You dismiss the whole person just because they acknowledge using an LLM? That seems a bit harsh - especially since they had the decency to mention the source, which is basically the same as saying "take this with a grain of salt."
- Posts
- 3
- Comments
- 172
- Joined
- 3 wk. ago
- Posts
- 3
- Comments
- 172
- Joined
- 3 wk. ago
Mildly Interesting @lemmy.world This bridge in Finland has hooks to hang explosives from in case it needs to be collapsed to stop Russian advance
Showerthoughts @lemmy.world One good thing about getting into a new relationship is that you get to re-tell all your best jokes and stories
Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world What is a relatively inexpensive item that offers entertainment beyond it's intented usecase?
Who said it needs to add value? The article claims that showing AI-generated content to others without them explicitly asking for it is inherently bad - even when you tell them it's AI. So basically: if you share it without mentioning the source you're deceiving people, and if you do mention it it's still bad... because reasons.
To me that just sounds like an ideological stance more than a logical one.