It absolutely delay people buying. If you held out for 6 more months, you'd get a substantially faster computer.

That describes most of my life, under Moore's Law.

I handled it in the traditional way: I bought what I wanted, and then I immediately cussed about my shitty timing to my friends the next day.

It’s not like cars would eventually cost negative money and they pay you to take them.

While I accept your point, I feel conditioned to interrupt here and clarify that I absolutely would download a car. There was some unexpected confusion about this, at one point.

Okay. Carry on. Thank you.

"Enterprises might discover that production agent deployments are harder than demos suggest. Hallucinations in high-stakes workflows, regulatory concerns around autonomous AI systems, or implementation complexity could slow adoption dramatically. If the agent future takes 5-7 years instead of 2-3, there's a painful gap where billions in infrastructure sits waiting for demand to catch up."

Yes. AI agents in infrastructure are a fundamentally stupid idea, at their very core.

Learn to write a bash script or pay someone competent to do it.

Almost no one needs a shittier solution that is 1000x faster to implement while 100x more likely to make profit-margin-evaporating mistakes.

Even the idiots calling the shots today are bound to notice this.

There's a third category of adoption to consider: "between 7 years and - let's not fucking do this, it is stupid"

There's a delightful DC Comics Elseworlds story that amounts to this. It was fun.

Sure you harpsichord! Anyone harpsichord do it!

I don't think this is the right community for it...

That's right,

A third person is about to show up and express mild interest, then they will wander off for a drink, but then return and ask to have the rules explanation start over....

I've always liked the idea of the cap being an immediate loss of any legal property protection.

This would not be through any process, they simply instantly legally cease to have any property rights anytime they cannot prove their net worth is below the limit.

Any member of the public can reclaim any piexe of their ex-property, until the not-quite-billiomaire gets a court ruling confirming their not-a-billionaire status.

Then the not-yet-billionaires can figure out how to constantly stay comfortably below the limit.

Or...they can file an updated wealth disclosure every time they attempt to keep anyone from walking away with any piece of their former property.

If they want to avoid the inconvenience of their yachts, cars, pets, plants, fences, lamps, and television sets being repossessed, they can negotiate with their employees unions for collective ownership in good faith, instead.

It'll be fun to see how many of them are too stupid to take a good deal, and lose their stupid toys.

I dont have time to build and maintain a curated offline library like I used to.

I'm sorry for your loss. I'm sure the high seas legitimate DRM free music purchases will welcome you back when you have time again.

Good points. I feel like Fate does a better job staying in the interesting in-between for longer, and also supports "epic" stories a bit better (than other systems I have played).

But I haven't tried to force Fate to support the newbie to epic growth, because the rulebook calls out that the Fate rules intentionally ignore supporting the ability to play as a helpless nobody.

Hence the number one rule: cool stuff should be done in the game, not your backstory.

I prefer Fate, where the rules practically require having cool stuff in each character's back story.

Yes. That's one reason that the Fate system basically disallows characters ever being low level. Low level starts aren't actually particularly fun, and they can prevent characters from having diverse epic shared backstory.

Raspberry Pi with Android Open Source Project is the best privacy option. It's quite a bit of work to get tuned, but nice afterward.

I'll wait.

crickets hum to each-other in the distance

I don't really think you can possibly do something to deserve eternal torment like some of these comments seem so gleeful about.

It wouldn't be eternal. Most kids don't have that kind of attention span.

Plus, these consciousnesses might be carefully protected the way major corporations have protected my SSN. So maybe the billionaires have nothing to worry about...

I mean, I would.

Of course, the pool won't have a ladder...

I tolerate continued existence out of a morbid sense of curiosity.

That's beautiful, in it's own way.

I felt that way at one point. It led me, eventually, to moments that I later decided mattered very much, to me.

If I hadn't had that morbid curiosity, I'm not sure I would have made it to those moments I now cherish.

Here's to morbid curiosity!

"A wizards staff has a knob at the end."

GNU Sir Terry Pratchett

Do you happen to also use Arch?

No. If I did, I would say so!

Haha.

(Apologies to my arch-user peers.)

Eh, you can post, but people might just ignore it. So you're screaming into the void for the most part.

I love this analogy, and I need to expand on it.

Lemmy is like taking a pleasant walk, with mostly chill fellow hikers, through a nature preserve, and then taking turns shouting into an empty canyon.

Sometimes a nice and/or informative discussion follows during the hike back to the lodge for some hot cocoa.