Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)L

LoveRainbow

@ LoveRainbow @lemmy.world

Posts
1
Comments
59
Joined
3 mo. ago

Philosophy (MA) Psychology (BA)

Pro-AI Vegetarian Misanthrope Cynic Agnostic/Atheist

It is precisely because the users of social media are so so awful that we use it.

  • I am extremely fatigued with the constant negativity

    Jump

  • For me: it's the total loss of faith in humanity.

    Even the political views I used to associate with "the good people" - now I see their proponents as maniputive, self-serving, bullies.

    So there's no cause to support anymore: no good or evil. No point supporting the needy: because they're terrible people just like everyone else - I'll only be supporting their selfishness and the suffering they will create.

    So all I'm left with is: getting from this moment of time until the time of my death as easily as possible.

  • Some Republican governors are rebranding Pride Month with conservative alternatives

    Jump

  • 🏳️‍🌈🎉❤️Shame Month❤️🎉🏳️‍🌈

  • Anger Over Oxford Union’s Tommy Robinson Invite Amid Suggestions of GB News Deal

    Jump

  • Deplarforming and silencing people whose views you dislike seems like a petty form of bullying to me.

    People should be allowed to express views and have them challenged.

    I believe that when people feel like a particular political movement is trying to silence them and control the narrative in this way: it only strengthens their opponents.

    Many of us are here on Summit because we basically got "deplatformed" for political views around Israel: I ask you if that deplatforming has reduced or strengthened your convictions?

  • Trans people like me are facing segregation now. We need parliament to restore our rights

    Jump

  • Nobody wants trans people to die. Your post sounds like the ramblings of a paranoid schizophrenic.

    I would bet substantial money that your predictions are false.

  • Gabe Newell on Steam monopoly accusations: Gamers have 'enormous choice' about where to buy games

    Jump

  • The lawyer should just be able to give this meme to the judge and have the case closed.

  • What question can I ask ChatGPT, right now, that will reliably produce a factually incorrect, wrong, or false answer?

    Jump

  • So, we might find these bizarre scenarios that confuse the system (based on our own deceptions): but basically it's answering questions pretty reliably right?

    Fundamentally anti-AI people are overstating the problem.

  • What question can I ask ChatGPT, right now, that will reliably produce a factually incorrect, wrong, or false answer?

    Jump

  • What's your point?

    You think that's an appropriate analogy for ChatGPT?

    "Guessing and usually getting it wrong a few times before it gives you the right answer"?

    If that's true why can't anyone here give me a question that it gives a false answer to.

    As in: it is currently getting every question right, first time.

    As I said: the only misleading answer to any question I have asked it in the last year (as someone who uses it all the time, both for work and personally) was about a heavily politicised history matter.

    Even then, the information was accurate - just incredibly one sided and biased.

    So go on, give me a question that it will get wrong...

  • What question can I ask ChatGPT, right now, that will reliably produce a factually incorrect, wrong, or false answer?

    Jump

  • Ok...so give me a question that will produce a false answer...

    Nobody else has yet.

  • What question can I ask ChatGPT, right now, that will reliably produce a factually incorrect, wrong, or false answer?

    Jump

  • Right...

    So, if I ask it a thousand random questions, a thousand times, and 99.9% of the time it gives the right answer: is that sufficient scientific evidence that it's shit hot?

    How exactly would your experiment work? How much data are you going to need to, personally, accept that it's actually - already - pretty reliable and only very rarely gives misleading answers in very niche areas, or when people deliberately try to confuse it?

    The thing is: this social media platform (like Reddit) has a massively anti-AI bias, and yet not a single person has been able to give me a single question that I can enter into the latest GPT model where GPT has produced inaccurate results.

    Perhaps this criticism was more relevant a few years ago. As it stands it's an argument that doesn't seem to be readily supportable.

    Can you prove to me, using "the scientific method" that the latest model of ChatGPT has a significant chance of producing misleading information?

    And for the critics...I'm not entirely sure what they think is currently a better source of answers to questions? Random Google results where the page has paid to be at the top? Social media? Or combing through Google Scholar and finding...whichever "scientific paper" supports...whatever one wants to believe...(We saw how well that went in the pandemic).

  • What question can I ask ChatGPT, right now, that will reliably produce a factually incorrect, wrong, or false answer?

    Jump

  • Ok...so prove how shit it is by giving me a single question that I can ask it right now where it will give me the wrong information.

    Your point is entirely reductionist: it's a "glorified search engine" that processes all of the search results with a breadth and speed most people either cannot or will not (due to time constraints) do, in seconds, and then gives an answer that is superior to any of the individual sources it bases that answer on.

    It also expresses that answer in highly adaptable ways: e.g. it can express the final answer in a way suitable for a child or a postgraduate expert, or a person who learns best through answers written in a style that combines Norse Sagas and Shakespeare.

  • Israeli Settler Council Issues Unprecedented Admission of Ritualistic Child Sexual Abuse After Broadcaster Exposes Cover-Up

    Jump

  • Circumcision is ritualistic child sexual abuse.

  • What question can I ask ChatGPT, right now, that will reliably produce a factually incorrect, wrong, or false answer?

    Jump

  • Ok, but that's obviously a pretty shitty AI - when we use the latest GPT model in the thinking mode, it basically doesn't seem to make any mistakes.

    So, that one criticism of AI seems to be less and less relevant. A problem that is soon becoming, virtually, non-existent.

  • What question can I ask ChatGPT, right now, that will reliably produce a factually incorrect, wrong, or false answer?

    Jump

  • It's not a baseless assumption.

    It is an assumption based on the fact that every model upgrade has, so far, made answers more accurate.

  • What question can I ask ChatGPT, right now, that will reliably produce a factually incorrect, wrong, or false answer?

    Jump

  • I mean...the anti-AI brigade keep insisting that AI has a tendency to give false answers: but nobody in this thread has actually been able to give me a single question which, when the latest ChatGPT model is asked, it gives a wrong answer to.

    Kinda makes it seem like that one particular point is largely nonsense.

  • What question can I ask ChatGPT, right now, that will reliably produce a factually incorrect, wrong, or false answer?

    Jump

  • More.

  • What question can I ask ChatGPT, right now, that will reliably produce a factually incorrect, wrong, or false answer?

    Jump

  • By definition that would be a rather difficult thing to falsify. I tend to find the answers in my own academic fields (philosophy and psychology) to be accurate and impressive.

    Admittedly that rarely requires asking for direct passages from texts: usually more the refinement of basic principles, application of such principles, or creating new theories by combining previous ones.

    When I ask for philosophical quotations, it hasn't produced an error I've observed yet: presumably it often combs the many quotation websites for such things.

    Can you give me an example of a question I can ask it where it will misquote and/or rewrite something?

    I am not an expert in Magic The Gathering but perhaps I can somehow see what you mean.

  • If men gave birth, abortion clinics would be on every corner

    Jump

  • The post did not state that men no longer had penises and were incapable of inseminating others.

  • What question can I ask ChatGPT, right now, that will reliably produce a factually incorrect, wrong, or false answer?

    Jump

  • In any case: the latest model gets the answer right 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • What question can I ask ChatGPT, right now, that will reliably produce a factually incorrect, wrong, or false answer?

    Jump

  • But...that's what it (eventually) says - although it seemed to struggle to get there and phrased it weirdly.

  • Asklemmy @lemmy.ml
    LoveRainbow @lemmy.world

    What question can I ask ChatGPT, right now, that will reliably produce a factually incorrect, wrong, or false answer?