the cool thing about piefed&pylova, is that I read both your unedited undeleted comments.
If a Journal make the mistake giving attention to a scammer, why does a threadie have to attend to the Journal’s mistake.
Did you just came off internet class or something? I am just another crossposter. @inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world was the first to give the scammer a 🔁.
I did tell @redacted@infosec.pub who a is supposed to address, if a really wants to correct the Journal’s mistake. Everyone else that upranked a’s comment can do so as well.
But yes, you can absolutely comment something addressing me, that I did. Otherwise I wouldn't have left the «🔔Notify about replies» enabled.
don't forget the most important dissonance: !skg@lemmy.dbzer0.com doesn't want to be associated with the leaker, and is still wants to engage in capitalist dynamics Take Two Int. has all the leverages on.
This was intentional, because your state doesn't want you syndicalizing. If they associate cooperation with “crime,” you won't ever unionize yourselves. If everyone syndicates, the state wouldn't have the power monopolize who gets to business and who has the privilege to operate. Some intentions of laws are good, but monopoly on who gets to decide who and how things operate is how we get this cronyism.
the cool thing about piefed&pylova, is that I read both your unedited undeleted comments.
If a Journal make the mistake giving attention to a scammer, why does a threadie have to attend to the Journal’s mistake.
Did you just came off internet class or something? I am just another crossposter. @inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world was the first to give the scammer a 🔁.
I did tell @redacted@infosec.pub who a is supposed to address, if a really wants to correct the Journal’s mistake. Everyone else that upranked a’s comment can do so as well.
But yes, you can absolutely comment something addressing me, that I did. Otherwise I wouldn't have left the «🔔Notify about replies» enabled.