Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)H
Posts
5
Comments
1178
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Disgusting. You should put them in a box and drop them off at my house. I’ll take care of them for you

  • Trump loco - loses or chickens out

  • We have cameras and ICE now though

  • The most informative error messages: “Got a problem? See me.”

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Hahahaha fuck off

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • They noted that it cannot be guaranteed safe. You can clone a specific version, and perform security audits on that specific version before deployment. Is it a lot of work? Yes. But it is indeed possible.

  • Let us inquire about great inequities act

  • Should be one day, ten day, eleven day, hundred day, hundred one day, hundred ten day, and hundred eleven day

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • It’s open source….

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Why libreoffice instead of OnlyOffice or NextCloud?

  • Weird website that didn’t name states. Maybe there’s a map that reader mode filtered out

  • Removed Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • I wish it the same success Tesla had in Europe this year.

  • If you don’t add the power I have no context that you’re talking about power rangers

  • I feel old lol

  • Out of pure and utter curiosity, what’s the percentage without China?

  • Dude that website is old af

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • You took a joking jab at red hat and suse a bit too seriously. But let me address at least the red hat portion of it.

    IBM changed took away the Debian equivalent of RedHat: CentOS. They now have CentOS stream which is not what CentOS was -- the free and open RHEL byte for byte compatible operating system. Arguably at the time, yes, I would agree with you -- they were just selling enterprise services. But that's not what it is anymore. They took away the stability of CentOS and had everyone migrate to RHEL or away. There were talks at the time that they were violating the linux license at the time. However, it was argued that they weren't. Because they provide the source code for enterprise license customers, they did not violate the license. HOWEVER, they were cancelling enterprise licenses of people who were taking the source code to make RockyLinux and all the the other distros that came up to replace what CentOS was.

    While yes, you have the freedom to do with the source code as you'd like when you have access to it, IBM is violating the spirit of what that means by throwing access to it behind an enterprise license.