Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)EX
Posts
4
Comments
689
Joined
2 yr. ago
  • Because he needs to pretend support for him is absolute while in reality only vast majority supports him. Because he cannot allow any opposition to grow in Russia in case he makes a mistake, like he did with Ukraine. Because if there's any sign of weakness even his allies will turn against him in a heartbeat.

    He's tampering with elections to move it from 70-80% to 100%, not to move it from 10% to 100%. It's lower since the war didn't go as planned but most Russians supported Putin and his war.

  • I get what you’re doing, trying to play around the wording.

    No, I'm agreeing with you while taking the opportunity to remind everyone what absolute scum Russians are.

    no one is apologizing for what the Russian military is doing.

    Exactly. Someone should apologize.

    And I also see what you're doing, putting all the blame on the military like Putin was not generally loved in Russia before the war. Russian are pissed only because now they also have to die. If Putin only murdered Ukrainians they would still happily support him and his war.

  • Fun fact: in most countries in the world breaking and entering is not a life or death situation for the cops. Cop shows in Europe are really boring. Cops show up, ask questions, figure out what happen and arrest someone (or not). How insane is that?

  • Yet the example of the sim you posted (the exact type I had in mind) is from police training. This is exactly what I was talking about: police using military style training and using it in way that desensitizes officers.

    I'm not saying the training is exactly the same as in military, I'm not saying it's as common. I'm saying that cops are trigger happy (as in the original article) because of this type of training. In many countries police are trained to shoot only as a last resort (or don't even carry guns). IDK, maybe it's different in US but most people have natural blockades preventing them from shooting others. That it's so easy for US cops to shoot at people for me means that they are trained to do it. All the effort that goes into this type of training should go into de-escalation training instead.

  • So in military you don't train by shooting at human shaped targets? You're not trained to shoot quickly at pop-up targets? You don't have hand-to-hand combat training? What do you think it's all for? Self control? BS.

    Police does the same. They often run simulation after simulation in which they have to fire quickly at simulated people. It all serves the same purpose: remove the natural mental blockades people have that stop them from killing other people. Is desensitize them.

    No need to get triggered. I'm not saying cops are trained as well as soldiers. Just that they often use the same techniques.

  • Lemmy Shitpost @lemmy.world
    ExLisper @linux.community

    Cheese

    Cheese

    Programmer Humor @lemmy.ml
    ExLisper @linux.community

    Package managers be like

    Sorry Python but it is what it is.

    Asklemmy @lemmy.ml
    ExLisper @linux.community

    What's the closest you have ever been to actually dying?

    How close was it?

    Privacy @lemmy.ml
    ExLisper @linux.community

    Haven't seen any posts about this and it's a pretty big thing. From DMA website:

    Examples of the “do’s”: gatekeepers will for example have to:

    • allow third parties to inter-operate with the gatekeeper’s own services in certain specific situations;
    • provide companies advertising on their platform with the tools and information necessary for advertisers and publishers to carry out their own independent verification of their advertisements hosted by the gatekeeper;
    • allow their business users to promote their offer and conclude contracts with their customers outside the gatekeeper’s platform.

    Example of the “don'ts”: gatekeepers will for example no longer:

    • treat services and products offered by the gatekeeper itself more favourably in ranking than similar services or products offered by third parties on the gatekeeper's platform;
    • prevent users from un-installing any pre-installed software or app if they wish so;
    • track end users outside of the gatekeepers' core platform servi