nationalise the economy and become independent.

    I can sympathise with some of what you're saying,but you make it out as if néolibéral policy is capable of doing those things as well as positioning it as the only route possible, which is disingenuous. You're making a political statement, not a descriptive diagnosis.

  • The government says it must cut benefits for the disabled They are completely wrong - Professor Richard Murphy

    Jump

  • All i can see this cut doing is forcing carers to work extra jobs if they can, or forcing more people onto the street. It won't get any of these people into work.