little_water_bear @ little_water_bear @discuss.tchncs.de Posts 1Comments 19Joined 2 yr. ago
Ich finde, mit diesem Kommentar hast du das, was ich mir wünschen würde, schon ziemlich gut erfüllt.
Dass Amthor und seine Kollegen kritisierungswürdige Sachen verbergen, ist doch schon mal etwas, was man, wie du es getan hast, kritisieren kann.
Wenn man daraus jetzt Memes machen würde, hätte ich nichts dagegen. Das klingt mir auch mit einer Wortwahl wie der deinen viel sachlicher und mehr auf seine Taten bezogen als ein Witz über sein jugendliches Aussehen.
entspann dich mal
Es ist jetzt nicht so, als würde ich hier wutentbrannt in die Tasten hauen. Aber ich empfinde das als Unrecht und dachte dementsprechend, es wäre nur richtig, das dann auch mal anzusprechen.
es is halt nur ein Witz
Das sehe ich anders. Ich finde das Bild zwar auch amüsant. Aber es ist ja eben nicht nur das eine Bild.
Zum Einen wird speziell dieser Witz so oft gebracht, dass ich es nicht mehr "nur" einen Witz nennen würde. Genau wie wenn jemand "nur" einen Witz über die Form meiner Nase machen würde. Aber das ständig, jahrelang.
Zum Anderen war dieser Post hier zwar der Auslöser, aber nicht der einzige Grund für meinen Kommentar. Über die ganzen anderen Politiker wird hier ja in ähnlicher Manier gepostet.
Ich wollte damit auch nicht speziell dich angreifen. Ich finde deine Posts und Kommentare ja sonst auch ganz unterhaltsam. Das hier war nur eben der nächstbeste Post, bei dem mir das wieder aufgefallen war und bei dem ich gerade die Gelegenheit hatte, mal was dazu zu schreiben.
Vielleicht in diesen Kreisen eine unpopuläre Meinung, aber ich finde es gar nicht gut, wie hier über einige Politiker gepostet wird.
Gibt es am Amthor nicht genug sachliches zu kritisieren? Warum muss denn auf Merkmale von ihm zurückgegriffen werden, die mit seiner eventuell verachtenswerten Arbeit nichts zu tun haben?
Das ist meiner Ansicht nach nicht besser, als wenn sich Rechte daran aufhängen, dass Habeck Kinderbuchautor war.
Ich finde, sowas lässt sich auch nicht damit rechtfertigen, ob es einen "guten" oder "schlechten" Menschen trifft.
Unsachliche Polemik ist Unrecht, egal wen es trifft.
Oh, ok, I get what you are saying.
Well, unfortunately those are problems of a caliber that I wouldn't be able to solve for you. Nor do I think that anybody else here can.
A (somewhat vague) answer for your first point might be that you need to change your perspective. But that is easier said than done and I don't want to pretend that I know how shitty your live might actually is.
For your second point, it is at least very good that you were able to recognize bad content on your own. Many people fail that.
You could try to find drastically different videos from different groups of people. Again, I know this is easier said than done.
I think most people on Lemmy are strictly against religion, so I don't think you will find much help in that regard here.
Maybe as a starting point, you could try to find resources from a totally different group of people. Depending on your exact questions you might want to watch videos about what people of other religions might have to say about that.
Like, if you want to know more about something from the old testament you could try to watch videos from jews, or if you have questions about Jesus you could look up what the muslims have to say about that.
I wish you all the best! Try to endure until you know, what it is you can strive for.
Why would you even want to live such a long life? If you believe in an eternal life after death in heaven or hell, wouldn't you hope to die soon, as long as you don't live a sinful life (which includes not dying on purpose)? So that you can stop working in this hard life and finally enjoy paradise?
If you don't want to trust people in churches near you, you can try to slowly gather all the answers you want on your own from the internet. But be careful with this!
For one, there are many more possibilities to get the wrong answers online than in local communities. So it can easily happen to fall in deep rabbit holes of stuff that won't benefit you.
And, it can be really overwhelming to sort out information about such topics online.
So please, take things slowly.
I don't think that your god expects you to be perfectly informed in a matter of days, weeks or even months.
If you are able to slowly explore the answers to whatever questions you might have, you will most likely find everything you need.
Just by watching YouTube videos alone, one could spend thousands upon thousands of hours educating oneself about all this stuff.
But again, be careful with that. Take small steps.
Regarding your original question, Nemo has already given you a good answer. I want to add that if you believe in heaven and hell, why would you care if you efforts are rewarded in this life? Wouldn't you try to "be as good as you can", no matter how others react to that? Would your god not reward you after your death accordingly and punish those who treated you unfairly, if they truly deserve punishment? So why even care? If you believe in a god that eventually brings justice to everyone, just try to be as good of a person as you can be. Whatever this exactly means for you.
It will be. Islamic events are scheduled by a lunar calendar, which has less days in a year than our solar calendars. So things like the fasting in Ramadan and the pilgrimage are about 11 days earlier each year. So in like 12 years the Hajj should be during February.
I'm no expert, but I think the events the pilgrims attend to are strictly tied to the time of day, meaning they can't be rescheduled to be in the night.
I would like to know what the general opinion about this sentence is.
Personally, I think that people like that are too dangerous to ever be let free again. But I still believe that we should never allow anyone to kill someone for punishment.
Also I'm wondering whether other's opinions are influenced by how much they like the works of KyoAni.
I don't think it should matter at all. But to be honest, the only reason I even read about the fire was because anime communities were posting about it.
But if you actually had infinite time, then that would mean that the world for all intents and purposes has ended. It would never continue, ever. No matter what you do, it would have absolutely no impact at all.
Furthermore, I imagine if you actually had to wait infinitely long for the answer to finish, that would be like hell. There is only so much you can look at in a frozen world, assuming you would even be able to move at all. I can hardly imagine any happiness after some billions and trillions of years of no new stimuli in a frozen world.
Das ist ein guter Punkt, danke dafür. Solche künstlichen Brücken nicht zu bestärken ist schon sinnvoll. Dass ich überhaupt einen Zusammenhang zur Partei in meinem Kommentar hergestellt habe, war vielleicht nicht klug von mir. Ich habe mich wohl schon daran gewöhnt, dass die Einflüsse auf das Klima von Leuten, die für Klimaschutz werben, regelmäßig thematisiert werden.
Andererseits finde ich aber, dass der Artikel durchaus einen guten Job dabei gemacht hat, die anlassgebende Person vom eigentlichen Inhalt zu trennen. Es gibt eine Einleitung mit den Infos zum aktuellen Fall. Danach ist es ein reiner Artikel über Kerosinablässe im Allgemeinen, mit allem was dazugehört.
Aber klar, schöner wäre es, wenn sowas nicht immer nur im Zusammenhang mit bestimmten politisch aktiven Personen diskutiert werden würde.
Mich würde interessieren, warum dieser Post runtergewählt wird. Möchte das vielleicht jemand erwähnen?
Ich habe das Gefühl, die Grünen wären hier recht beliebt. Liegt es also daran, dass der erste Teil der Überschrift nicht viel Bekanntheit erlangen soll? Oder ist vielleicht etwas mit der Kernaussage des Beitrags nicht richtig, dass das ganze nicht so schlimm sei?
This is a good explanation, thank you. I didn't think about people who literally post stuff to earn money. Since so much talk already revolved around scraping sites like Lemmy, that was all I had in mind.
What you describe sounds like the same problem with services that avoid paywalls or ads of news sites.
In this case I fully aggree that some solution needs to be found.
Thank you. I haven't thought about copyright just now. This is indeed something that needs to be addressed.
Although I personally still don't have much of a problem with that. I think copyright laws are highly debatable.
This comparison is lacking because water is unlike data. The data can still be accessed exactly the same. It doesn't become less and the access to it is not restricted by other people harvesting it.
Could somebody explain why this is bad? I'm not a fan of all this AI stuff. But I can't think of an argument besides "Big tech is bad and they should not make money if they use public information to do so."
I'm genuinely curious. There may be massive amounts of data being processed. But only public data, right? If they can use that data for something, isn't that something positive? Or at the very least nothing negative? I always thought anything that is posted in public spaces means making it available for anyone to use anyway. So what am I missing here?
Hello. I enjoy reading through discussion threads and noticed there wasn't one for Rent-a-Girlfriend yet, so I created one. If there is anything I might have missed, please let me know.
This season already starts with too much cringeworthy lusting over Chizuru from Kazuya. I really don't like those parts. Maybe they help the show by having people talk about it? Idk. But still, I'm kinda invested and want to see more. I look forward to wherever this is going. It looks like some drama involving Ruka, Mami and possibly at some point the neighbor Mini is about to unfold.
Not just frequent jokes, but those annoying ever-repeating jokes. Like as if 80% of users were the same person. Before opening any post on Reddit, there is a good chance to be able to correctly predict the exact content of a significant portion of the comments. I get that it can be funny to an individual to come across stuff like "I also choose this guys wife" or "And my axe" more than once. But for people like me, who did not just start using the website, it is really annoying to come across the same jokes literally hundreds of times.
This goes hand in hand with the general idea of a "Reddit hivemind". Depending on the subs you visit, you can see that Reddits userbase is actually really diverse. There are people from every demographic with all kinds of different life experiences. But in a lot of subs, anytime a woman is mentioned there is a flood of people acting like as if there are no women on the internet and as if no person using Reddit could have a girlfriend. Again, I get that it can be funny once or twice. But when the idea that every user must be a typical "Redditor" gets repeated all the time it's just annoying. Needless to say that I don't look forward to being called a "Lemming" on this site.
Also, repeating comments on the same post. Obviously you don't have to read all the comments if there are already hundreds of them. But if there are too many comments saying the exact same thing it just gets harder to read them all. So it would be nice if people would look whether the point they want to make maybe has been made already. They can increase that comment's visibility by upvoting. No need to make other people read the same content multiple times and by that make it harder to read different comments.
No, I don't have heard of such a website. (Although the comment made by Shady_Shiroe comes funnily close to it.) But that is probably because all ad supported sites I visit have more than enough users without adblock to support themselves.
From a pure, real and practical standpoint you are right. For you and me and most users here it won't do any harm to use adblock. But that only works because there are so many people who don't. If everyone were to use adblock now, then the websites would start to either find ways to circumvent the adblock or they would not be available anymore, either because they went down or got paywalled. I'm fine with paying for some websites. But there are too many things I think are useful on the internet to be able to pay for each and every thing I see individually or via subscription.
What I want to say is that I don't think it would be good if a big portion of users would start to use adblock so I don't think it could be right for any individual person to do so, even if you can't tell how many more adblock users it would take to make a negative impact.