Skip Navigation

User banner
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)M
Posts
0
Comments
132
Joined
1 mo. ago

  • Fun fact: that's not how humidity works. It, in fact, DOES help to get water to evaporate by forcing the local humidity around the phone to stay low. Otherwise you may as well say all the people doing 3D printing that use desiccant to keep water out of their filaments are fools, too.

    What it won't do is magically erase any gunk or minerals that were in the water that can short out traces on unprotected PCBs and chips even with the water gone.

    So, yes, it is not magic that can fix any phone that saw water. Though it absolutely helps to get the water out of the phone. ... I mean, unless you live in a desert where the humidity should already be sufficiently low most days.

  • Their purity test: You must not deny genocide.

    What you heard their purity test was: They must accept that any and all genocides that I think exist are real and a big problem.

    Again, you fucking morons are inferring things that aren't there just to try and be witty, while utterly missing the point...

    Congratulations on failing your reading comprehension test.

  • English must be so hard for you when you utterly fail to understand how assumptions work. Good job being a piece of shit contributing to the problem you're attempting to be above.

  • Nowhere did I say it was too rigid for this test. It's too rigid for many other tests, but not this one.

    That's the point. The ENTIRE POINT is this is the ONE test where overly rigid (but not insanely rigid) vehicles fare well.

  • So... the sign of Jonah is ... using big words?

    If someone thinks that's a sign of evil, they're only showing that they WANT to be ignorant fuckwits.

    On the other hand, as Einstein said, "If you cannot explain it simply, you do not understand it well enough".

    IMO, the riduclous old-timey and mistranslated verbiage of that style of verses are exactly the "fancy words for words sake" that only contributes to people failing to understand things. Religious texts are largely just a failure at attempting to mix history, ethics, and baby's first philosophy. Anyone who clings to such misguided, poorly worded, and often straight up outdated ways of thinking is only harming themselves, just as those poorly worded verses warn against.

  • So... you're too stupid to understand how knowledge works? You're too dense to understand the concept of the "known unknown" vs the "unknown unknown"?

    You ignorant morons are insufferable to me.

  • If we were talking about real neural networks that have real complexity to them and not LLMs, I might agree. Though we aren't. We are still years away from any form of AI being capable of gen AI.

  • Best economic system ever, they say. Unlike communism, this is a situation where you can say it has been tried many times throughout history.

  • what?

  • While House was a bit of an ass, such behavior I'm sure comes up more often than doctors would like. Sure, people that self-select by going in to the hospital are far more likely to accept treatment than the nuttos that think essential oils can cure Measles, but people resist good advice for all sorts of stupid reasons. Also some good ones, like, "I literally cannot afford it".

  • OP is part of the problem. Feeding social media until it could become an unstoppable force.

  • I dunno', unless I hear shouting and those typical inflections of, "I'm REALLY pissed off", I'll only ever think an argument in French is going to lead to rough makeup sex.

  • Holy shit, I would unironically start trolling her... Give her chickens Jewish names so when she starts badmouthing them, she might have a clue she's just being a bigot, exactly like Nazis in that respect of, "everyone of a group I don't like is guilty".

    I'd start giving her nicknames of officers that stood over concentration camps if she continued.

  • Their example of bigots was racists and nazis plus pedos (which isn't bigotry but universally frowned upon). They did NOT say, "any and all bigots, even of minor things".

    Why are you trying to make them say something they did not say?

    You are part of the problem. When someone says, "I like pancakes", what they SPECIFICALLY DID NOT SAY is, "I hate waffles".

    Similarly, when someone says, "you cannot compromize with nazis and bigots", what they DID NOT say was, "any concervative deserves the death penalty". Why do you read it as such?

  • You're all making generalities out of assumptions here...

  • The latter one is more of a human trait. That's why basically every conservative will immediately suspect you pf something if you start badmouthing religions (at least their religion), even with totally accurate critique they happen to not know much about.

  • Too bad for them, but reality has a left bias when the right denies the basics of reality... All such "bias removing" training will do is make a worse product.

  • Most nationalism is.

  • OFC the too-rigid deathtrap scores well on the test that benefits from rigidity...