Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)T
Posts
1
Comments
462
Joined
3 wk. ago

  • Yet people will still claim Kamala lost because she was a black woman.

  • If you don't value security, that's fine, but one does not need to be Jason Bourne to want a secure device. Also, privacy ≠ security.

  • Bro, your lack of reading comprehension is astounding.

  • One of us, one of us. The newer Wolfenstein games are fun as hell, but holy shit do they make me nauseous. I wish I could play them more, but that camera is awful and messing with the FOV only marginally helps.

  • Too bad those other phones have shit security hardware. That's the only reason Graphene uses Pixels.

  • If what you care about is security though, nothing comes close to Graphene.

  • No OS comes close to Graphene in security. Second hand sales for Graphene are a drop in the bucket for Google. If Graphene went away and people stopped buying second hand Pixels for that purpose, it wouldn't even be a blip to them.

  • POS Nazi *pedophile

  • pikachu_face.jpg

  • I'm not watching 26 seasons of a TV show ffs, I've got better things to do with my time. Skimming the IMBD though, I'm seeing a lot of different causes for the crashes, from bad weather, to machine failure, to running out of fuel, improper maintenance, pilot errors, etc. Remember, my point had nothing to do with mechanical failure. Any machine can fail. My point was that airplanes don't routinely spit out false information in the day-to-day function of the machine like AI does. You're getting into strawman territory mate.

  • So you found five examples in the history of human aviation, how often do you think AI hallucinates information? Because I can guarantee you its a hell of a lot more frequently than that.

  • I'm talking about the article that AbidanYre linked a few comments up, not the article from the post.

  • Fucking slop

  • What did you do instead?

  • It doesn't even need to be all the tech companies, only a handful of very large companies have a stranglehold on this technology, and corporations conspire on shit like this all the fucking time. Its not even remotely a stretch to think that.

  • Lots of people are suggesting that, and the shoe fits.

  • Smaller subs definitely had plenty of empathetic people, but if you're going in the bigger subs, its a cesspool of scum and villainy.

  • If I'm canoeing upriver, the river is working against me. That doesn't mean it has a will. LLMs don't need to have a will to work against you if your goal is to get accurate information, because by its very design it is just as likely to provide innnacurate information based on the way the tokens it applies to your query are weighted. You cannot control that. Its not plain wrong. Jfc, you slop apologists are fucking delusional. AI doesn't magically work better for you because you're special and can somehow counteract its basic fucking design.

  • Except with a plane, if you know how to fly it you're far less likely to crash it. Even if you "can use LLMs" there's still a pretty strong chance you're going to get shit back due to its very nature. One the machine works with you, the other the machine is always working against you.

  • Selfhosted @lemmy.world

    Anyone have any experience with TubeArchivist?