Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)H
Posts
0
Comments
577
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • we live in a clown world

  • check out the llm benchmarks as well down below

  • oh, I thought that was so obvious everybody knew that already

  • tldw?

  • oh shit thats really weird systemd design...

  • It's my personal top candidates in the order of my preference (best to worst) from my notes when I was researching this topic for my parents. (funnily enough, they ultimately settled on kdenlive, despite not being very computer proficient, because they found more step by step yt guides for what they wanted to do with it)

    All still actively maintained.

    I played around with each of those for a bit some time ago and they were quite similar, so you can pick by your personal preference.

  • "people"

  • Some routers do support it.

    • OpenWrt: enable SQM (cake + piece_of_cake.qos)
    • Ubiquiti: enable Smart Queue
    • FritzBox: limited but has prioritization
    • OPNsense/pfSense: fq_codel / CAKE

    would be even betyer cause it shapes the entire network, not just your PC

    but apparently you can also install cake on any linux and use it to do what you want:

    https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/tc-cake.8.html

    https://github.com/tohojo/sqm-scripts

    good readup about cake but not focused on your usecase: https://grapheneos.org/articles/server-traffic-shaping

    I have no clue about bazzite, so you are on your own there.

  • Interesting discussion, the opinions go both ways but the official ones seem to disregard some facts and base the decision on some arbitrary ones that were not listed in OPs linked article, which I find quite biased or at least untransparent.

  • You could have guessed from the context that it is another privacy focused messenger app

  • And no mention of threema even though it fulfills all their listed criteria

  • to me that smells like what I said in the other comment:

    Wayland might be a bit stricter when it comes to following specs and not implementing hacky workarounds. (or it could always be a bug)

    I feel like, if a cable is high quality and up to spec, it will work with wayland. But if the signal integrity is below spec, wayland might fall back to slower signaling while x11 is more lax and ignores the issue and so a worse cable still works even if unnoticably below spec quality. Or the 4k over hdmi 1.3 is some hack that x11 supports and wayland doesn't because it's out of spec.

    But thats just a feeling. May be wrong.

    Thanks for reporting back with your findings!

  • I’d rather be chill and blame some third party.

    Can't plausibly blame em if they solve the efficiency issue

  • Now imagine solving that and becoming 25% more efficient, but still getting the same wage. (historically, the leadership rakes in all the profits without sharing when efficiency increases)

    I'd rather be chill and blame some third party. Hail Atlassian.

  • I'm not actually working in the field, so I can't give you any advice there.

    I studied a related topic, before pivoting into a different career. And I do hardware and drivers stuff in my free time sometimes for some fun projects.