Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)LT
Lord Trickster @ kooltechlord @lemm.ee

Yet another software enthusiast

Posts 2
Comments 2
There are teenagers on the fediverse.
    • LibreWolf @lemmy.ml Lord Trickster @lemm.ee

    LibreWolf team has joined Mastodon
    chaos.social LibreWolf (@librewolf@chaos.social)

    9 Posts, 1 Following, 3.12K Followers · A custom version of Firefox, focused on privacy, security and freedom. This account is managed by the LibreWolf team. Its purpose is to mostly be used for announcements (important changes, updates, etc.) concerning LibreWolf. Please report issues at: https...

    LibreWolf (@librewolf@chaos.social)

    Finally people will no longer be confused with this Lemmy community and accidentally post here.

    0
    Why LibreWolf isn't in the official Arch repositories?

  • I thought it is already maintained? And it's popular enough to have someone who would do it?

    • Arch Linux @lemmy.ml Lord Trickster @lemm.ee

    Why LibreWolf isn't in the official Arch repositories?

    From Wiki:

    > When PKGBUILDs receive enough community interest and the support of a Package Maintainer, they are moved into the extra repository (maintained by the Package Maintainers) <...>

    So, librewolf package has 150 votes and librewolf-bin has 429 votes. And it's 6th most popular package in AUR (by "Popularity" metric). Why it still isn't in official repos?

    I understand why things like yay or google-chrome isn't in official repos, but browsers like LibreWolf seems reasonable to include. Other browsers Brave, Zen, Ungoogled Chromium isn't in official repos too, but Vivaldi is.

    5