But it’s not same serivce.
It's the _exact same service, favors no specific phone over another, has a shared data pool so one user can use 100GB in a month if the other uses none, and the price is locked in by paying yearly.
It’s like you just googled a plan, screen shotted it, didn’t read anything else
I'm on this plan and I've professionally sold phones for over a decade. It's almost like you just googled a plan, and started talking shit about it without even knowing what you're talking about.
You continue to be hands down the dumbest person I've found on lemmy since coming here. You're inventing shit up out of thin air to make it seem like a bad plan when it's LITERALLY (again, literally, not figuratively) the same service you have right now. Both Spectrum and US Mobile are MVNO and RESELL Verizon's service as a third party. It's the same fucking service you have at this exact second for slightly cheaper, much more flexible, and completely fixes the issue that you made this thread about to begin with.
I really hope you find the time to fix yourself in the future because your personality is dog shit.
You need both.
For the third time now--not if the service/device you're using contains both the password and the 2FA... How is this not getting through?
If someone gets into my Bitwarden install, and gets access to both my passwords and my 2FA seeds, in what way does 2FA protect me? I kept all the family jewels in one place. That's the exact situation two factor authentication is designed to prevent by forcing you to have an additional and separate device/key/passcode/password.
I’m not sure what you’re trying to say.
The first thing I said;
I feel a little vindicated.
I apologize. I literally don't know how to make it any more clear than that.
I feel a little vindicated. I started using Firefox basically when it was first released. I migrated away from it after several years because I simply didn't like the direction that Mozilla was taking it. Decades later I see them struggling down the same inevitable path I figured they'd always head down from the beginning.
Firefox bros used to get ultra pissed at me for shitting on their browser because I just knew Mozilla would eventually fuck it all up. And here we are.
The target service can be compromised including your password, but not the 2FA
It entirely depends on the service. Something like Bitwarden where you can include TOTP seeds within the identity they're associated, would be completely compromised if the service is compromised.
Point being, two factor authentication means you need authentication from two sources. If you use the same service or solution for both, you're completely missing the entire point of 2FA because you're only using a single factor.
It doesn't, though. Not even a little bit. Using encrypted services doesn't stop tracking cookies. That too has to be handled client side. So you would use a browser that lets you use host files via extensions (firefox, etc) and other tracking blocking extensions, or you can setup network wide protection via Adguard Home, etc.
The stupidity continues, I see.
You specifically said nothing comes close to Spectrum, and I post something that's $2 cheaper for the exact same service. Both plans are 2 lines, both plans have 100GB of full speed data between 2 lines, and both have unlimited QCI 8/7 data after your 50GB per line (which is the same as your current plan), with unlimited talk and text. It's literally ATT, T-Mobile, or Verizon (you can literally choose which carrier you want, and can even switch them every day).
I posted to literally refute your first statement (which I did--completely) and every correspondence back and forth that we've had since then has been you misunderstanding something one way or another. You need to go back to school. This is honestly so embarrassing for you.
So the whole "we encrypt your life" thing is pretty nice. But in reality look at what you're actually doing... You have super secure encrypted email to do what? Send unencrypted emails to your friends...
It makes no sense to me... Like, you need an encrypted calendar? Why? What are you getting with encryption that you can't get with using a VPN to connect to your local network and access a self-hosted calendar. In what was is that less secure?
Drive? Sure. VPN? Sure. Password manager? Sure. Documents? Sure. I see the value in having H/A for services like this, but all of that can be self-hosted on an rPi in your basement with a rProxy and a domain.
I've been on Lemmy for like 3 weeks, and you're the dumbest person I've met so far. There should be like, an award.
The best part is you don't even understand it.
The wording is so insane to me. Like he was just begging to sign that deal. lol
There's no way he was going to sign it. He didn't come to the US to sign it. He came here to negotiate into a reasonable deal for both countries. This headline makes it sound like he lost out, and he really didn't. Like, sure, we could have swooped in and helped Ukraine a little more, but in return we would get billions, maybe even trillions in return... It's literally war profiteering out in the open.
That kind of shit used to be illegal and now we have Presidents televising his profiteering... This timeline is fucking nuts.
Should you access your 2FA codes on the same device as the password manager?
If you're getting your passwords and 2FA from the same device/service, this isn't 2FA.
YOU'VE REACHED THE LIMIT OF YOUR FREE WEATHER FORECAST UPDATES, PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO WEATHER FORECAST ULTRA! WE SEE THAT YOU'RE A FARMER, GREAT NEWS, THAT MEANS YOU QUALIFY FOR A 20% DISCOUNT ON OUR SERVICE! PLEASE ENTER YOUR CREDIT CARD NUMBER.......
I pay $60 for two
And this is $58 for 2 lines... I literally sent you a picture man... Jesus.
You get reduced speeds at 50 GB, down to basically dial-up speeds. US Mobile's data cap isn't until 100GB, and you still get 1Mbps after the cap...
You get double the data for the same price, for the same 2 phones............... I'm begging you to read man.
Call me paranoid but why do the staff on a lot of private trackers seem so interested in what other trackers you have accounts with?
Because they want to know if you're an abusive user / good seeder or if you're not really worth the time. Running a tracker is hard enough without having to deal with people's shit.
Are you insane? The same plan at Verizon is $65+/mo and it uses traffic shaping to limit your video quality to 480p. lol. It's effectively half the price. Not even to mention that on Verizon you're limited to 60GB/mo;
Unlimited data is restricted to on-device smartphone usage. After exceeding 60 GB/mo of 5G Ultra Wideband, 5G or 4G LTE mobile hotspot data, mobile hotspot data reduced to speeds up to 3 Mbps when on 5G Ultra Wideband and 600 Kbps when on 5G / 4G LTE for the rest of your monthly billing cycle.
Fuck Windows and Microsoft really.
🙏🙏🙏 testify, brother.
I tend to use ZFS because of its advantages when making backups. What would you do?
Then I would stick with ZFS if you're already familiar with it.
Do I use QEMU/KVM virtual machines or LXC/LXD cointainers?
LXD is a management system for LXC containers. If you're just starting out, stick, with LXD. It's much more user friendly.
I shy away from running all services as Docker on the same machine for backup/restore purposes and rather have VMs per service. Is there anything wrong with this approach?
Not really. I run a VPS which acts as a reverse proxy for my docker setup, which has non-local storage via NAS. I don't particularly see a point in fragmenting docker like that, but if that's how you want to roll, then go for it.
I’ve equipped the Deskmeet X300 with a WiFi card and antennas. AFAIU trying to use WLAN instead of LAN will create some trouble. Has anyone running Proxmox on a machine with WLAN insteal of LAN access successfully?
I very strong advise against this. But it's perfectly possible. You're just at the whim of the airwaves. I live near a main highway and sometimes when large trucks go by, I lose WiFi for a quick second. Really fucks with certain things.
Is this just me being paranoid
Yes. Nothing wrong with software firewalls.
would you recommend putting a hardware firewall between the internet access and the Proxmox server?
Also yes. Particularly (like I have setup) I have a software firewall that tunnels my local vLAN to my VPS, and then everything else is further bisected using a hardware firewall--so all outside incoming requests are proxified by my VPS meaning any direct connections are dropped by the software firewall, then I manage ports from within the hardware switch.
Your ISP cannot differentiate between weather the YouTube app is streaming the video or any program is downloading the video.
No to be pedantic, but this isn't true. If you're watching via the YouTube app, the content is served via chunks, and not in one continuous stream. I'm sure it would depend on the ISP, but they could potentially be able to differentiate the two.