FanciestPants @ FanciestPants @lemmy.world Posts 1Comments 214Joined 2 yr. ago
Be engineer, draw pictures with numbers next to it that mean that your picture is important. Give picture to someone who agrees that your picture is important and presses on your picture with a stamp. Then give your picture to people that don't work at desks to make a thing that looks like your important picture.
I get the sentiment, but worry that this is punishing people that don't have anything to do with the atrocities being committed by the US regime. Some of those 500 US citizens may be seeking asylum, like some of the rest of us are considering.
I figured it was so that when it's discovered that they've been boning other dudes (or kids unfortunately) they can blame TSA scanners or some other shit. Surely it can't just be that they're monstrous assholes.
Oh no, I didn't mean for my pickpocketing scams with hostile service and aggressive touts to mean that I didn't want to be friends 😢. For sure the US though.
Permanently Deleted
One month before midterms?
I don't know why these are asked in the past tense like I don't still do these things.
Why make an allowance for property managers? Seems like they see a group of people being exploited, and want to find a way to take a cut of that exploitation.
The federal government, as the post suggests? The federal government in the US is doing plenty of law breaking right now, but not in the interest of the unhoused. If this was in their interest though (which given the private holdings of executive, i would doubt), then yes, they could probably accomplish this in one month.
I think because of ex post facto, it would take 2 years at least for the housing problem to be solved in this scenario, and I don't know if handing private assets over to any particular federal government (ahem, US government) would result in the benefit to unhoused people that this comment suggests.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MohJLPgutKQ&pp=ygUgc2FkZGFtIGh1c3NlaW4gYmFhdGggcGFydHkgcHVyZ2U%3D
I hope they can see some historic parallels. Shit can get really real in one afternoon.
I think that when typical toddlers throw tantrums, they usually believe that there is some injustice that they are outraged about, like why they can't have candy at 10:00 at night. Miller's tantrums seem entirely performative and I don't believe that he truly gives a fuck about any of the victims in his many anecdotes that he will cite, only that he gets to pretend he has moral superiority over someone who doesn't show the same pretend outrage.
Trump: No, and now it's illegal for you not to like me.
I feel like the LivePrudeGirls channel deserves a shout out here too. Milana and Stevie Nelson had a few fantastic interviews.
That was my first thought too. No grand conspiracy or personal mission here, just basic corruption by some of the shittiest people.
This seems like a dubious tactic in any state that has "stand your ground" laws.